Editorial Comment
Editorial Comment to Day-case catheterless and drainless minimal-access pyeloplasty in adults: A single-center experience of 13 years
Teruo Inamoto M.D., Ph.D.,
Corresponding Author
Teruo Inamoto M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
Search for more papers by this author Haruhito Azuma M.D., Ph.D.,
Haruhito Azuma M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
Search for more papers by this author
Teruo Inamoto M.D., Ph.D.,
Corresponding Author
Teruo Inamoto M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
Search for more papers by this author Haruhito Azuma M.D., Ph.D.,
Haruhito Azuma M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 March 2021
No abstract is available for this article.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
References
- 1Ganpule A, Bhattu A, Mishra S, Desai MR. Ultrasound-guided antegrade access during laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants less than one year of age: a point of technique. J. Minim. Access Surg. 2012; 8: 107–10.
- 2Khawaja AR, Dar TI, Bashir F, Sharma A, Tyagi V, Bazaz MS. Stentless laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a single center experience. Urol. Ann. 2014; 6: 202–7.
- 3Silva MV, Levy AC, Finkelstein JB, Van Batavia JP, Casale P. Is peri-operative urethral catheter drainage enough? The case for stentless pediatric robotic pyeloplasty. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2015; 11: 175.e1–175.e5.
- 4Murali V, Donati-Bourne J, Thomas M, Luscombe C, Golash A, Fernando H. Day-case catheterless and drainless minimal-access pyeloplasty in adults: a single-center experience of 13 years. Int. J. Urol. 2021; 28: 514–8.
