Volume 23, Issue 2 e12514
RESEARCH PAPER

The ethics of postoperative pain management: Mapping nurses' views

Maria Dolores Cano Romero MA

Maria Dolores Cano Romero MA

Jean-Jaurès University, Toulouse, France

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Teresa Muñoz Sastre PhD

Maria Teresa Muñoz Sastre PhD

Jean-Jaurès University, Toulouse, France

Search for more papers by this author
Bruno Quintard PhD

Bruno Quintard PhD

Victor-Segalen University, Bordeaux, France

Search for more papers by this author
Paul C. Sorum PhD

Paul C. Sorum PhD

Albany Medical College, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Etienne Mullet PhD

Corresponding Author

Etienne Mullet PhD

Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE), Paris, France

Correspondence

Etienne Mullet, Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE), 17 bis rue de Quefes, F-31830 Plaisance, Paris, France.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 February 2017
Citations: 7

Abstract

Aim: We explored the positions of nurses working in hospitals regarding the acceptability of refusing to give a repeat dose of painkiller to a postoperative patient who requested it. These positions were compared with that of lay people, physicians, and other health professionals. Design and Methods: Factorial design was used to assess the impact of 6 situational factors: the patient's age, the current level of pain as assessed by the nurse, the number of requests, the level of risk associated with the administration of a repeat dose, the outcome of surgery, and the giving of alternative mild analgesics. We implemented a combination of scenario technique and of cluster analysis. Data were collected from April 2013 to December 2015. Participants: 138 registered nurses, 32 nurse's aides, 33 physicians, 23 psychologists, and 169 lay people participated in the study. Results: We found 4 qualitatively different meaningful positions. A plurality of participants (57% of nurses) considered that refusing was not acceptable, irrespective of circumstances. A substantial minority of participants (but 52% of physicians) considered that refusing was acceptable only if the level of pain was low and the risk was high. Other participants (mostly lay people) considered that refusing was always acceptable each time a risk of side effects, either serious or simply mild, was present.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.