Volume 44, Issue 5 pp. 945-951
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Thromboelastography in guiding preventive platelet transfusion in patients with haematologic diseases

Yan-Hui Wei

Yan-Hui Wei

Department of Haematology, Puyang Oilfield General Hospital Affiliated with Xinxiang Medical University, Puyang, China

School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Zhao-Xu Miao

Zhao-Xu Miao

Department of Haematology, Puyang Oilfield General Hospital Affiliated with Xinxiang Medical University, Puyang, China

Search for more papers by this author
Xue-Jun Guo

Corresponding Author

Xue-Jun Guo

Department of Haematology, Puyang Oilfield General Hospital Affiliated with Xinxiang Medical University, Puyang, China

Correspondence

Xue-Jun Guo, Department of Haematology, Puyang Oilfield General Hospital Affiliated with Xinxiang Medical University, Puyang, Henan Province 457000, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 June 2022

Abstract

Objective

This study analysed the relationships between the main thromboelastography (TEG) parameters, the platelet (PLT) count and clinical bleeding in patients with blood diseases. We explored the threshold of the relevant parameters in the pathological condition of bleeding, aiming to scientifically guide clinical prophylactic PLT transfusion.

Methods

In total, 268 patients with clear diagnoses of blood diseases and thrombocytopenia were enrolled and divided into five groups, A, B, C, D and E, corresponding to PLT counts of 0–10 × 109/L, 11–20 × 109/L, 21–30 × 109/L, 31–50 × 109/L and 51–100 × 109/L, respectively. TEG and routine blood testing were performed simultaneously, the main TEG parameters and the PLT count were analysed, and the thresholds of the main TEG parameters in each group when the patient had bleeding were obtained.

Results

The maximum amplitude (MA) in groups A, B and C increased gradually, with a significant difference between each pair of these groups (P < 0.05). In groups A, B, C, D and E, the corresponding MA at the time of bleeding was 43.5 mm, 39.6 mm, 38.0 mm, 35.2 mm and 50.5 mm, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The MA can be used as a reference indicator for preventive PLT transfusion to a certain extent. When the PLT count is within different ranges, the MA threshold for preventive PLT transfusion also differs. It is recommended that different PLT counts be correlated with different MA thresholds to guide clinical prophylactic PLT transfusion.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article because no data sets were generated or analysed during the current study.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.