Volume 43, Issue 6 pp. 1501-1509
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The utility of a myeloid mutation panel for the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm

Warda Ibrar

Warda Ibrar

Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Weiwei Zhang

Weiwei Zhang

Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jesse Lee Cox

Jesse Lee Cox

Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Allison Cushman-Vokoun

Allison Cushman-Vokoun

Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kai Fu

Kai Fu

Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Timothy C. Greiner

Timothy C. Greiner

Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ji Yuan

Corresponding Author

Ji Yuan

Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA

Correspondence

Ji Yuan, Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 July 2021
Citations: 4

Warda Ibrar and Weiwei Zhang are co-first authors.

Abstract

Introduction

The diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) is based on morphology and cytogenetics/FISH findings per 2017 WHO classification. With rare exceptions, somatic mutations have not been incorporated as the diagnostic criteria.

Methods

We analyzed the utility of mutational analysis with a targeted 54-gene or 40-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel in the diagnosis of MDS and MDS/MPN.

Results

We retrospectively collected 92 patients who presented with unexplained cytopenia with or without cytosis, including 32 low-grade MDS (MDS-L), 18 high-grade MDS (MDS-H), 5 therapy-related MDS (MDS-TR), 19 MDS/MPN, and 18 negative cases. Of 92 patients, 197 somatic mutations involving 38 genes were detected and had variant allele frequency (VAF) ranging from 3% to 99%. The most common mutated genes were TET2, ASXL1, RUNX1, TP53, SRSF2, and SF3B1. MDS-L, MDS-H, MDS-TR, and MDS/MPN showed an average number of somatic mutations with a mean VAF of 1.9/33%, 2.6/30%, 2/36%, and 4/41%, respectively. SF3B1 mutations were exclusively observed in MDS-L and MDS/MPN. TP53 gene mutations were more frequently seen in MDS-H and MDS-TR. Among 34 patients with a diagnosis of MDS or MDS/MPN with normal cytogenetics, 31 patients (91%) had at least 1 mutation and 24 patients (71%) had ≥2 mutations with ≥10% VAF.

Conclusion

A myeloid mutational panel provides additional evidence of clonality besides cytogenetics/FISH studies in the diagnosis of cytopenia with or without cytosis. Two or more mutations with ≥10% VAF highly predicts MDS and MDS/MPN with a positive predictive value of 100%.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no competing interests.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.