Volume 43, Issue 6 pp. 1357-1362
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Alinity hq platelet results are equivalent with the international reference method in thrombocytopenic samples

Mark A. Lifson

Mark A. Lifson

Hematology, Abbott, Santa Clara, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Masatoshi Wakui

Masatoshi Wakui

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Tomoko Arai

Tomoko Arai

Clinical Laboratory, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Takayuki Mitsuhashi

Takayuki Mitsuhashi

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Gabriella Lakos

Corresponding Author

Gabriella Lakos

Hematology, Abbott, Santa Clara, CA, USA

Correspondence

Gabriella Lakos, Abbott, 4551 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Mitsuru Murata

Mitsuru Murata

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 July 2021
Citations: 2

Abstract

Introduction

Accurate and precise platelet (PLT) count is critical for the appropriate management of patients with thrombocytopenia. This study evaluated the performance of PLT counting with the Abbott Alinity hq hematology analyzer, which utilizes multi-dimensional optical technology.

Methods

Imprecision, linearity, and accuracy were assessed per CLSI guidelines. Alinity hq PLT results were compared to the international flow cytometry reference method (IRM) in the concentration range of 6.3 to 103.0 × 109/L. Additional comparisons were made with Sysmex XN-3000 PLT counts: impedance (PLT-I), optical (PLT-O), and optical fluorescent (PLT-F) methods.

Results

The average within-run %CV was 4.7% on patient samples with PLT concentrations ranging from 13.1 to 41.7 × 109/L, and the within-laboratory %CV was 3.6% at the level of 68.2 × 109/L. Linearity evaluation indicated a maximum deviation of 3.1% from the linear fit in the range of 0.1 to 316.8 × 109/L. Comparison between Alinity hq and the IRM PLT counts yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.99 and predicted bias of 0.0 and −0.5 × 109/L at 10.0 and 20.0 × 109/L transfusion thresholds, respectively. Alinity hq PLT counts also correlated well with Sysmex PLT counts, with strongest correlation obtained with PLT-F and PLT-O (r = .99) methods.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated excellent analytical performance of Alinity hq PLT counting in thrombocytopenic samples, equivalency with the IRM and strong agreement with Sysmex PLT-F and PLT-O methods. The Alinity hq multi-dimensional optical PLT count is available with every CBC without additional reagents and may help promote efficiency in clinical laboratories.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

M. A. Lifson: Employee of Abbott; G. Lakos: Employee of Abbott; T. Arai: No conflict of interest; T. Mitsuhashi: No conflict of interest; M. Wakui: No conflict of interest; M. Murata: No conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.