Volume 43, Issue 6 pp. 1284-1290
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Heparin dosage, level, and resistance in SARS-CoV2 infected patients in intensive care unit

Chiara Novelli

Corresponding Author

Chiara Novelli

Transfusion Center and Haematology Laboratory, Legnano Hospital, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano, Italy

Correspondence

Chiara Novelli, Transfusion Center and Haematology Laboratory, Legnano Hospital, ASST Ovest Milanese, Via Papa Giovanni Paolo II, Legnano (Milano) 20025, Italy.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Erika Borotto

Erika Borotto

Intensive Care Unit, Legnano Hospital, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Ivo Beverina

Ivo Beverina

Transfusion Center and Haematology Laboratory, Legnano Hospital, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Veronica Punzi

Veronica Punzi

Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Danilo Radrizzani

Danilo Radrizzani

Intensive Care Unit, Legnano Hospital, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Bruno Brando

Bruno Brando

Transfusion Center and Haematology Laboratory, Legnano Hospital, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 April 2021
Citations: 18

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with COVID-19 frequently exhibit a hypercoagulable state with high thrombotic risk, particularly those admitted to intensive care units (ICU). Thromboprophylaxis is mandatory in these patients; nevertheless, thrombosis still occurs in many cases. Thus, the problem of assessing an adequate level of anticoagulation in ICU patients becomes evident during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the heparin resistance and the efficacy of heparin monitoring using an anti-Xa activity assay.

Methods

Thirty-seven heparin-treated patients admitted to ICU for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia were retrospectively studied for antifactor Xa activity (anti-Xa), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), Antithrombin, Fibrinogen, D-Dimer, Factor VIII, von Willebrand Factor, and the total daily amount of heparin administered. The correlation between APTT and anti-Xa was evaluated for unfractionated heparins (UFH). The correlations between the daily dose of UFH or the dosage expressed as IU/kg b.w. for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and anti-Xa were also evaluated.

Results

Twenty-one patients received calcium heparin, 8 sodium heparin, and 8 LMWH. A moderate correlation was found between APTT and anti-Xa for UFH. APTT did not correlate with coagulation parameters. 62% of UFH and 75% of LMWH treated patients were under the therapeutic range. About 75% of patients could be considered resistant to heparin.

Conclusions

SARS-COV2 pneumonia patients in ICU have frequently heparin resistance. Anti-Xa seems a more reliable method to monitor heparin treatment than APTT in acute patients, also because the assay is insensitive to the increased levels of fibrinogen, FVIII, and LAC that are common during the COVID-19 inflammatory state.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Dr Chiara Novelli has received lecture fees and consultancy fees from Instrumentation Laboratory-Werfen, outside the scope of the submitted work. The other authors have no competing interests.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.