Volume 61, Issue 11 pp. 1311-1324
Review

Treatments for AIDS/HIV-related Kaposi sarcoma: A systematic review of the literature

Yasmin Chia Chia Liew MBChB, MRCP (UK)

Yasmin Chia Chia Liew MBChB, MRCP (UK)

Department of Dermatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Yew Chong Steve Tam BSc

Yew Chong Steve Tam BSc

Department of Education Resource Centre, Medical Board, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Choon Chiat Oh MBBS, FRCP, MSc, MCI

Corresponding Author

Choon Chiat Oh MBBS, FRCP, MSc, MCI

Department of Dermatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore

Correspondence

Choon Chiat Oh, mbbs, frcp, msc, mci

Department of Dermatology,

Singapore General Hospital

Academia, Level 4, 20 College Road

Singapore 169856

Singapore

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 July 2022
Citations: 1

Conflict of interest: None.

Funding source: None.

Abstract

Background

Treatment guidelines are not well established in AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma (KS).

Objective

We aim to review the evidence on efficacy of treatments for AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma.

Methods

We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase Database from date of database inception till July 2020. Randomized controlled trials reporting intervention consisting of any type of treatment compared to control/placebo to a different treatment modality or different combination of treatment/treatment doses with a diagnosis of AIDS-related KS are selected.

Main outcomes and measures

Primary outcomes were response rates defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD). Secondary outcomes were cosmesis and adverse outcomes such as pain and erythema.

Results

Thirteen out of 536 articles met our eligibility criteria. Three studies reported the efficacy of chemotherapy, two studies looked at different doses of radiotherapy regimes, and three studies compared different antiretroviral therapy (ART) and chemotherapy regimens. Other studies reported topical therapies such as alitretinoin gel, IM862, and bHCG injection which showed varied efficacies.

Limitations

Lack of standardization classification of disease activity and clinical outcomes and treatment modalities precluded meaningful comparison of studies.

Conclusion

The evidence of efficacy of any particular intervention is overall varied and there was insufficient evidence to recommend any particular intervention. We have provided an overview of treatments for KS but larger studies need to be carried out to verify the efficacy of treatment options reported in the literature.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.