Volume 61, Issue 11 pp. 1346-1352
Review

The use of flutamide for the neoadjuvant treatment of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: a review of the literature comparing results by pubertal status and tumor stage

Graison Sitenga BS

Corresponding Author

Graison Sitenga BS

Division of Education, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA

Correspondence

Graison Sitenga, BS

Creighton University School of Medicine,

2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE, USA

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Granger BS

Peter Granger BS

Division of Education, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Keiffer Hepola BS

Keiffer Hepola BS

Division of Education, Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, Meridian, ID, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jenna Aird MD

Jenna Aird MD

Division of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Peter T. Silberstein MD

Peter T. Silberstein MD

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 November 2021
Citations: 2

Conflict of interest: None.

Funding source: None.

Abstract

Background

Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) is a rare but potentially life-threatening fibrovascular tumor that is seen almost exclusively in adolescent males and usually presents with symptoms of nasal obstruction or severe epistaxis. The current gold standard of treatment consists of complete surgical resection; however, this is inherently challenging because of the tumor’s invasive nature and a substantial risk of intraoperative hemorrhage. Flutamide, an anti-androgen antineoplastic agent, has been used preoperatively in attempts to reduce tumor volume allowing for surgical resection with more conservative procedural techniques and reduce intraoperative blood loss.

Methods

A literature review of PubMed and CINAHL was used to identify and analyze 29 male patients with JNA to determine the efficacy of the preoperative use of flutamide.

Results

Our analyses indicate that flutamide may be effective as a neoadjuvant agent by reducing tumor volume prior to resection in some patients but seemed to be more effective in the early stages of JNA without advanced tumor invasion. However, individual tumor response to flutamide was variable. Additionally, postpubertal patients seemed to demonstrate a greater reduction in tumor volume with flutamide compared to their prepubertal counterparts. Dosing regimen and side effects associated with flutamide therapy are also discussed.

Conclusion

Flutamide may be an effective neoadjuvant therapy in some cases of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma, but larger scale, case-control studies are likely needed to further expand on this conclusion. Postpubertal males with early-stage disease seemed to be the population that may benefit most from this treatment protocol.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.