Volume 28, Issue 2 pp. 662-669
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Vicarious growth among social work students: What makes the difference?

Anat Ben-Porat PhD

Corresponding Author

Anat Ben-Porat PhD

Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel

Correspondence

Anat Ben-Porat, Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Shelly Gottlieb MSW graduate

Shelly Gottlieb MSW graduate

Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
Tehila Refaeli PhD

Tehila Refaeli PhD

The Charlotte Jack Spitzer Department of Social Work, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
Shachar Shemesh MSW graduate

Shachar Shemesh MSW graduate

Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
Ronit Reuven Even Zahav PhD

Ronit Reuven Even Zahav PhD

Department of Social Work, School of Social and Community Science, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 November 2019
Citations: 9

Abstract

This study examined the contribution of background variables, personal factors (professional commitment) and environmental factors (peer support and supervision) to social work students' vicarious growth as an implication of their field practicums with trauma victims. Special emphasis was placed on examining the role of secondary traumatisation in the growth process. The sample consisted of 259 social work students at three social work schools in Israel. All students conducted their field practicums in social services and worked with trauma victims. The findings indicated that the mean level of growth was moderate and significant contribution was made by the student's year of study. Specifically, students in their third year of social work school showed more growth than did students in their first year. In addition, a positive contribution was made by the students’ supervision satisfaction, professional commitment and secondary traumatisation. The findings thus highlight the possibility of students' growth during their field practicums. In addition, the study emphasises the significant role played by supervisors in these practicums, in terms of both helping students grow as well as dealing with the distress they may feel during this part of their social work training.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.