Volume 26, Issue 4 pp. e497-e504
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Australian general practitioner attitudes to residential aged care facility visiting

Russell Pearson MBBS, FRACGP, FACRRM, Grad Cert Health Research

Corresponding Author

Russell Pearson MBBS, FRACGP, FACRRM, Grad Cert Health Research

Discipline of Graduate Medicine, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia

Correspondence

Russell Pearson, Discipline of Graduate Medicine, University of Wollongong and General Practitioner, Gerringong, NSW, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Judy Mullan PhD, FSHPA, BA, BPharm

Judy Mullan PhD, FSHPA, BA, BPharm

Discipline of Graduate Medicine, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Eniko Ujvary MD (Hungary), AMC, DRANZCOG

Eniko Ujvary MD (Hungary), AMC, DRANZCOG

Discipline of Graduate Medicine, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew Bonney MBBS, MFM (Clin), PhD, FRACGP

Andrew Bonney MBBS, MFM (Clin), PhD, FRACGP

Discipline of Graduate Medicine, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Bridget Dijkmans-Hadley BA (Population Health), MMedSci-Research

Bridget Dijkmans-Hadley BA (Population Health), MMedSci-Research

Discipline of Graduate Medicine, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 February 2018
Citations: 8

Abstract

Demographic trends suggest that the sustainability of the general practitioner (GP) Residential Aged Care Facility (RACF) workforce, worldwide and in Australia, is under threat, compromising the ongoing care of chronically ill RACF residents. It is therefore important to ascertain current GP attitudes towards this work, to better understand and hypothesise means of reversing this trend. To this end, during 2014 the views of 26 GPs and GP Registrars working in rural and regional New South Wales, Australia, were captured during focus group discussions and one-on-one interviews. Analysis of the qualitative date revealed that GP attitudes towards RACF visiting fell into five key themes: pleasure, duty, remuneration and logistics, hesitation, and frustration. The data also revealed that the overriding emotion GPs felt about RACF visitation was frustration with the avoidable delays and inefficiencies associated with the work. Despite the pleasure GPs derived from their work in RACFs and their sense of obligation to be involved, their hesitation and frustration was compounded by the work's perceived poor remuneration. This research suggests that the barriers to GP participation in RACF visiting were managerial rather than attitudinal, and that a strategic focus upon improving administrative and logistical support is needed.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that no conflicts of interest exist which could inappropriately influence this work.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.