Early View
Review

Pitfalls during histological assessment in locally resected pT1 colorectal cancer

Emma J Norton

Emma J Norton

Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Adrian C Bateman

Corresponding Author

Adrian C Bateman

Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK

Address for correspondence: Adrian C Bateman, Department of Cellular Pathology, MP002, Level E, South Block, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 February 2025

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignancy worldwide, and the stage of the tumour is closely related to clinical outcome. Bowel cancer screening programmes have resulted in the identification of colorectal cancer at earlier stages. Approximately 10% of patients with the earliest stage of CRC (i.e. pT1) will possess regional lymph node metastases (LNM). Therefore, if these patients have initially been treated by local resection (e.g. polypectomy), this subgroup will require surgical resection. Identification of pathological risk factors for LNM within locally resected pT1 CRC is a very important process during the histological assessment of these lesions. This paper describes the most commonly encountered and clinically significant difficulties in the histological assessment of these cases. These pitfalls are illustrated using four examples of locally resected pT1 CRC that were received by our department during routine diagnostic practice.

Graphical Abstract

This paper describes the most commonly encountered and clinically significant difficulties in the histological assessment of risk factors for regional lymph node metastases in locally resected early (i.e. pT1) colorectal cancer (CRC). These are illustrated using four examples that were received by our department during routine diagnostic practice.

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no relevant conflicts of interest.

Data availability statement

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.