The diversity of tumours with microsatellite instability: molecular mechanisms and impact upon microsatellite instability testing and mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry
Corresponding Author
Jinru Shia
Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Address for correspondence: J Shia, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center–Pathology, 1275 York Avenue, New York 10065-6007, NY, USA. e-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jinru Shia
Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Address for correspondence: J Shia, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center–Pathology, 1275 York Avenue, New York 10065-6007, NY, USA. e-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) as a distinct molecular phenotype in human neoplasms was first recognised in 1993. Since then there has been tremendous progress in our understanding of this phenotype, including its genomic drivers and functional consequences. Currently, the multiple lines of investigation on MSI seem to have converged upon one important facet: its diversity, both genotypically and phenotypically, and both within and across tumour types. This review article offers a pathologist’s perspective on our current understanding of this diversity, and highlights its potentially significant impact on the effective use of our current MSI detection tools: PCR- or sequencing-based MSI testing and mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry.
Conflicts of interest
None.
References
- 1Thibodeau SN, Bren G, Schaid D. Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon. Science 1993; 260; 816–819.
- 2Peltomaki P, Aaltonen LA, Sistonen P et al. Genetic mapping of a locus predisposing to human colorectal cancer. Science 1993; 260; 810–812.
- 3Ionov Y, Peinado MA, Malkhosyan S, Shibata D, Perucho M. Ubiquitous somatic mutations in simple repeated sequences reveal a new mechanism for colonic carcinogenesis. Nature 1993; 363; 558–561.
- 4Kelkar YD, Tyekucheva S, Chiaromonte F, Makova KD. The genome-wide determinants of human and chimpanzee microsatellite evolution. Genome. Res. 2008; 18; 30–38.
- 5Hile SE, Shabashev S, Eckert KA. Tumor-specific microsatellite instability: do distinct mechanisms underlie the MSI-l and EMAST phenotypes? Mutat. Res. 2013; 743–744; 67–77.
- 6Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR et al. A National Cancer Institute workshop on microsatellite instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1998; 58; 5248–5257.
- 7Markowitz S, Wang J, Myeroff L et al. Inactivation of the type II TGF-beta receptor in colon cancer cells with microsatellite instability. Science 1995; 268; 1336–1338.
- 8Abe T, Ouyang H, Migita T et al. The somatic mutation frequency of the transforming growth factor beta receptor type II gene varies widely among different cancers with microsatellite instability. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 1996; 22; 474–477.
- 9Toft NJ, Winton DJ, Kelly J et al. MSH2 status modulates both apoptosis and mutation frequency in the murine small intestine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1999; 96; 3911–3915.
- 10Cerretelli G, Ager A, Arends MJ, Frayling IM. Molecular pathology of Lynch syndrome. J. Pathol. 2020; 250(5); 518–531.
- 11Saeterdal I, Gjertsen MK, Straten P, Eriksen JA, Gaudernack G. A TGF betaRII frameshift-mutation-derived CTL epitope recognised by HLA-A2-restricted CD8+ T cells. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2001; 50; 469–476.
- 12Cortes-Ciriano I, Lee S, Park WY, Kim TM, Park PJ. A molecular portrait of microsatellite instability across multiple cancers. Nat. Commun. 2017; 8; 15180.
- 13Kim TM, Laird PW, Park PJ. The landscape of microsatellite instability in colorectal and endometrial cancer genomes. Cell 2013; 155; 858–868.
- 14Gurin CC, Federici MG, Kang L, Boyd J. Causes and consequences of microsatellite instability in endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1999; 59; 462–466.
- 15Jung B, Gomez J, Chau E et al. Activin signaling in microsatellite stable colon cancers is disrupted by a combination of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. PLoS One 2009; 4; e8308.
- 16Latham A, Srinivasan P, Kemel Y et al. Microsatellite instability is associated with the presence of Lynch syndrome pan-cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019; 37; 286–295.
- 17Yamamoto H, Imai K. An updated review of microsatellite instability in the era of next-generation sequencing and precision medicine. Semin. Oncol. 2019; 46; 261–270.
- 18Shia J, Zhang L, Shike M et al. Secondary mutation in a coding mononucleotide tract in MSH6 causes loss of immunoexpression of MSH6 in colorectal carcinomas with MLH1/PMS2 deficiency. Mod. Pathol. 2013; 26; 131–138.
- 19Mandal R, Samstein RM, Lee KW et al. Genetic diversity of tumors with mismatch repair deficiency influences anti-PD-1 immunotherapy response. Science 2019; 364; 485–491.
- 20Shibata D, Navidi W, Salovaara R, Li ZH, Aaltonen LA. Somatic microsatellite mutations as molecular tumor clocks. Nat. Med. 1996; 2; 676–681.
- 21Karamurzin Y, Zeng Z, Stadler ZK et al. Unusual DNA mismatch repair-deficient tumors in Lynch syndrome: a report of new cases and review of the literature. Hum. Pathol. 2012; 43; 1677–1687.
- 22Irrazabal T, Thakur BK, Kang M et al. Limiting oxidative DNA damage reduces microbe-induced colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Nat. Commun. 2020; 11; 1802.
- 23Yan Y, Drew DA, Markowitz A et al. Structure of the mucosal and stool microbiome in lynch syndrome. Cell Host Microbe 2020; 27(585–600); e584.
- 24Hirohata T, Asano K, Ogawa Y et al. DNA mismatch repair protein (MSH6) correlated with the responses of atypical pituitary adenomas and pituitary carcinomas to temozolomide: the national cooperative study by the Japan Society for Hypothalamic and Pituitary Tumors. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013; 98; 1130–1136.
- 25Bao F, Panarelli NC, Rennert H, Sherr DL, Yantiss RK. Neoadjuvant therapy induces loss of MSH6 expression in colorectal carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2010; 34; 1798–1804.
- 26Cahill DP, Levine KK, Betensky RA et al. Loss of the mismatch repair protein msh6 in human glioblastomas is associated with tumor progression during temozolomide treatment. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007; 13; 2038–2045.
- 27Lin AL, Jonsson P, Tabar V et al. Marked response of a hypermutated ACTH-secreting pituitary carcinoma to ipilimumab and nivolumab. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018; 103; 3925–3930.
- 28Pietrantonio F, Randon G, Romagnoli D, Di Donato S, Benelli M, de Braud F. Biomarker-guided implementation of the old drug temozolomide as a novel treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2020; 82; 101935.
- 29Carethers JM. Microsatellite instability pathway and EMAST in colorectal cancer. Curr. Colorect. Cancer Rep. 2017; 13; 73–80.
- 30Carethers JM, Koi M, Tseng-Rogenski SS. EMAST is a form of microsatellite instability that is initiated by inflammation and modulates colorectal cancer progression. Genes 2015; 6; 185–205.
- 31Phung TN, Lenkiewicz E, Malasi S et al. Unique genomic and neoepitope landscapes across tumors: a study across time, tissues, and space within a single Lynch syndrome patient. Sci. Rep. 2020; 10; 12190.
- 32Pecriaux A, Favre L, Calderaro J, Charpy C, Derman J, Pujals A. Detection of microsatellite instability in a panel of solid tumours with the Idylla MSI test using extracted DNA. J. Clin. Pathol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206581.
- 33Niu B, Ye K, Zhang Q et al. MSIsensor: microsatellite instability detection using paired tumor-normal sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30; 1015–1016.
- 34Middha S, Zhang L, Nafa K et al. Reliable pan-cancer microsatellite instability assessment by using targeted next-generation sequencing data. JCO Precis. Oncol. 2017; 2017; 1–17.
- 35Salipante SJ, Scroggins SM, Hampel HL, Turner EH, Pritchard CC. Microsatellite instability detection by next generation sequencing. Clin. Chem. 2014; 60; 1192–1199.
- 36Kautto EA, Bonneville R, Miya J et al. Performance evaluation for rapid detection of pan-cancer microsatellite instability with mantis. Oncotarget 2017; 8; 7452–7463.
- 37Zhu L, Huang Y, Fang X et al. A novel and reliable method to detect microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer by next-generation sequencing. J. Mol. Diagn. 2018; 20; 225–231.
- 38Pang J, Gindin T, Mansukhani M, Fernandes H, Hsiao S. Microsatellite instability detection using a large next-generation sequencing cancer panel across diverse tumour types. J. Clin. Pathol. 2020; 73; 83–89.
- 39Huang MN, McPherson JR, Cutcutache I, Teh BT, Tan P, Rozen SG. MSIseq: software for assessing microsatellite instability from catalogs of somatic mutations. Sci. Rep. 2015; 5; 13321.
- 40Nowak JA, Yurgelun MB, Bruce JL et al. Detection of mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability in colorectal adenocarcinoma by targeted next-generation sequencing. J. Mol. Diagn. 2017; 19; 84–91.
- 41Shia J. Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing for screening colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Part I. The utility of immunohistochemistry. J. Mol. Diagn. 2008; 10; 293–300.
- 42Evrard C, Tachon G, Randrian V, Karayan-Tapon L, Tougeron D. Microsatellite instability: diagnosis, heterogeneity, discordance, and clinical impact in colorectal cancer. Cancers 2019; 11; 1567.
- 43Stelloo E, Jansen AML, Osse EM et al. Practical guidance for mismatch repair-deficiency testing in endometrial cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2017; 28; 96–102.
- 44Cini G, Quaia M, Canzonieri V et al. Toward a better definition of EPCAM deletions in Lynch syndrome: report of new variants in Italy and the associated molecular phenotype. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2019; 7; e587.
- 45Ligtenberg MJ, Kuiper RP, Chan TL et al. Heritable somatic methylation and inactivation of MSH2 in families with lynch syndrome due to deletion of the 3' exons of TACSTD1. Nat. Genet. 2009; 41; 112–117.
- 46Sekine S, Ogawa R, Saito S et al. Cytoplasmic MSH2 immunoreactivity in a patient with Lynch syndrome with an EPCAM–MSH2 fusion. Histopathology 2017; 70; 664–669.
- 47Barbari SR, Shcherbakova PV. Replicative DNA polymerase defects in human cancers: consequences, mechanisms, and implications for therapy. DNA Repair 2017; 56; 16–25.
- 48Kloor M, Huth C, Voigt AY et al. Prevalence of mismatch repair-deficient crypt foci in lynch syndrome: a pathological study. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13; 598–606.
- 49Shia J, Stadler ZK, Weiser MR et al. Mismatch repair deficient-crypts in non-neoplastic colonic mucosa in lynch syndrome: insights from an illustrative case. Fam. Cancer 2015; 14; 61–68.
- 50Pai RK, Dudley B, Karloski E et al. DNA mismatch repair protein deficient non-neoplastic colonic crypts: a novel indicator of Lynch syndrome. Mod. Pathol. 2018; 31; 1608–1618.
- 51Gupta S, Provenzale D, Llor X et al. NCCN guidelines insights: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: colorectal, version 2.2019. J. Natl Compr. Cancer Netw. 2019; 17; 1032–1041.
- 52Raeker MO, Pierre-Charles J, Carethers JM. Tetranucleotide microsatellite mutational behavior assessed in real time: implications for future microsatellite panels. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020; 9; 689–704.