ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Of paradigms and power: British economic policy making since Thatcher
Abstract
How do ruling policy paradigms persist over time and why do they often undergo significant internal ideational changes? While the impact of Peter Hall's approach to policy paradigms on the study of governance has been immense, there is a burgeoning consensus that a “Kuhnian” understanding of paradigms makes punctuated equilibrium style shifts the only game in town. While Hall's approach can account for inter-paradigm change with reference to exogenous shocks, it does not allow for significant ideational shifts to occur intra-paradigm. To remedy this, we place ideational power dynamics at the heart of the study of policy paradigms. We demonstrate the general applicability of our approach by examining the evolution of British macroeconomic policy-making since 1990. We show how key policy-makers were able to employ their institutional and ideational power to reinterpret and redefine the dominant neoliberal understanding of the economy to match their own specific ideas and policy priorities.
REFERENCES
- Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 947–952.
- Baker, A. (2015). Varieties of economic crisis, varieties of ideational change: How and why macroeconomic policy and financial regulation differ. New Political Economy, 20(3), 342–366.
-
Ban, C. (2016). Ruling ideas. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190600389.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in international politics. International Organization, 59(4), 39–75.
- Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). Ideas and policy change. Governance, 26(2), 239–258.
-
Baumgartner, F. R., &
Jones, B. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics ( 2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226039534.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Béland, D. (2007). Ideas and institutional change in social security: Conversion, layering, and policy drift. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 20–38.
- Béland, D., Carstensen, M. B., & Seabrooke, L. (Eds.). (2016). Ideas, power and public policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 315–317.
- Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (2016). Ideas as coalition magnets: Coalition building, policy entrepreneurs, and power relations. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 428–445.
- Berman, S. (2013). Ideational theorizing in the social sciences since “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State.” Governance, 26(2), 217–237.
-
Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781139087230 Google Scholar
- Blyth, M. (2013). Paradigms and paradox: The politics of economic ideas in two moments of crisis. Governance, 26(2), 197–215.
- Blyth, M., & Matthijs, M. (2017). Black swans, lame ducks, and the mystery of IPE's missing macroeconomy. Review of International Political Economy 24(2), 203–231.
- Boswell, C., & Hampshire, J. (2017). Ideas and agency in immigration policy: A discursive institutionalist approach. European Journal of Political Research, 56, 133–150.
- Campbell, J. L. (1998). Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory and Society, 27(3), 377–409.
- Carstensen, M. B. (2011a). Ideas are not as stable as political scientists want them to be: A theory of incremental ideational change. Political Studies, 59(3), 596–615.
- Carstensen, M. B. (2011b). Paradigm man vs. the bricoleur: An alternative vision of agency in ideational change. European Political Science Review, 3(1), 147–167.
- Carstensen, M., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337.
- Clift, B., & Tomlinson, J. (2007). Credible Keynesianism? New Labour macroeconomic policy and the political economy of coarse tuning. British Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 47–69.
- Conservative Party. (2005). Are you thinking what we're thinking? It's time for action. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/11_04_05_conservative_manifesto.pdf
- Conservative Party. (2010). Invitation to join the government of Britain. Retrieved from http://www.politicsresources.net/area/uk/ge10/man/parties/consmanifesto2010_hires.pdf
- Culpepper, P. (2008). The politics of common knowledge: Ideas and institutional change in wage bargaining. International Organization, 62(1), 1–33.
- Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215.
- European Commission. (2016). Ameco database. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/ameco/user/serie/SelectSerie.cfm
- Eurostat. (2016). Database. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
-
Gamble, A. (2005). The meaning of the third way. In A. Seldon & D. Kavanagh (Eds.), The Blair effect 2001–5 (pp. 430–438). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511490804.024 Google Scholar
- Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.
- Hay, C. (1999). The political economy of New Labour. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
- Hay, C. (2011a). Pathology without crisis? The strange demise of the Anglo-Liberal growth model. Government and Opposition, 46(1), 1–31.
-
Hay, C. (2011b). Britain and the global financial crisis: The return of boom and bust. In P. Cowley, R. Heffernan, & C. Hay (Eds.), Developments in British politics (pp. 238–256). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.1007/978-0-230-34397-9_13 Google Scholar
-
Heffernan, R. (2001). New Labour and Thatcherism. New York: Palgrave.
10.1057/9780230598430 Google Scholar
-
Jenson, J. (2010). Diffusing ideas for after neoliberalism. Global Social Policy, 10(1), 59–84.
10.1177/1468018109354813 Google Scholar
-
Johnson, P., &
Chandler, D. (2015). The coalition and the economy. In A. Seldon & M. Finn (Eds.), The coalition effect 2010–2015 (pp. 159–193). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781139946551.007 Google Scholar
- Keegan, W. (2004). The prudence of Mr. Gordon Brown. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
- Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies ( 2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
- Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions ( 2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Labour Party. (1997). New Labour because Britain deserves better. Retrieved from http://www.politicsresources.net/area/uk/man/man97.htm
- Labour Party. (2010). A future fair for all. Retrieved from http://www.politicsresources.net/area/uk/ge10/man10.htm
-
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: MacMillan.
10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 Google Scholar
- Matthijs, M. (2011). Ideas and economic crises in Britain from Attlee to Blair. New York: Routledge.
- Matthijs, M. (2016). Powerful rules governing the euro: The perverse logic of German ideas. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 375–391.
- Matthijs, M., & McNamara, K. (2015). The euro crisis' theory effect: Northern saints, southern sinners, and the demise of the Eurobond. Journal of European Integration, 37(2), 229–245.
- Oliver, M. J., & Pemberton, H. (2004). Learning and change in 20th-century British economic policy. Governance, 17(3), 415–441.
-
Parsons, C. (2007). How to map arguments in political science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oso/9780199286676.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.
- V. A. Schmidt and T Mark. (Eds.). (2013). Resilient liberalism in Europe's political economy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781139857086 Google Scholar
-
Seldon, A. (2005). The second Blair government: The verdict. In S. Anthony & K. Dennis (Eds.), The Blair effect 2001–5 (pp. 410–429). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511490804.019 Google Scholar
- Widmaier, W. W., Blyth, M., & Seabrooke, L. (2007). Exogenous shocks or endogenous constructions? The meanings of wars and crises. International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 747–759.
- Wilder, M. (2015). Ideas beyond paradigms: relative commensurability and the case of Canadian trade-industrial policy, 1975–1995. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(7), 1004–1021.
-
Wilder, M., &
Howlett, M. (2014). The politics of policy anomalies: Bricolage and the Hermeneutics of paradigms. Critical Policy Studies, 8(2), 183–202.
10.1080/19460171.2014.901175 Google Scholar
- Wood, M. (2015). Puzzling and powering in policy paradigm shifts: Politicization, depoliticization and social learning. Critical Policy Studies, 9(1), 2–21.
