On the interaction of normal and shear stresses in multiaxial fatigue damage
Shahriar Sharifimehr
Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606 USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ali Fatemi
Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152 USA
Correspondence
Ali Fatemi, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorShahriar Sharifimehr
Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606 USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ali Fatemi
Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152 USA
Correspondence
Ali Fatemi, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
One of the important issues in assessing multiaxial fatigue damage is interactions between different components of stress such as normal and shear stresses. The present study investigated this interaction effect on the fatigue behavior of materials with shear failure mode when subjected to multiaxial loading conditions. A method is introduced to model this interaction based on the idea that two types of influence are caused by the normal stress acting on the critical plane orientation. These two types of influence are affecting roughness induced closure, as well as fluctuating normal stress which affects the growth of small cracks in mode II. Shear-based critical plane damage models which use normal stress as a secondary input, such as FS damage model, could then use the summation of these terms. In order to investigate the effect of the method, constant amplitude load paths with different levels of interaction between the normal and shear stresses, as well as variable amplitude tests with histories both taken from service loading conditions and generated using random numbers were designed for an experimental program. The proposed method was observed to result in improved fatigue life estimations where significant interactions between normal and shear stresses exist.
REFERENCES
- 1Stephens RI, Fatemi A, Stephens RR, Fuchs HO. Metal Fatigue in Engineering. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
- 2Wu HC, Yang C. On the influence of strain path in multiaxial fatigue failure. J Eng Mater Technol. 1987; 109(2): 107-115.
- 3Kurath P, Jiang Y, Fatemi A. Strain-path influence on multiaxial deformation and fatigue damage. Multiaxial Fatigue, SAE AE-28, 1999: 117–140.
- 4Jordan EH, Brown MW, Miller KJ. Fatigue under severe nonproportional loading. In: KJ Miller, MW Brown, eds. Multiaxial Fatigue. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International STP 853, ASTM International; 1985: 569-585.
10.1520/STP36243S Google Scholar
- 5Gates NR, Fatemi A. On the consideration of normal and shear stress interaction in multiaxial fatigue damage analysis. Int J Fatigue. 2017; 100: 322-336.
- 6Subramaninan S, Fatemi A. Strain-path influence on multiaxial fatigue cracking. In: H Kitagawa, T Tanaka, eds. Fatigue 90, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Fatigue and Fatigue Thresholds. Birmingham, UK: Materials and Component Engineering Publications; Vol. 1; 1990: 399-404.
- 7Wang C, Brown M. A path-independent parameter for fatigue under proportional and non-proportional loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 1993; 16(12): 1285-1297.
- 8Wang C, Brown M. Life prediction techniques for variable amplitude multiaxial fatigue—part 1: theories. J Eng Mater Technol. 1996; 118(3): 367-370.
- 9Wang Y, Susmel L. The Modified Manson–Coffin Curve method to estimate fatigue lifetime under complex constant and variable amplitude multiaxial fatigue loading. Int J Fatigue. 2016; 83: 135-149.
- 10Susmel L, Meneghetti G, Atzori B. A simple and efficient reformulation of the classical Manson–Coffin curve to predict lifetime under multiaxial fatigue loading—part I: plain materials. J Eng Mater Technol. 2009; 131(2):021009.
- 11Wang Y, Faruq NZ, Susmel L. Evaluation of different techniques in estimating orientation of crack initiation planes and fatigue lifetime under complex multiaxial loading paths. Int J Fatigue. 2017; 100: 521-529.
- 12Kim K, Park J, Lee J. Multiaxial fatigue under variable amplitude loads. J Eng Mater Technol. 1999; 121(3): 286-293.
- 13Shamsaei N, Fatemi A, Socie DF. Multiaxial fatigue evaluation using discriminating strain paths. Int J Fatigue. 2011; 33(4): 597-609.
- 14Shamsaei N, Gladskyi M, Panasovskyi K, Shukaev S, Fatemi A. Multiaxial fatigue of titanium including step loading and load path alteration and sequence effects. Int J Fatigue. 2010; 32(11): 1862-1874.
- 15Fatemi A, Socie DF. A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 1988; 11(3): 149-165.
- 16Kim K, Lee B, Park J. Biaxial fatigue of stainless steel 304 under irregular loading. In: GR Halford, JP Gallagher, eds. Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics: 31st Volume. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International STP 1389, ASTM International; 2000: 79-93.
10.1520/STP14795S Google Scholar
- 17Lopez-Crespo P, Moreno B, Lopez-Moreno A, Zapatero J. Study of crack orientation and fatigue life prediction in biaxial fatigue with critical plane models. Eng Fract Mech. 2015; 136: 115-130.
- 18Han C, Chen X, Kim K. Evaluation of multiaxial fatigue criteria under irregular loading. Int J Fatigue. 2002; 24(9): 913-922.
- 19Jiang Y, Hertel O, Vormwald M. An experimental evaluation of three critical plane multiaxial fatigue criteria. Int J Fatigue. 2007; 29(8): 1490-1502.
- 20Park J, Nelson D. Evaluation of an energy-based approach and a critical plane approach for predicting constant amplitude multiaxial fatigue life. Int J Fatigue. 2000; 22(1): 23-39.
- 21Kim K, Park J. Shear strain based multiaxial fatigue parameters applied to variable amplitude loading. Int J Fatigue. 1999; 21(5): 475-483.
- 22Chen X, An K, Kim K. Low-cycle fatigue of 1Cr–18Ni–9Ti stainless steel and related weld metal under axial, torsional and 90° out-of-phase loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2004; 27(6): 439-448.
- 23Yu ZY, Zhu SP, Liu Q, Liu Y. A new energy-critical plane damage parameter for multiaxial fatigue life prediction of turbine blades. Materials. 2017; 10(5): 513.
- 24Gates NR, Fatemi A. Friction and roughness induced closure effects on shear-mode crack growth and branching mechanisms. Int J Fatigue. 2016; 92: 442-458.
- 25 ASTM-E1049-85. Standard practices for cycle counting in fatigue analysis. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Vol. 03.01; 2017.
- 26Bannantine JA, Socie DF. A variable amplitude multiaxial fatigue life prediction method. Third International Conference on Biaxial/Multiaxial Fatigue. 1989.
- 27Bannantine JA, Socie DF. A multiaxial fatigue life estimation technique. In: MR Mitchell, RW Landgraf, eds. Advances in Fatigue Lifetime Predictive Techniques. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International STP 1122, ASTM International; 1992: 249-275.
- 28Hoshide T, Socie DF. Mechanics of mixed mode small fatigue crack growth. Eng Fract Mech. 1987; 26(6): 841-850.
- 29Wong S, Bold P, Brown M, Allen R. A branch criterion for shallow angled rolling contact fatigue cracks in rails. Wear. 1996; 191(1–2): 45-53.
- 30Wong S, Bold P, Brown M, Allen R. Fatigue crack growth rates under sequential mixed-mode I and II loading cycles. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2000; 23(8): 667-674.
- 31Doquet V, Pommier S. Fatigue crack growth under non-proportional mixed-mode loading in ferritic-pearlitic steel. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2004; 27(11): 1051-1060.
- 32Fatemi A, Molaei R, Sharifimehr S, Phan N, Shamsaei N. Multiaxial fatigue behavior of wrought and additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V including surface finish effect. Int J Fatigue. 2017; 100: 347-366.
- 33 ASTM-E2207-15. Standard practice for strain-controlled axial-torsional fatigue testing with thin-walled tubular specimens. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Vol. 03.01; 2017.
- 34Sharifimehr S, Fatemi A. Fatigue analysis of ductile and brittle behaving steels under variable amplitude multiaxial loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2019.
- 35Gates NR, Fatemi A. Multiaxial variable amplitude fatigue life analysis using the critical plane approach, part I: un-notched specimen experiments and life estimations. Int J Fatigue. 2017; 105: 283-295.
- 36Fatemi A, Stephens RI. Biaxial fatigue of 1045 steel under in-phase and 90 degree out-of-phase loading conditions. Multiaxial Fatigue: Analysis and Experiment. 1989: 121–137.
- 37Zhao T, Jiang Y. Fatigue of 7075-T651 aluminum alloy. Int J Fatigue. 2008; 30(5): 834-849.
- 38Koch JL. Proportional and nonproportional biaxial fatigue of Inconel 718. M.S. Thesis, Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinios at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL; 1985.
- 39Armstrong PJ, Frederick C. A Mathematical Representation of the Multiaxial Bauschinger Effect. Berkeley: Central Electricity Generating Board [and] Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, Research & Development Department; 1966.
- 40Chaboche J, Van KD, Cordier G. Modelization of the strain memory effect on the cyclic hardening of 316 stainless steel. In: Transactions of the Fifth International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology. L11/3. Div. L, Berlin; 1979.
- 41Chaboche J. Cyclic plasticity modeling and ratchetting effects. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Constitutive Laws for Engineering Materials: Theory and Applications. Vol. 1 Tuscon, Arizona: Elsevier; 1987: 47-58.
- 42Tanaka E. A nonproportionality parameter and a cyclic viscoplastic constitutive model taking into account amplitude dependences and memory effects of isotropic hardening. Eur J Mech A-Solid. 1994; 13: 155-173.
- 43Jiang Y, Sehitoglu H. Modeling of cyclic ratchetting plasticity, part I: development of constitutive relations. J Appl Mech. 1996; 63(3): 720-725.
- 44Jiang Y, Sehitoglu H. Modeling of cyclic ratchetting plasticity, part II: comparison of model simulations with experiments. J Appl Mech. 1996; 63(3): 726-733.
- 45Gates NR, Fatemi A. A simplified cyclic plasticity model for calculating stress-strain response under multiaxial non-proportional loadings. Eur J Mech A-Solid. 2016; 59: 344-355.
- 46Matsuishi M, Endo T. Fatigue of metals subjected to varying stress. Paper Presented to the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fukuako, Japan. 1968.
- 47Sonsino CM. Fatigue testing under variable amplitude loading. Int J Fatigue. 2007; 29(6): 1080-1089.
- 48Buxbaum O. Structural Durability—Safe and Economic Design of Fatigue Components. Düsseldorf: Verlag Stahleisen; 1992.
- 49Haibach E. Structural Durability—Methods and Data for Calculation. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag; 2003.
- 50Sonsino CM. Principles of variable amplitude fatigue design and testing. In: PC McKeighan, N Ranganathan, eds. Fatigue Testing and Analysis Under Variable Amplitude Loading Conditions. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International STP 1439, ASTM International; 2005: 3-23.
10.1520/STP11294S Google Scholar
- 51Sonsino CM, Franz R. Multiaxial fatigue of cast aluminium EN AC-42000 T6 (G-AlSi7Mg0. 3 T6) for automotive safety components under constant and variable amplitude loading. Frattura Ed Integrità Strutturale. 2016; 10(37): 200-206.
- 52Sonsino CM, Kaufmann H, Grubišić V. Transferability of material data for the example of a randomly loaded forged truck stub axle. SAE Trans. 1997; 649-670.
- 53Haibach E, Analytical strength assessment of componentsin mechanical engineering: FKM guideline. 2003.
- 54Rice RCE. SAE Fatigue Design Handbook: AE-22. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1997.
- 55Colin J, Fatemi A. Variable amplitude cyclic deformation and fatigue behaviour of stainless steel 304L including step, periodic, and random loadings. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2010; 33(4): 205-220.
- 56Colin J, Fatemi A, Taheri S. Cyclic hardening and fatigue behavior of stainless steel 304L. J Mater Sci. 2011; 46(1): 145-154.
- 57Socie D, Marquis G. Multiaxial Fatigue. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1999.
10.4271/R-234 Google Scholar