Complexity in Families
Adoptive Parenting Cognitions in the Era of Open Adoption: Is Shared Fate Theory Still Relevant?
Albert Y. H. Lo,
Krystal K. Cashen, Harold D. Grotevant,
Corresponding Author
Albert Y. H. Lo
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
University of Massachusetts Amherst; Tobin Hall, 135 Hicks Way, Amherst, MA 01003 ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorAlbert Y. H. Lo,
Krystal K. Cashen, Harold D. Grotevant,
Corresponding Author
Albert Y. H. Lo
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
University of Massachusetts Amherst; Tobin Hall, 135 Hicks Way, Amherst, MA 01003 ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Objective
To reexamine shared fate theory by validating the original measure of “acknowledgment of differences” (AOD) and testing the theory's relations in the current era of open adoptions.
Background
Shared fate theory states adoptive parents who acknowledge differences between adoptive and nonadoptive parenthood are better able to empathize with their child and promote open communication about adoption. The theory has not been validated in the context of modern adoption practices, such as birth family contact.
Method
Confirmatory factor analyses examined the validity of the original measure of AOD using a sample of 190 adoptive mothers whose families varied in level of birth family contact. Regression analyses examined the relation between AOD and empathy and communication 8 years later, as well as whether level of birth family contact moderated these relations.
Results
Results provided evidence for the validity of the measure of AOD. AOD in mothers significantly predicted empathy and communication 8 years later, with little evidence for moderation by level of birth family contact.
Conclusion
AOD has implications for parenting practices and remains an important adoptive parenting cognition, regardless of level of birth family contact.
Implications
AOD is a still relevant area of intervention for practitioners working with adoptive families.
References
- Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1985). Attachment across the life span. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Music, 61(9), 792–812.
- Anderson, K. N., Rueter, M. A., & Lee, R. M. (2015). Discussions about racial and ethnic differences in internationally adoptive families: Links with family engagement, warmth, & control. Journal of Family Communication, 15(4), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2015.1076420
- Baden, A. L., Gibbons, J. L., Wilson, S. L., & McGinnis, H. (2013). International adoption: Counseling and the adoption triad. Adoption Quarterly, 16(3–4), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2013.794440
10.1080/10926755.2013.794440 Google Scholar
- Bornstein, M. H., Putnick, D. L., & Suwalsky, J. T. (2018). Parenting cognitions → parenting practices → child adjustment? The standard model. Development and psychopathology, 30(2), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579417000931
- Brodzinsky, D. M. (1987). Adjustment to adoption: A psychosocial perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 7(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(87)90003-1
- Brodzinsky, D. M. (2005). Reconceptualizing openness in adoption: Implications for theory, research, and practice. In D. M. Brodzinsky & J. Palacios (Eds.), Advances in applied developmental psychology. Psychological issues in adoption: Research and practice (pp. 145–166). Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.
- Brodzinsky, D. (2006). Family structural openness and communication openness as predictors in the adjustment of adopted children. Adoption Quarterly, 9(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1300/j145v09n04_01
10.1300/J145v09n04_01 Google Scholar
- Cashen, K. K., Altamari, D. K., Grotevant, H. D., & McRoy, R. G. (2019). Hearing the voices of young adult adoptees: Perspectives on adoption agency practice. Child Welfare, 97(4), 1–22.
- Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2018). Providing adoption support and preservation services. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children's Bureau. https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/f_postadoptbulletin.pdf
- Cicchetti, D. V. (1976). Assessing inter-rater reliability for rating scales: Resolving some basic issues. British Journal of Psychiatry, 129(5), 452–456. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.129.5.452
- Crolley-Simic, J., & Vonk, M. E. (2011). White international transracial adoptive mothers' reflections on race. Child & Family Social Work, 16(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00729.x
- Grotevant, H. D., & McRoy, R. G. (1997). The Minnesota/Texas Adoption Research Project: Implications of openness in adoption for development and relationship. Applied Developmental Science, 1(4), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0104_2
10.1207/s1532480xads0104_2 Google Scholar
- Grotevant, H. D., & McRoy, R. G. (1998). Openness in adoption: Exploring family connections. Sage Publications.
- Grotevant, H. D., Ross, N. M., Marchel, M. A., & McRoy, R. G. (1999). Adaptive behavior in adopted children: Predictors from early risk, collaboration in relationships within the adoptive kinship network, and openness arrangements. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558499142005
- Grotevant, H. D., Rueter, M., Von Korff, L., & Gonzalez, C. (2011). Post-adoption contact, adoption communicative openness, and satisfaction with contact as predictors of externalizing behavior in adolescence and emerging adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(5), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02330.x
- Grotevant, H. D., Wrobel, G. M., Von Korff, L., Skinner, B., Newell, J., Friese, S., & McRoy, R. G. (2007). Many faces of openness in adoption: Perspectives of adopted adolescents and their parents. Adoption Quarterly, 10(3–4), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926750802163204
10.1080/10926750802163204 Google Scholar
- Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Jones, C., & Hackett, S. (2007). Communicative openness within adoptive families: Adoptive parents' narrative accounts of the challenges of adoption talk and the approaches used to manage these challenges. Adoption Quarterly, 10(3–4), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926750802163238
10.1080/10926750802163238 Google Scholar
- Kaye, K. (1990). Acknowledgement or rejection of differences? In D. M. Brodzinsky & M. D. Schechter (Eds.), The psychology of adoption (pp. 121–143). Oxford University Press.
- Kirk, H. D. (1964). Shared fate: A theory and method of adoptive relationships. Free Press.
- Kirk, H. D. (1981). Adoptive kinship: A modern institution in need of reform. Butterworth & Co.
- Kirk, H. D. (1984). Shared fate: A theory and method of adoptive relationships (rev. ed.). Ben-Simon Publications.
- Kirk, H. D., & McDaniel, S. A. (1984). Adoption policy in Great Britain and North America. Journal of Social Policy, 13(1), 75–84. http://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279400022832
- Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling ( 4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
- Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
- Lee, R. M. (2003). The transracial adoption paradox: History, research, and counseling implications of cultural socialization. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(6), 711–744. http://doi.org/10.1177/0011000003258087
- Lee, R. M., Grotevant, H. D., Hellerstedt, W. L., Gunnar, M. R., & Minnesota International Adoption Project Team. (2006). Cultural socialization in families with internationally adopted children. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(4), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.20.4.571
- Lo, A. Y. H. & Cashen, K. K. (2020). How adoptive parents think about their role as parents. In E. Helder, E. Marr, & G. Wrobel (Eds.), Routledge handbook of adoption (pp. 278–290). Routledge.
10.4324/9780429432040-20 Google Scholar
- Lo, A. Y. H., & Grotevant, H. D. (2020). Adoptive parenting cognitions: Acknowledgement of differences as a predictor of adolescents' attachment to parents. Parenting: Science and Practice, 20(2), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2019.1694826
- MacDonald, M., & McSherry, D. (2011). Open adoption: Adoptive parents' experiences of birth family contact and talking to their child about adoption. Adoption & Fostering, 35(3), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/030857591103500302
10.1177/030857591103500302 Google Scholar
- Marr, E. (2017). U.S. transracial adoption trends in the 21st century. Adoption Quarterly, 20(3), 222–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2017.1291458
- McGinnis, H. (2012). All grown up: Rise of the Korean adult adoptee movement and implications for practice. In J. L. Gibbons & K. Smith Rotabi (Eds.), Intercountry adoption: Policies, practices, and outcomes (pp. 293–300). Ashgate Publishing Company.
- McRoy, R. G., Grotevant, H. D., & White, K. L. (1988). Openness in adoption: New practices, new issues. Praeger.
- McRoy, R. G., Grotevant, H. D., & Zurcher, L. A. Jr. (1988). Emotional disturbance in adopted adolescents: Origins and development. Praeger Publishers.
- Meins, E. (2013). Sensitive attunement to infants' internal states: operationalizing the construct of mind-mindedness. Attachment & Human Development, 15(5–6), 524–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2013.830388
- Meunier, J.C., Roskam, I., & Browne, D.T. (2010). Relations between parenting and child behavior: Exploring the child's personality and parental self-efficacy as third variables. International Journal of Behavior Development, 35(3), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410382950
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user's guide ( 7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén
- Neil, E. (2009). Post-adoption contact and openness in adoptive parents' minds: Consequences for children's development. British Journal of Social Work, 39(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm087
- Neil, E., Grotevant, H. D., & Young, J. (2007). Adoption communicative openness coding manual v. 5. Unpublished manuscript, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
- Palacios, J., & Brodzinsky, D. (2010). Adoption research: Trends, topics, outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(3), 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410362837
- Pinderhughes, E. E. (2019). Promoting adoptees' well-being in transracial adoptive families. Rudd Adoption Research Program Publication Series: The Future of Adoption. University of Massachusetts Amherst. https://www.umass.edu/ruddchair/sites/default/files/rudd.pinderhughes.pdf
- Rosenbaum, S.I. (2018, August 4). The twilight of closed adoptions. Boston Globe. https://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2018/08/04/the-twilight-closed-adoptions/1Iu4c5da4W5qNbIPn5IEmL/story.html?event=event12
- Samuels, G. M. (2009). “Being raised by White people”: Navigating racial difference among adopted multiracial adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00581.x
- Selman, P. (2009). The rise and fall of intercountry adoption in the 21st century. International Social Work, 52(5), 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872809337681
- Siegel, D. H., & Smith, S. L. (2012). Openness in adoption: From secrecy and stigma to knowledge and connections. Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute. http://adoptioninstitute.org/publications/2012_03_OpennessInAdoption.pdf
- Soares, J., Barbosa Ducharne, M., Palacios González, J., & Pacheco, A. (2017). Adopted children's emotion regulation: The role of parental attitudes and communication about adoption. Psicothema, 29(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.71
- Sobol, M. P., Delaney, S., & Earn, B. M. (1994). Adoptees' portrayal of the development of family structure. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 23(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01536726
- Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
- Vandivere, S., Malm, K., & Radel, L. (2009). Adoption USA: A chartbook based on the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/75911/index.pdf
- Von Korff, L., & Grotevant, H.D. (2011). Contact in adoption and adoptive identity formation: The mediating role of family conversation. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(3), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023388
- Wegar, K. (2000). Adoption, family ideology, and social stigma: Bias in community attitudes, adoption research, and practice. Family Relations, 49(4), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00363.x
- Whitesel, A., & Howard, J.A. (2013). Untangling the web II: A research-based roadmap for reform. Donaldson Adoption Institute. https://www.adoptioninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/2013_12_UntanglingtheWeb2.pdf
