RESEARCH ARTICLE
Power dynamics in Australian public sector accounting reform: A Machiavellian interpretation
Ching Chau,
Corresponding Author
Ching Chau
College of Finance & Information, Ningbo University of Finance & Economics, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
Correspondence
Ching Chau, College of Finance & Information, Ningbo University of Finance & Economics, 899 Xuanyuan Road, Haishu District, Ningbo 315175, Zhejiang, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorChing Chau,
Corresponding Author
Ching Chau
College of Finance & Information, Ningbo University of Finance & Economics, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
Correspondence
Ching Chau, College of Finance & Information, Ningbo University of Finance & Economics, 899 Xuanyuan Road, Haishu District, Ningbo 315175, Zhejiang, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
During the era of New Public Management from the 1970s to the 1990s, government accountability in Australia underwent a significant transformation from compliance to performance evaluation. This change underscores a Machiavellian interpretation presented in this paper, emphasizing the politicized and power-driven nature of public sector accounting reforms. The Australian Government employed a commercial accounting model to legitimize these reforms, leveraging Machiavellian principles to strengthen political power. Despite the accounting profession's role in legitimizing public sector financial reporting, its control over Australian accounting standard setting diminished. The new public sector accountability framework allowed the shifting of blame to the profession when problems arose. An analysis of the New South Wales Government's journey through the reform, from embracing accrual accounting to rejecting heritage assets measurement and applauding fair value, illustrates the complex interplay between self-interest and the protection of public interest. The Australian Government strategically enlisted the support of the outer fringe accounting profession and successfully instituted reforms premised on the principle of public accountability and liberty for Australian society. Once the reformer's goals were achieved, the facilitating elites found themselves marginalized from the bureaucratic group and power reclaimed deftly to the Government with CLERP reforms paving the way for the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards. This shift exemplifies Machiavelli's perspective, where liberty is used as a means to garner public support and ultimately attain power, a strategy that continues to hold validity in contemporary political contexts.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
REFERENCES
- AARF. (1987a). ED 42A objective of financial reporting. Australian Accounting Research Foundation.
- AARF. (1987b). ED 42C definition and recognition of assets. Australian Accounting Research Foundation.
- AARF. (1993). The development of statements of accounting concepts and accounting standards (Policy Statement 1). Australian Accounting Research Foundation.
- AASB. (2001). AASB 1041 revaluation of non-current assets. Australian Accounting Standards Board.
- AASB. (2004). AASB 116 property, plant and equipment. Australian Accounting Standards Board.
- Australian Public Service Commission. (2003). Australia experience of public sector reform. Commonwealth of Australia.
- Bagozzi, R. P., Verbeke, W. J. M. I., Dietvorst, R. C., Belschak, F. D., & Rietdijk, W. J. R. (2017). Theory of mind and empathic explanations of Machiavellianism: A neuroscience perspective. Journal of Management, 39(7), 1760–1798.
10.1177/0149206312471393 Google Scholar
- Barton, A. D. (1999). Accounting for public heritage facilities—assets or liabilities of the government? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(2), 219–235.
10.1108/09513570010323434 Google Scholar
- Barton, A. D. (2006). Public sector accountability and commercial-in-confidence outsourcing contracts. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(2), 256–271.
10.1108/09513570610656114 Google Scholar
- Bolívar, M. P. R., & Galera, A. N. (2012). The Role of Fair Value Accounting in Promoting Government Accountability, Abacus, 48(3), 348–386.
10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00352.x Google Scholar
- Canning, J. B. (1929). The economics of accountancy. Ronald Press Company.
- Carnegie, G. D., & Wolnizer, P. W. (1995). The financial value of cultural heritage and scientific collections: An accounting fiction. Australian Accounting Review, 5(1), 31–47.
10.1111/j.1835-2561.1995.tb00164.x Google Scholar
- CLERP. (1997). Corporate Law Economic Reform Program, proposals for reform. In Accounting standard: Building international opportunities for Australian business, Australia Paper No. 1 (1997). CLERP.
- Christensen, M. (2003). Without ‘reinventing the wheel’: Business accounting applied to the public sector. Australian Accounting Review, 13(2), 22–27.
10.1111/j.1835-2561.2003.tb00396.x Google Scholar
- Christensen, M., Newberry, S., & Potter, B. N. (2019). Enabling global accounting change: Epistemic communities and the creation of a ‘more business-like’ public sector. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 58(2019), 53–76.
10.1016/j.cpa.2018.04.006 Google Scholar
- Christensen, M., & Rocher, S. (2021). Phantom images in public sector accounting reform: A French study. Association Francophone de Comptabilité, 27(2021), 159–187.
- Chua, W. F., & Sinclair, A. (1994). Interests and the profession-state dynamic: Explaining the emergence of the Australian public sector accounting standard board. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 21(5), 669–705.
10.1111/j.1468-5957.1994.tb00343.x Google Scholar
- Commonwealth of Australia. (1994). Guidelines on Accounting Policy for Valuation of Assets of Government Trading Enterprises, Using Current Valuation Method, Melbourne, Australia.
- Constitution Act 1902. (2022). Commonwealth of Australia.
- Coby, J. P. (2021). Machiavelli on liberty. Government Faculty Publications. https://scholarworks.smith.edu/gov_facpubs/43
- Corporations Act. (1991). Available at: https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca2001172/ (Accessed: 20/1/2024)
- Dabbicco, G. (2015). The impact of accrual-based public accounting harmonization on EU macroeconomic surveillance and governments’ policy. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(4), 253–267.
10.1080/01900692.2015.999581 Google Scholar
- Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215.
- Danél, A. D. (1997). A case for freedom: Machiavellian humanism. University Press of America.
- Department of Finance. (1990). Guidelines for financial statements of commonwealth entities. Department of Finance.
- Department of Finance. (1993). Annual report 1992–1993. Department of Finance.
- Department of Finance. (1997). Financial statements of Commonwealth Department, guidelines issued by the honourable John Fahey Minister for Finance, Australia. Department of Finance.
- Department of Finance and Administration. (2003). Requirement and guidance for the preparation of financial statements of Commonwealth agencies and authorities. Commonwealth of Australia.
- Edwards, E. U., & Bell, P. W. (1961). The theory and measurement of business income. University of California Press.
10.1525/9780520340626 Google Scholar
- Edwards, J. R. (2021). Cash to accruals accounting in British central government: A journey through time. Financial Accountability & Management, 39(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12295
- Emy, H. V., & Hughes, O. E. (1988). Australian politics: Realities in conflict. The Macmillian Company of Australia Pty Ltd.
- Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The Birth of the prison. Random House Vintage Books.
- Foucault, M. (1982). The subject of power. In H. Dreyfus, & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
10.1086/448181 Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
- Ferri, P., Sidaway, S. I. L., & Carnegie, G. D. (2021). The paradox of accounting for cultural heritage: a longitudinal study on the financial reporting of heritage assets of major Australian public cultural institutions (1992–2019). Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(4), 983–1012.
- Ferry, L., & Midgley, H. (2022). Democracy, accountability and audit: The creation of the UK NAO as a defence of liberty. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 35(2), 413–438.
- Free, C., Radcliffe, V. S., Spence, C., & Stein, M. J. (2020). Auditing and the development of the modern state. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37, 485–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12497
- Frey, B. S. (1994). Cultural Economics and Museum Behaviour. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 41(3), 325–335.
- Fuller, D., & Roffey, B. (1993). Improving public sector accountability and strategic decision-making. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 52(2), 14–163.
- Funnell, W. (2001). Government by Fiat. University of New South Wales Press.
- Funnell, W. (2003). Enduring fundamentals: Constitutional accountability and auditors-general in the reluctant state. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14(1–2), 107–132.
10.1006/cpac.2002.0519 Google Scholar
- Funnell, W. (2007). The reason why: The English Constitution and the latent promise of liberty in the history of accounting. Accounting, Business & Financial History, 17(2), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585200701376618
10.1080/09585200701376618 Google Scholar
- Funnell, W., & Cooper, K. (1998). Public sector accounting and accountability in Australia. UNSW Press.
- Groom, E. (1990). The Curran Report and the role of the state. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 49(2), 144–154.
- Guthrie, J. (1998). Application of accrual accounting in the Australian public sector—Rhetoric or reality? Financial Accountability & Management, 14(1), 0267–4424.
- Greiner, N. (1990). Accountability in government organizations. In J. Guthrie, L. Parker, & D. Shand (Eds.), The public sector: Contemporary readings in accounting and auditing. HBJ.
- Harris, P. (2001). Machiavelli, political marketing and reinventing government. European Journal of Marketing, 35(9–10), 1136–1153.
10.1108/EUM0000000005962 Google Scholar
- Harris, P. (2007). Machiavelli, marketing and management: Ends and means in public affairs. Journal of Public Affairs, 7, 181–191.
10.1002/pa.254 Google Scholar
- Harris, P. (2010). Machiavelli and the global compass: Ends and means in ethics and leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 131–138.
- Hawker, G., Smith, R. F. I., & Weller, P. (1979). Politics and policy in Australia. University of Queensland Press.
- Henderson, S., Peirson, G., & Brown, R. (1992). Financial accounting theory: Its nature and development. Longman.
- Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
- Hood, C. (1995). The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 93–109.
- Hoskin, K. W., & Macve, R. H. (1986). Accounting and the examination: A genealogy of disciplinary power. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(2), 105–136.
- Irvine, H., & Deo, H. (2006). The power of the lens. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(2), 205–227.
10.1108/09513570610656097 Google Scholar
- Kirby, B. (2020). Machiavelli and liberalism. The Macksey Journal, 1(1), 1–11.
- Lee, T. (1995). The professionalization of Accountancy: A history of protecting the public interest in a self-interested way. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(4), 48–69.
10.1108/09513579510100725 Google Scholar
- Lapsley, I. (2008). The NPM Agenda: Back to the future. Financial Accountability and Management, 24(1), 77–96.
10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00444.x Google Scholar
- Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view. Palgrave Macmillan.
10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5 Google Scholar
- Lucy, R. (1985). The Australian form of government. Macmillan.
- Machiavelli, N. (1970). The Discourses, trans. L.J. Walker, ed. B. Crick, Penguin Books: Great Britain (Original work published 1518).
- Machiavelli, N. (1988). The Prince, eds. Q. Skinner & R. Price, Cambridge University Press: New York (Original work published 1513).
- Mautz, R. K. (1988). Monuments, mistakes and opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 2(3), 123–128.
- McCrae, M., & Aiken, M. (1988). Financial accountability of statutory authorities in Australia. Financial Accountability & Management, 4, 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.1988.tb00298.x
10.1111/j.1468-0408.1988.tb00068.x Google Scholar
- Public Accounts Committee. (1996). Assets Valuation in the PublicSector Seminar (Sydney, Australia).
- Micallef, F., & Peirson, G. (1997). Financial Reporting of Cultural Heritage, Scientific and Community Collections. Australian Accounting Review, 7(1), 31–37.
10.1111/j.1835-2561.1997.tb00025.x Google Scholar
- Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. Oxford University Press.
- Miller, M. C., & Islam, A. M. (1988). The definition and recognition of assets (accounting theory monograph 7). PSASB.
- Miller, P., & Power, M. (2013). Accounting, organizing, and economizing: Connecting accounting research and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 557–605.
- National Museum of Australia. (1990). Annual report 1989–90. National Museum of Australia.
- NSW Treasury. (1989). Accounting guidelines for reporting physical assets in the budget sector. NSW Treasury.
- NSW Treasury. (1995). Guidelines for the valuation of land and heritage assets in the NSW public sector. NSW Treasury.
- NSW Treasury. (2003). Valuation of physical non-current assets at fair value. NSW Treasury.
- O'Regan, P., & Killian, S. (2014). Professionals who understand’: Expertise, public interest and societal risk governance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(8), 615–631.
- Parker, L., & Gould, G. (1999). Changing public sector accountability: Critiquing new directions. Accounting Forum, 23, 109–135.
10.1111/1467-6303.00007 Google Scholar
- Pallot, J. (1990). The nature of public assets: A response to Mautz. Accounting Horizons, 4(2), 79–85.
- Pallot, J. (2001). Decade in review: New Zealand's experience with resource accounting and budgeting. Financial Accountability & Management, 17(4), 0267–4424.
- A. Parkin (2006). ‘ Understanding liberal-democratic politics’, In Government, Politics, Power and Policy in Australia (pp. 3–24), ed. A. Parkin, J. Summers & D. Woodward, Pearson, Australia.
- Paton, W. A. (1992). Accounting theory—With special reference to the corporate enterprise. Scholars Book Co.
- P. Pettit (Ed.). (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford University Press.
- Public Accounts Committee. (1986). Report on the Auditor-General's annual reports 1985/1986. Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory.
- Public Accounts Committee. (1988). Report of proceedings of the accrual accounting seminar 5 February 1988. Parliament of New South Wales.
- PSASB. (1996). AAS 27 financial reporting by local government. Australian Accounting Research Foundation.
- PSASB. (1998). AAS 29 financial reporting by government departments. Australian Accounting Research Foundation.
- RCAGA. (1976). Royal Commission on Australian Government administration report. A.G.P.S.
- Rowles, T. R. (1992). Financial reporting of infrastructure and heritage assets by public sector entities (discussion Paper No. 17). AARF.
- Ryan, C. (1998). The introduction of accrual reporting policy in the Australian public sector: An agenda setting explanation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 11(5), 518–539.
10.1108/09513579810239837 Google Scholar
- Shafer, W. E., & Simmons, R. S. (2008). Social responsibility, Machiavellianism and tax avoidance: A study of Hong Kong tax professionals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(5), 695–720.
10.1108/09513570810872978 Google Scholar
- Sellers, M. N. S. (1998). Machiavelli's conception of liberty. In The sacred fire of liberty (pp. 47–50). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371811_9
10.1057/9780230371811_9 Google Scholar
- Shome, A., & Rao, H. (2009). Machiavellianism in public accountants: Some additional Canadian evidence. Business Ethics, A European Review, 18(4), 364–371.
- Stacey, P. (2013). Free and unfree states in Machiavelli's political philosophy. In Q. Skinner & M. Gelderen (Eds.), Freedom and the construction of Europe: Religious freedom and civil liberty (Vol. 1, pp. 176–194). Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781139519281.013 Google Scholar
- Skinner, Q. (2003). A third concept of liberty. Proceedings of the British Academy, 117(2001), 237–268.
- Skinner, Q. (1983). Machiavelli on the maintenance of liberty, Politics, 18(2), 3–15.
- Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before liberalism. Cambridge University Press.
- Sutcliffe, P. (1985). Financial reporting in the public sector—A framework for analysis and identification of issues (accounting theory monograph 5). Australian Accounting Research Foundation.
- Tarcov, N. (2007). Freedom, republics, and peoples in Machiavelli's Prince. In R. Velkley (Ed.), Freedom and the human person (pp. 122–142). Catholic University of America Press.
- The Constitution. (2003). Commonwealth of Australia.
- Thompson, E. V. (1976). The report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Public Service of South Australia 1975. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 35(3), 273–280.
- Triki, A., Cook, G. L., & Bay, D. (2017). Machiavellianism, moral orientation, social desirability response bias, and anti-intellectualism: A profile of Canadian accountants. Journal of Business Ethics, 144, 623–635.
- Wakefield, R. L. (2008). Accounting and Machiavellianism. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20, 115–129.
10.2308/bria.2008.20.1.115 Google Scholar
- Walker, R. G. (1989). Should there be common standards for the public and private sector. In J. Guthrie, L. Parker, & D. Shard (Eds.), The public sector contemporary readings in accounting and auditing. HBJ.
- Wanna, J., Ryan, C., & Ng, C. (2001). From accounting to accountability: A centenary history of the Australian national audit office. Allen & Unwin.
- Wilenski, P. (1977). Review of NSW government administration: Directions for change. Government Printer.
- Wilenski, P. (1986). Public power and public administration. Hale & Iremonger.
- Zijl, T. V., & Whittington, G. (2006). Deprival value and fair value: A reinterpretation and a reconciliation. Accounting and Business Research, 32(2), 12–130.
