Volume 62, Issue 9 pp. e135-e139
BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Value of smartphone videos for diagnosis of seizures: Everyone owns half an epilepsy monitoring unit

Ushtar Amin

Corresponding Author

Ushtar Amin

Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology, University of South Florida and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA

Correspondence

Ushtar Amin, University of South Florida Health, 2 Tampa General Circle, Tampa, FL 33606, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher T. Primiani

Christopher T. Primiani

Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Stephanie MacIver

Stephanie MacIver

Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology, University of South Florida and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Angélica Rivera-Cruz

Angélica Rivera-Cruz

Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology, University of South Florida and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Alfred T. Frontera Jr.

Alfred T. Frontera Jr.

Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology, University of South Florida and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Selim R. Benbadis

Selim R. Benbadis

Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology, University of South Florida and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 July 2021
Citations: 19

Abstract

The diagnosis of epilepsy is primarily based on the history and the verbal description of the events in question. Smartphone videos are increasingly used to assist in the diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate their value for the diagnosis of seizures. We prospectively collected smartphone videos from patients who presented to our epilepsy center over two years. The video-based diagnosis was then compared to the eventual diagnosis based on video-electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring with recorded episodes. Video-EEG studies and smartphone videos were reviewed by two separate physicians, each blinded to the other's interpretation. Fifty-four patients were included in the final analysis (mean age = 34.7 years, SD = 17 years). Data (either smartphone video or video-EEG monitoring) were inconclusive in 18 patients. Of the 36 patients with conclusive data, 34 (94%) were in agreement. Smartphone video interpretation can be a useful adjunctive tool in the diagnosis of seizure-like events.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me