Volume 28, Issue 6 pp. 1859-1867
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Risk factors for the progression of motoric cognitive risk syndrome to dementia: Retrospective cohort analysis of two populations

Zeev Meiner

Zeev Meiner

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hadassah Mount Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel

Contribution: Data curation (equal), ​Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (supporting), Supervision (equal), Validation (equal), Writing - original draft (lead)

Search for more papers by this author
Emmeline Ayers

Emmeline Ayers

Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

Contribution: Conceptualization (supporting), Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (lead), ​Investigation (supporting), Methodology (equal), Project administration (lead), Resources (equal), Software (lead), Supervision (supporting), Writing - review & editing (supporting)

Search for more papers by this author
David A. Bennett

David A. Bennett

Department of Neurology, Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA

Contribution: Data curation (lead), Formal analysis (supporting), Funding acquisition (lead), Methodology (supporting), Project administration (lead), Resources (lead), Supervision (supporting), Validation (supporting), Visualization, Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
Cuiling Wang

Cuiling Wang

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

Contribution: Data curation (supporting), Formal analysis (lead), ​Investigation (supporting), Methodology (supporting), Software (equal), Supervision (supporting), Validation (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
Joe Verghese

Corresponding Author

Joe Verghese

Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

Correspondence

Joe Verghese, Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (supporting), Funding acquisition (supporting), ​Investigation (equal), Project administration (equal), Supervision (equal), Validation (equal), Visualization (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 March 2021
Citations: 10

Abstract

Background and purpose

Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is a predementia syndrome characterized by cognitive complaints and slow gait. MCR is associated with increased risk of cognitive decline and incident dementia. Predictors of transition to dementia in MCR patients are still obscure.

Methods

We examined clinical, biological and lifestyle parameters related to conversion to dementia using Cox models in 439 older adults with prevalent MCR (mean age 79.87 ± 8.13 years, 70% women) from two cohorts, 268 from the Chicago-based Rush Memory and Aging project (MAP) and 171 from the Religious Orders Study (ROS), which enrolled religious clergy across the United States.

Results

In the pooled sample, 439 (13.2%) had prevalent MCR (268 MAP and 171 ROS). There were 140 (31.9%) incident dementia cases over a median follow up of 4.0 years. Age predicted conversion from MCR to dementia in both cohorts. Male gender was a risk factor only in ROS. In the pooled data, only higher depressive symptoms were associated with higher risk of conversion to dementia (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.13, 95% CI 1.03–1.24). Lower cognitive activity participation (aHR 0.59, 95% CI 0.44–0.79) and apolipoprotein E ε4 allele (aHR 2.57, 95% CI 1.48–4.45) predicted conversion to dementia in MAP.

Conclusions

Depressive symptoms and other cohort-specific risk factors were identified as predictors of transition to dementia in individuals with MCR. These findings suggest common pathological mechanisms underlying mood, gait and cognitive declines in aging, which could help develop preventive strategies.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All data included in these analyses are available via the Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center Research Resource Sharing Hub, which can be found at https://www.radc.rush.edu. It has descriptions of the studies and variables and a dynamic query function to aid searches for data and biospecimens for selected data. There is a login, after which any qualified investigator can submit requests for deidentified data.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.