Volume 31, Issue 6 e13713
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Patient attitudes towards changes in colorectal cancer surveillance: An application of the Health Belief Model

Maddison Dix

Corresponding Author

Maddison Dix

Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Cancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Correspondence

Maddison Dix, Level 4 Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Carlene J. Wilson

Carlene J. Wilson

Cancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Austin Health, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia

Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ingrid H. Flight

Ingrid H. Flight

Cancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Molla M. Wassie

Molla M. Wassie

Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Cancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Graeme P. Young

Graeme P. Young

Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Cancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Charles Cock

Charles Cock

Cancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah Cohen-Woods

Sarah Cohen-Woods

Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Orama Institute for Mental Health and Well-Being, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Erin L. Symonds

Erin L. Symonds

Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Cancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Bowel Health Service, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 September 2022
Citations: 7

Sarah Cohen-Woods and Erin L. Symonds are equal senior authors.

Funding information: This work was supported by a Health Seeding Grant funded by the Flinders Foundation, Bedford Park, South Australia (grant number N/A).

Abstract

Objective

This is to determine whether health beliefs regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) screening could predict discomfort with a change to CRC surveillance proposing regular faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) instead of colonoscopy.

Methods

Eight hundred individuals enrolled in a South Australian colonoscopy surveillance programme were invited to complete a survey on surveillance preferences. Responses were analysed using binary logistic regression predicting discomfort with a hypothetical FIT-based surveillance change. Predictor variables included constructs based on the Health Belief Model: perceived threat of CRC, perceived confidence to complete FIT and colonoscopy (self-efficacy), perceived benefits from current surveillance and perceived barriers to FIT and colonoscopy.

Results

A total of 408 participants (51%) returned the survey (complete data n = 303; mean age 62 years, 52% male). Most participants (72%) were uncomfortable with FIT-based surveillance reducing colonoscopy frequency. This attitude was predicted by a higher perceived threat of CRC (OR = 1.03 [95% CI 1.01–1.04]), higher colonoscopy self-efficacy (OR = 1.34 [95% CI 1.13–1.59]) and lower perceived barriers to colonoscopy (OR = 0.92 [95% CI 0.86–0.99]).

Conclusions

Health beliefs regarding colonoscopy and perceived threat of CRC may be important to consider when changing CRC surveillance protocols. If guideline changes were introduced, these factors should be addressed to provide patients reassurance concerning the efficacy of the alternative protocol.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.