General practitioners' ‘lived experience’ of assessing psychological distress in cancer patients: an exploratory qualitative study
Corresponding Author
C.M. Carolan MB ChB, MRCP, MRCGP, MSc
Clinical Academic Fellow, GP Locum and GP Appraiser
School of Health Sciences, University of Stirling (Western Isles Campus), Stornoway, UK
NHS Western Isles, Stornoway, UK
Correspondence address: Clare M. Carolan, School of Health Sciences, University of Stirling (Western Isles Campus), Stornoway, UK (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorK. Campbell BSc (Hons), RGN, MN, PG Cert TLHE and BOE
Macmillan Senior Lecturer/Senior Teaching Fellow
School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
C.M. Carolan MB ChB, MRCP, MRCGP, MSc
Clinical Academic Fellow, GP Locum and GP Appraiser
School of Health Sciences, University of Stirling (Western Isles Campus), Stornoway, UK
NHS Western Isles, Stornoway, UK
Correspondence address: Clare M. Carolan, School of Health Sciences, University of Stirling (Western Isles Campus), Stornoway, UK (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorK. Campbell BSc (Hons), RGN, MN, PG Cert TLHE and BOE
Macmillan Senior Lecturer/Senior Teaching Fellow
School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
While psychological distress in cancer patients is common, little is known about how general practitioners (GPs) assess distress. Using semi-structured interviews, a phenomenological study of seven GPs was conducted to explore GPs' experiences of assessing distress. Findings revealed five themes: (1) Being in the Relay Team – receiving and passing the baton: where the assessment of distress was conceptualised as a relay baton passed between a team of health care professionals, with GPs most involved at diagnosis and in the palliative phase. (2) Being in a Relationship: where the doctor–patient relationship was described as a powerful facilitator to assessment. (3) Being Skilled: where GPs perceive they are skilled at assessment adopting a patient-centred approach. (4) Being Challenged – encountering barriers: challenges with assessment were identified regarding the GPs' own emotions, patient related factors and time; the duality of family as both barrier and facilitator was voiced. (5) The Intruder in the Room: where GPs did not use validated screening tools which were viewed as an intruder in the doctor–patient relationship. Further research to objectively assess GPs' skills in distress assessment and attitudes towards the use of screening tools within the cancer care context are merited.
References
- Absolom K., Holch P., Pini S., Hill K., Liu A., Sharpe M., Richardson A. & Velikova G.; on behalf of the NCRI COMPASS Supportive and Palliative Care Research Collaborative (2011) The detection and management of emotional distress in cancer patients: the views of health care professionals. Psycho-Oncology 20, 601–608.
- Berger P. & Luckman T. (1967) The Social Construction of Reality. Allen Lane, London, UK.
- Bidstrup P.E., Johansen C. & Mitchell A.J. (2011) Screening for cancer-related distress: summary of evidence from tools to programmes. Acta Oncologica 50, 194–204.
- Browne S., Dowie A., Mitchell E., Wyke S., Ziebland S., Campbell N. & Macleod U. (2011) Patients' needs following colorectal cancer diagnosis: where does primary care fit in? The British Journal of General Practice 61, 692–699.
- Bultz B.D. & Carlson L.E. (2005) Emotional distress: the sixth vital sign in cancer care. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23, 6440–6441.
- Chew-Graham C.A., May C.R. & Perry M.S. (2002) Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals. Family Practice 19, 285–289.
- Coar L. & Sim J. (2006) Interviewing one's peers: methodological issues in a study of health professionals. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 24, 251–256.
- Denscombe M. (2010) The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects, 4th edn. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK.
- Dowling M. (2007) From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches. Interna-tional Journal of Nursing Studies 44, 131–142.
- Dowrick C., Leydon G., McBride A., Howe A., Burgess H., Clarke P., Maisey S. & Kendrick T. (2009) ‘Patients’ and doctors' views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: qualitative study. British Medical Journal 338, 1–9.
- Earle V. (2010) Phenomenology as research method or substantive metaphysics? An overview of phenomenology's uses in nursing. Nursing Philosophy 11, 286–296.
- Fallowfield L., Ratcliffe D., Jenkins V. & Saul J. (2001) Psychiatric morbidity and its recognition by doctors in patients with cancer. British Journal of Cancer 84, 1011–1015.
- Farber S.J., Egnew T.R., Herman- Bertsh J.L., Taylor T.R. & Guildin G.E. (2003) Issues in end-of-life care: patient, caregiver and clinician perceptions. Journal of Palliative Medicine 6, 19–31.
- Finlay L. (2002) “Outing'' the researcher: the provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research 4, 531–545.
- Gao W., Bennett M.I., Stark D., Murray S. & Higginson I.J. (2010) Psychological distress in cancer from survivorship to end of life care: prevalence, associated factors and clinical implications. European Journal of Cancer 46, 2036–2044.
- Heidegger M. (1962) Being and Time. Translated by. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. Harper & Row, New York, NY, USA.
- Hjortdhal P. (1992) The influence of general practitioners' knowledge about their patients on the clinical decision making process. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 10, 290–294.
- Hodges L., Butcher I., Kleiboer A., McHugh G., Murray G., Walker J., Wilson R. & Sharpe M. (2009) Patient and general practitioner preferences for the treatment of depression in patients with cancer: how, who, and where? Journal of Psychosomatic Research 67, 399–402.
- Husserl E. (1970) Logical Investigations, Volume 2 translated by J. N. Findlay. Routledge and Keagan Paul, London, UK.
- Kelly B., Varghese F., Burnett P., Turner J., Robertson M., Kelly P., Mitchell G. & Treston P. (2008) General practitioner's experiences of the psychological aspects in the care of a dying patient. Palliative and Supportive Care 6, 125–131.
- Kendall M., Mason B., Momen N., Barclay S., Munday D., Lovick R., MacPherson S., Paterson E., Baughan P., Cormie P., Kiehlmann P., Free A. & Murray S. (2013) Proactive cancer care in primary care: a mixed-methods study. Family Practice 30, 302–312.
- Maguire P. (1985) Barriers to psychological care of the dying. British Medical Journal 291, 1711–1713.
- Maguire P., Faulkner A., Booth K., Elliot C. & Hiller V. (1996) Helping cancer patients disclose their concerns. European Journal of Cancer 32, 78–81.
- van Manen M. (1990) Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Althouse Press, London, UK.
- McConnell D., Butow P. & Tattersall M.H.N. (1999) Improving the letters we write: an exploration of doctor-doctor communication in cancer care. British Journal of Cancer 80, 427–437.
- McWilliam C.L., Belle Brown J. & Stewart M. (2000) Breast cancer patients' experience of patient-doctor communication: a working relationship. Patient Education and Counselling 39, 191–204.
- Mitchell A.J., Kaar S., Coggan C. & Herdman J. (2008) Acceptability of common screening methods used to detect distress and mood disorders-preferences of cancer specialists and non-specialists. Psycho-Oncology 17, 226–236.
- Mitchell C., Dwyer R., Hagan T. & Mathers N. (2011a) Impact of the QOF and the NICE guideline in the diagnosis and management of depression. British Journal of General Practice 61, 279–289.
- Mitchell A.J., Sanjay Rao S. & Vaze A. (2011b) Can general practitioners identify people with distress and mild depression? A meta-analysis of clinical accuracy Journal of Affective Disorders 130, 26–36.
- Murray S.A., Kendall M., Boyd K., Worth A. & Benton T.F. (2003) General practitioners and their possible role in providing spiritual care: a qualitative study. The British Journal of General Practice 53, 957–959.
- Murray S.A., Kendall M., Boyd K., Worth A. & Benton T.F. (2004) Exploring the spiritual needs of people dying of lung cancer or heart failure: a prospective qualitative interview study of patients and their carers. Palliative Medicine 18, 39–45.
- Murray S.A., Kendall E.G., Grant E., Boyd K., Barclay S. & Sheikh A. (2007) Patterns of social, psychological, and spiritual decline toward the end of life in lung cancer and heart failure. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 34, 393–402.
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2010) NCNN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Distress Man-agement V.1.2010. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/distress.pdf (accessed 29 April 2010) *requires registration login.
- NHS Western Isles. Available at: http://www.wihb.scot.nhs.uk/index.asp (accessed 1 August 2011).
- Norlyk A. & Harder I. (2010) What makes a phenomenological study phenom-enological? An analysis of peer- reviewed empirical nursing studies. Qualitative Health Research 20, 420–443.
- Norman A., Sisler J., Hack T. & Harlos M. (2001) Family physicians and cancer care. Palliative care patients' perspectives. Canadian Family Physician 47, 2009–2012.
- Pascoe S.W., Neal R.D., Allgar V.L., Selby P.J. & Wright E.P. (2004) Psychosocial care for cancer patients in primary care? Recognition of opportunities for cancer care. Family Practice 21, 437–442.
- Patton M.Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, USA.
- Ridd M., Lewis G., Peters T. & Salisbury C. (2012) Detection of patient psychological distress and longitudinal patient-doctor relationships: a cross-sectional study. The British Journal of General Practice 62, e167–e173.
- Sandelowski M. (1995) Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing Health 18, 179–183.
- Schofield P., Carey M., Bonevski B. & Sanson Fisher R. (2006) Barriers to the provision of evidence-based psychosocial care in oncology. Psycho-Oncology 15, 863–872.
- Sisler J.J. (2003) Delays in diagnosing cancer. Threat to the patient-physician relationship. Canadian Family Physician 49, 857–859.
- Slort W., Schweitzer B., Blankenstein A., Abarshi E., Riphagen I., Echteld M. & Deliens L. (2011) Perceived barriers and facilitators for general practitioner-patient communication in palliative care: a systematic review. Palliative Medicine 25, 613–629.
- Smith J.A., Flowers P. & Larkin M. (2009) Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Theory, Method and Research. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, UK.
- Starks H. & Brown Trinidad S. (2007) Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research 17, 1372–1380.
- Sussman J. & Baldwin L. (2010) The interface of primary and oncology speciality care: from diagnosis through primary treatment. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs 40, 18–24.
10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq007 Google Scholar
- Taylor K. (2009) Paternalism, participation and partnership—the evolution of patient centeredness in the consultation. Patient Education and Counselling 74, 150–155.
- Thome B., Esbensen B.A., Dykes A.K. & Hallberg I.R. (2004) The meaning of having to live with cancer in old age. European Journal of Cancer Care 13, 399–408.
- Warmenhoven F., van Rijswijk E., van Hoogstraten E., van Spaendonck K., Lucassen P., Prins J., Vissers K. & van Weel C. (2012) How family physicians address diagnosis and management of depression in palliative care patients. Annals Family Medicine 10, 330–336.
- Watson E.K., Sugden E.M. & Rose P.W. (2010) Views of primary care physicians and oncologists on cancer follow-up initiatives in primary care: an online survey. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 4, 159–166.