Volume 25, Issue 3 pp. 381-390
Original Article

Understanding receptivity to informal supportive cancer care in regional and rural Australia: a Heideggerian analysis

J. Pascal PhD

Corresponding Author

J. Pascal PhD

Senior Lecturer

Department of Public and Community Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Vic., 3550 Australia

Correspondence address: Jan Pascal, Department of Public and Community Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Edwards Rd, Bendigo, Vic. 3550, Australia (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
N. Johnson PhD

N. Johnson PhD

Lecturer

Department of Public and Community Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Vic., 3550 Australia

Search for more papers by this author
V. Dickson-Swift PhD

V. Dickson-Swift PhD

Senior Lecturer

Department of Public and Community Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Vic., 3550 Australia

Search for more papers by this author
P. McGrath PhD

P. McGrath PhD

Associate Professor and Senior Research Fellow

Centre for Community Science, Population & Social Health Program, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Qld, 4131 Australia

Search for more papers by this author
F. Dangerfield MHSc

F. Dangerfield MHSc

Associate Lecturer

Department of Public and Community Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Vic., 3550 Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 June 2015
Citations: 9

Abstract

The concept of receptivity is a new way of understanding the personal and social factors that affect a person living with and beyond cancer, and how these factors influence access to formal supportive care service provision and planning. This article contributes to new knowledge through applying the concept of receptivity to informal supportive cancer care in regional Australia. Literature indicates that a cancer diagnosis is a life-changing experience, particularly in regional communities, where survival rates are lower and there are significant barriers to accessing services. Heideggerian phenomenology informed the design of the study and allowed for a rich and nuanced understanding of participants lived experiences of informal supportive cancer care. These experiences were captured using in-depth interviews, which were subsequently thematically analysed. Nineteen participants were recruited from across regional Victoria, Australia. Participants self-reported a range of stages and types of cancer. Significantly, findings revealed that most participants were not referred to, and did not seek, formal supportive care. Instead, they were receptive to informal supportive care. Understanding receptivity and the role of anxiety and fear of death has implications for partners, family, community members, as well as professionals working with people with living with and beyond cancer.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.