Volume 22, Issue 3 pp. 326-333
Original article

Refractory cachexia and truth-telling about terminal prognosis: a qualitative study

C. Millar PhD, RN

C. Millar PhD, RN

Clinical Research Nurse

Northern Ireland Biobank, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast

Search for more papers by this author
J. Reid PhD, RN

J. Reid PhD, RN

Lecturer in Cancer Nursing

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK

Search for more papers by this author
S. Porter PhD, RN

Corresponding Author

S. Porter PhD, RN

Professor of Nursing Research

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK

Correspondence address: Sam Porter, Professor of Nursing Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, University Road, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 December 2012
Citations: 17

Refractory cachexia and truth-telling about terminal prognosisa qualitative study

The purpose of this paper is to examine the consequences that medical practitioners' decisions about whether or not to be candid about terminal prognosis have for those suffering from refractory cachexia and their families. It presents the findings of a qualitative study that used focus groups and semi-structured interviews of a volunteer sample of doctors, nurses and dieticians in a cancer centre of a large teaching hospital in Northern Ireland. Respondents reported that some physicians tended to avoid discussing terminal prognosis in a direct manner with their patients. Nurses and dieticians tended to be reluctant to engage in conversations about weight loss with patients with cachexia. One of the reasons they reported for their lack of acknowledgement of weight loss concerned the close association between refractory cachexia and terminal prognosis. Because they viewed the telling of bad news as an exclusive prerogative of medical practitioners, they did not feel in a position to discuss cachexia because they were concerned that this had the potential to raise end-of-life issues that lay outside the boundaries of their professional role. This meant patients and their families were provided with little information about how to cope with the distressing consequences of cachexia.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.