Designing Systems in a Fine-Grained and Inclusive Way, by Integrating Service Design within Futures Studies and Foresight
Abstract
This paper evaluates the human-centric, systemic and near future-driven components of Service Design to understand how they can work within a Future Studies and Foresight (FSF) framework. Expanding on empirical evidence gathered from a case study with renters and shareowners in Danish cooperative housing associations (Andelsboligforeningen), the paper looks at how the application of Service Design – within Future Studies and Foresight (FSF, hereafter) – can facilitate a fine-grained and inclusive rebuilding of our socio-technical systems in a way that allows end-users to understand and engage with them more productively. The paper provides a theoretical reflection on the gestalt emerging from bridging Service Design and FSF and how this can inspire and establish strategic viewpoints on how to co-design complex systems embedded in different socio-technical dimensions.
References
- Bjögvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P.-A. (2012). Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges. Design Issues, 28(3), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00165
- Bourgeois, R., Penunia, E., Bisht, S., & Boruk, D. (2017). Foresight for all: Co-elaborative scenario building and empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124, 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.018
- Bratton, B. H. (2015). The stack: On software and sovereignty. MIT Press.
- Brown, T. (2008, June 1). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinking
- Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation ( 1st ed). Harper Business.
- Buchanan, R. (2019). Systems Thinking and Design Thinking: The Search for Principles in the World We Are Making. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(2), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.001
10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.001 Google Scholar
- Bühring, J. H., & Liedtka, J. (2018). Embracing systematic future thinking at the intersection of Strategic Planning, Foresight and Design. Journal of Innovation Management, 6(3), 134. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_006.003_0006
10.24840/2183-0606_006-003_0006 Google Scholar
- Butera, F. (2005). Il castello e la rete: Impresa, organizzazioni e professioni nell'Europa degli anni ‘90. Franco Angeli.
- Conway, M. (2021). Foresight Futures [PhD thesis]. https://foresightfutures.net/the-history-of-foresight
- Dyrman, M. H., Bjerregaard, W., Arroyo, N., Toldam, R., Liukkonen, M., Pavuk, A., & Mortensen, A. K. (2018). Book of futures—A Bespoke guide (3rd Edition). Papirøen. https://bespokecph.com/methodology/
- Dark Matter Labs. (2022). DM Note # 7: Visualising and Communicating Complexity. Medium. https://provocations.darkmatterlabs.org/dm-note-7-visualising-and-communicating-complexity-be461086fb29
- Ehn, P., Nilsson, E., & Topgaard, R. (2014). Making futures: Marginal notes on innovation, design, and democracy. The MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/9874.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University press.
10.1215/9780822371816 Google Scholar
- Friedman, K., & Muratovski, G. (2022). Research for Designers (2nd Ed.). Research for Designers: A Guide to Methods and Practice (2nd Edition). https://www.academia.edu/72480493/Research_for_Designers_2nd_Ed_Prelims
- Gordon, A., Rohrbeck, R., & Schwarz, J. (2019). Escaping the ‘Faster Horses’ Trap: Bridging Strategic Foresight and Design-Based Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(8). https://timreview.ca/article/1259
- Hill, D. (2012). Dark matter and trojan horses: A strategic design vocabulary ( First edition). Strelka Press.
- Hines, A., & Zindato, D. (2016). Designing Foresight and Foresighting Design: Opportunities for Learning and Collaboration via Scenarios. World Futures Review, 8(4), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756716672477
10.1177/1946756716672477 Google Scholar
- Jon, I. (2020). A manifesto for planning after the coronavirus: Towards planning of care. Planning Theory, 19(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095220931272
- Jones, P. (2014). Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54478-4_4
10.1007/978-4-431-54478-4_4 Google Scholar
- Kulsbjerg Løgager, C., Simeone, L., & Mejía, M. (2021). A foresight-oriented service design approach to foster longer-term thinking and sustainable practices. European Academy of Design Conference.
- Lang, R. (2015). Bringing real localism into practice through co-operative housing governance: The role and prospects for community-led housing in England. https://www.academia.edu/13990318/Bringing_real_localism_into_practice_through_co_operative_housing_governance_The_role_and_prospects_for_community_led_housing_in_England
- Larsen, H. G. (2019). Three phases of Danish cohousing: Tenure and the development of an alternative housing form. Housing Studies, 34(8), 1349–1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1569599
- Lenzholzer, S., & Brown, R. D. (2016). Post-positivist microclimatic urban design research: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 153, 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.008
- Manzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/9873.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Maschi, S. (2002). Scenarios within Design Processes: A Theoretical Framework to Support the Production of Visually-Based Cognitive Models of Systems of Products, Services, and Stakeholders." [PhD thesis]. Politecnico di Milano.
- Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. The Academy for Systems Change. https://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/
- Miller, R. (2015). Learning, the Future, and Complexity. An Essay on the Emergence of Futures Literacy. European Journal of Education, 50(4), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12157
- Morelli, N. (2002). Designing Product/Service Systems: A Methodological Exploration. Design Issues, 18, 15.
- Morelli, N., de Götzen, A., & Simeone, L. (2021). Service Design Capabilities (Vol. 10). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56282-3
10.1007/978-3-030-56282-3 Google Scholar
- Nikolova, B. (2013). The rise and promise of participatory foresight. European Journal of Futures Research, 2(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-013-0033-2
- Ogilvy, J. A. (2002). Creating better futures: Scenario planning as a tool for a better tomorrow. Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oso/9780195146110.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Penin, L. (2018). An introduction to service design. Design the Invisible. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Pereno, A., & Barbero, S. (2020). Systemic design for territorial enhancement: An overview on design tools supporting socio-technical system innovation. Strategic Design Research Journal, 13, 113–136. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2020.132.02
10.4013/sdrj.2020.132.02 Google Scholar
- Polaine, A., Løvlie, L., & Reason, B. (2013). Service design: From insight to implementation. Rosenfeld Media.
- Robertson, T., & Simonsen, J. (2012). Challenges and Opportunities in Contemporary Participatory Design. Design Issues, 28(3), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00157
- Schultz, W. L. (2015). A Brief History of Futures. World Futures Review, 7(4), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756715627646
10.1177/1946756715627646 Google Scholar
- J. Simonsen, & T. Robertson (Eds.). (2013). Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge.
- Smith, S., & Ashby, M. (2020). How to future: Leading and sense-making in an age of hyperchange. Kogan Page Inspire.
- M. Stickdorn, M. Hormess, A. Lawrence, & J. Schneider (Eds.). (2018). This is service design doing: Applying service design thinking in the real world; a practitioners' handbook ( First edition). O'Reilly.
- Vestergaard, H. (2007). A short history of housing and housing policy in Denmark since 1945. Housing in Denmark, 10–19.
- Vickers, G. (1983). The Poverty of Problem Solving. In M. Batty & B. Hutchinson (Eds.), Systems Analysis in Urban Policy-Making and Planning (pp. 17–28). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3560-3_3
10.1007/978-1-4613-3560-3_3 Google Scholar
- Waverley Consultants. (2017). Futures toolkit for policy-makers and analysts. Government Office for Science (UK). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/futures-toolkit-for-policy-makers-and-analysts
- Wilkinson, A., Mayer, M., & Ringler, V. (2014). Collaborative Futures: Integrating Foresight with Design in Large Scale Innovation Processes-Seeing and Seeding the Futures of Europe. Journal of Futures Studies, 18, 1–26.
- Williams, J. (2005). Designing Neighbourhoods for Social Interaction: The Case of Cohousing. Williams, J. (2005) Designing Neighbourhoods for Social Interaction: The Case of Cohousing. Journal of Urban Design, 10 (2). Pp. 195-227. ISSN 13574809, 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800500086998
10.1080/13574800500086998 Google Scholar
- Yang, G. (2016). Narrative Agency in Hashtag Activism: The Case of #BlackLivesMatter. Media and Communication, 4(4), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.692
- Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th edition). Sage.