Volume 26, Issue S11 pp. 123-138
Report

Long-term outcomes of soft tissue augmentation around dental implants on soft and hard tissue stability: a systematic review

Roberto Rotundo

Corresponding Author

Roberto Rotundo

Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy

Periodontal Unit, Eastman Dental Institute, University College of London, London, UK

Corresponding author:

Roberto Rotundo

Via Vasco de’ Gama 33/3

50127 Firenze, Italy

Tel.: +390550982016

e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Umberto Pagliaro

Umberto Pagliaro

Private Practice, Florence, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Elena Bendinelli

Elena Bendinelli

Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Marco Esposito

Marco Esposito

Department of Biomaterials, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Jacopo Buti

Jacopo Buti

School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 September 2015
Citations: 36

Abstract

Aim

To investigate whether the height and volume of the soft tissues and peri-implant bone levels around dental implants are stable, when soft tissue augmentation has been performed.

Materials and Methods

Three operators conducted a search on electronic databases (MEDLINE, COCHRANE, EMBASE) and a hand searching on the main journals dealing with periodontology and implantology until 30 October 2014. Only articles that considered peri-implant soft tissue augmentation performed in a group of at least 10 patients and with a follow-up of at least 1 year were selected. The outcome variables were peri-implant attached/keratinized tissue width (KTW) changes, peri-implant marginal soft tissue level (PSL) changes, and peri-implant marginal bone level (PBL) changes. The review was performed according to the PRISMA statements.

Results

Ten articles were selected for the qualitative synthesis, but only one meta-analysis was accomplished, indicating that 1 year after implant recession coverage procedures, a mean gain of 1.65 ± 0.01 mm (90% CrI [1.44; 1.85]) was observed.

Conclusions

There is no long-term evidence whether augmented soft tissues can be maintained over time and able to influence the peri-implant bone levels.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.