Volume 26, Issue 9 pp. 1015-1023
Original Article

Implant decontamination with 2% chlorhexidine during surgical peri-implantitis treatment: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

Y. C. M. de Waal

Corresponding Author

Y. C. M. de Waal

Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Corresponding author:

Yvonne de Waal

Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene

University of Groningen

University Medical Center Groningen

Antonius Deusinglaan 1

9713 AV Groningen

The Netherlands

Tel.: +31 50 3639051

Fax: +31 50 3632696

e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
G. M. Raghoebar

G. M. Raghoebar

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
H. J. A. Meijer

H. J. A. Meijer

Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
E. G. Winkel

E. G. Winkel

Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
A. J. van Winkelhoff

A. J. van Winkelhoff

Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Department of Medical and Oral Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 May 2014
Citations: 65

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and microbiological effects of implant surface decontamination with a 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) solution in comparison with a 0.12% chlorhexidine + 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) solution during resective surgical peri-implantitis treatment.

Material and methods

Forty-four patients (108 implants) with peri-implantitis were treated with resective surgical treatment consisting of bone re-contouring, surface debridement and chemical decontamination, and apically repositioned flap. Patients were randomly allocated to decontamination with a 2% CHX solution (test group) or 0.12% CHX + 0.05% CPC (control group). Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded before treatment (baseline), and at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Microbiological parameters were recorded during surgery.

Results

Multilevel analysis showed no significant differences in bleeding, suppuration, probing pocket depth, and radiographic bone loss between control and test group over three follow-up measurements (3, 6, and 12 months) from baseline. Both decontamination procedures resulted in significant reductions in anaerobic bacterial counts on the implant surface, but no significant difference was noted between control and test group (mean log 3.37 ± 2.34 vs. 3.65 ± 2.87, = 0.99).

Conclusions

The use of a 2% CHX solution for implant surface decontamination during resective peri-implantitis therapy does not lead to improved clinical, radiographic, or microbiological results compared with a 0.12% CHX + 0.05% CPC solution. Overall, the additional use of CHX reduces anaerobic bacterial load on the implant surface better than mechanical debridement alone, but does not seem to enhance clinical treatment outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01852253).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.