Volume 26, Issue 9 pp. 1024-1030
Original Article

Technical and biological complications of single-molar implant restorations

Sven Rinke

Corresponding Author

Sven Rinke

Private Practice Hanau, Germany

Corresponding author:

Priv.-Doz. Dr. Sven Rinke, MSc, MSc

Private Practice

Geleitstr. 68

63456 Hanau

Germany

Tel.: +49 6181 189 0950

Fax: +49 6181 189 0959

e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Matthias Roediger

Matthias Roediger

Department of Prosthodontics, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Eickholz

Peter Eickholz

Department of Periodontology, Center for Dental Medicine, Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Katharina Lange

Katharina Lange

Department of Medical Statistics, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Dirk Ziebolz

Dirk Ziebolz

Department of Operative Dentistry, Preventive Dentistry and Periodontology, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 March 2014
Citations: 20

Abstract

Objectives

Retrospective evaluation of the biological and technical complications in implant-supported single-tooth molar restorations performed in a private practice after functional periods of ≥4 years.

Material and Methods

Sixty-five patients (34 females, age 51.7 ± 10.6 years) with 112 implants received annual follow-up examinations and participated in a maintenance program. The survival (in situ) and success (complication-free) rates of implants and superstructures were evaluated. Time-dependent peri-implantitis rates were calculated, and the influencing factors were identified using a multiple Cox regression.

Results

The implant survival rate was 100%. Three of 112 crowns required replacement (prosthetic survival rate = 98.1%). Thirty technical complications were observed: loss of retention (16), ceramic fracture (10), and screw loosening (4). The success rate of the superstructures was 79.0% after 7 years. Overall, 9.2% of the patients developed peri-implantitis (probing depth ≥5 mm, BOP, suppuration, bone loss ≥3.5 mm); (smokers: 41.6%, non-smokers: 1.8%). After 7 years, the time-dependent implant success rate (free of peri-implantitis) was 100% for non-smokers and 58.6% for smokers. Multiple analysis showed a significant effect of smoking (hazard ratio, 19.5; P = 0.008) on peri-implantitis.

Conclusions

Implants with cemented single-tooth restorations in the molar region constitute a reliable treatment in private practice. Smokers have a significantly increased peri-implantitis rate.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.