Evaluation of Guided Bone Regeneration around Oral Implants over Different Healing Times Using Two Different Bovine Bone Materials: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical and Histological Investigation
Ralf Joachim Kohal DDS, Dr med dent habil, PhD
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorLisa Marie Straub DDS, Dr med dent
Chung-U Nam Dental Practice, Berlin, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorMartin Wolkewitz PhD, Dr Sc hum
Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorMaria Bächle Dr Dipl Biol
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sebastian Berthold Maximilian Patzelt DMD, Dr med dent
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
Corresponding Author: Dr. Sebastian B. M. Patzelt, University Medical Center, School of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorRalf Joachim Kohal DDS, Dr med dent habil, PhD
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorLisa Marie Straub DDS, Dr med dent
Chung-U Nam Dental Practice, Berlin, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorMartin Wolkewitz PhD, Dr Sc hum
Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorMaria Bächle Dr Dipl Biol
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sebastian Berthold Maximilian Patzelt DMD, Dr med dent
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
Corresponding Author: Dr. Sebastian B. M. Patzelt, University Medical Center, School of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Purpose
To evaluate the potential of two bone substitute materials and the influence of different healing periods in guided bone regeneration therapy of osseous defects around implants.
Materials and Methods
Twenty-four edentulous patients received implants in the region of the lost lower incisors. Around two standardized osseous defects were created, treated either with a 50:50 mixture of PepGen P-15® and OsteoGraf®/N-700 (test group) or with BioOss® (control group), and covered with titanium membranes. After healing periods of 2, 4, 6, or 9 months, the implants were removed together with the surrounding bone and subsequently prepared for histological evaluations.
Results
Defect depths in both groups showed a clinical reduction after intervention. The histologically measured distance from the implant shoulder to the first point of bone-implant contact (BIC) after treatment did not differ between the two groups. The healing time influenced the level of the first point of BIC, with a longer healing period producing a more coronal first point of BIC. A greater percentage BIC and a higher fraction of mineralized bone were found in the pristine bone area compared with the augmented defect area.
Conclusion
It can be concluded that in the treatment of osseous defects around oral implants, both materials were equally effective bone substitute materials when used in combination with guided bone regeneration.
References
- 1 Misch CE, Misch-Dietsh F, Silc J, Barboza E, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Posterior implant single-tooth replacement and status of adjacent teeth during a 10-year period: a retrospective report. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 2378–2382.
- 2 Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Biologic outcome of single-implant restorations as tooth replacements: a long-term follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2: 209–218.
- 3 Koo KT, Wikesjö UM, Park JY, et al. Evaluation of single-tooth implants in the second molar region: a 5-year life-table analysis of a retrospective study. J Periodontol 2010; 81: 1242–1249.
- 4 Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, et al. Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 639–645.
- 5 Leonhardt A, Gröndahl K, Bergström C, Lekholm U. Long-term follow-up of osseointegrated titanium implants using clinical, radiographic and microbiological parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 127–132.
- 6 Becktor JP, Isaksson S, Sennerby L. Survival analysis of endosseous implants in grafted and nongrafted edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 107–115.
- 7 Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 161–172.
- 8 Weber HP, Crohin CC, Fiorellini JP. A 5-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 144–153.
- 9 Rentsch-Kollar A, Huber S, Mericske-Stern R. Mandibular implant overdentures followed for over 10 years: patient compliance and prosthetic maintenance. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23: 91–98.
- 10 Vercruyssen M, Marcelis K, Coucke W, Naert I, Quirynen M. Long-term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient-centred outcome) of the two-implants-supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 357–365.
- 11 Einführung in die dentale Implantologie. In: JR Strub, M Kern, JC Türp, S Witkowski, G Heydecke, S Wolfart, eds. Curriculum Prothetik. 4th ed. Berlin: Quintessenz, 2011: 923–972.
- 12 Neukam FW, Hausamen JE, Scheller H. Moglichkeiten und Grenzen der Implantologie beim Alteren Patienten. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1989; 44: 490–492.
- 13 Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Methods to treat the edentulous posterior maxilla: implants with sinus grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 867–871.
- 14 Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 212–218.
- 15 Dahlin C. Scientific background of guided bone regeneration. In: D Buser, C Dahlin, R Schenk, eds. Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing, 1994: 31–48.
- 16 Fontana F, Santoro F, Maiorana C, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Simion M. Clinical and histologic evaluation of allogeneic bone matrix versus autogenous bone chips associated with titanium-reinforced e-PTFE membrane for vertical ridge augmentation: a prospective pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 1003–1012.
- 17 Geurs NC, Korostoff JM, Vassilopoulos PJ, et al. Clinical and histologic assessment of lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using a synthetic long-term bioabsorbable membrane and an allograft. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 1133–1140.
- 18 Stavropoulos A, Karring T. Five-year results of guided tissue regeneration in combination with deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss) in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects: a case series report. Clin Oral Investig 2005; 9: 271–277.
- 19 Aimetti M, Pigella E, Romano F. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the effects of guided tissue regeneration using resorbable membranes after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007; 27: 51–59.
- 20 Buser D, Dula K, Belser UC, Hirt HP, Berthold H. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. II. Surgical procedure in the mandible. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995; 15: 10–29.
- 21 Buser D, Dula K, Hess D, Hirt HP, Belser UC. Localized ridge augmentation with autografts and barrier membranes. Periodontol 2000 1999; 19: 151–163.
- 22 Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, Lussi A, Hirt HP, Belser UC. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002; 22: 109–117.
- 23 Dahlin C, Johansson A. Iliac crest autogenous bone graft versus alloplastic graft and guided bone regeneration in the reconstruction of atrophic maxillae: a 5-year retrospective study on cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 13: 305–310.
- 24 Dahlin C, Lekholm U, Becker W, et al. Treatment of fenestration and dehiscence bone defects around oral implants using the guided tissue regeneration technique: a prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 312–318.
- 25 Linde A, Alberius P, Dahlin C, Bjurstam K, Sundin Y. Osteopromotion: a soft-tissue exclusion principle using a membrane for bone healing and bone neogenesis. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 1116–1128.
- 26 Kohal RJ, Wirsching C, Bächle M. Geführte Knochenregeneration um dentale Implantate mit einer bioresorbierbaren Membran. Eine tierexperimentelle Pilot-Untersuchung. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2001; 111: 1397–1405.
- 27 Pappalardo S, Puzzo S, Carlino V, Cappello V. Bone substitutes in oral surgery. Minerva Stomatol 2007; 56: 541–557.
- 28 Gerressen M, Hermanns-Sachweh B, Riediger D, Hilgers RD, Spiekermann H, Ghassemi A. Purely cancellous versus corticocancellous bone in sinus floor augmentation with autogenous iliac crest: a prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 109–115.
- 29 Porrini R, Rocchetti V, Vercellino V, Cannas M, Sabbatini M. Alveolar bone regeneration in post-extraction socket: a review of materials to postpone dental implant. Biomed Mater Eng 2011; 21: 63–74.
- 30 McAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 377–396.
- 31 Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V. Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy). J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 173–202.
- 32 Lioubavina-Hack N, Carmagnola D, Lynch SE, Karring T. Effect of Bio-Oss with or without platelet-derived growth factor on bone formation by “guided tissue regeneration”: a pilot study in rats. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 1254–1260.
- 33 Schwarz F, Sager M, Ferrari D, Mihatovic I, Becker J. Influence of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor on lateral ridge augmentation using biphasic calcium phosphate and guided bone regeneration: a histomorphometric study in dogs. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 1315–1323.
- 34 Al-Hazmi BA, Al-Hamdan KS, Al-Rasheed A, Babay N, Wang HL, Al-Hezaimi K. Efficacy of using PDGF and xenograft with or without collagen membrane for bone regeneration around immediate implants with induced dehiscence-type defects: a microcomputed tomographic study in dogs. J Periodontol 2013; 84: 371–378.
- 35 Thorwarth M, Schultze-Mosgau S, Wehrhan F, et al. Bioactivation of an anorganic bone matrix by P-15 peptide for the promotion of early bone formation. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 5648–5657.
- 36 Krauser JT, Rohrer MD, Wallace SS. Human histologic and histomorphometric analysis comparing OsteoGraf/N with PepGen P-15 in the maxillary sinus elevation procedure: a case report. Implant Dent 2000; 9: 298–302.
- 37 Valentin AH, Weber J. Receptor technology – cell binding to P-15: a new method of regenerating bone quickly and safely – preliminary histomorphometrical and mechanical results in sinus floor augmentations. Keio J Med 2004; 53: 166–171.
- 38 Bhatnagar RS, Qian JJ, Wedrychowska A, Sadeghi M, Wu YM, Smith N. Design of biomimetic habitats for tissue engineering with P-15, a synthetic peptide analogue of collagen. Tissue Eng 1999; 5: 53–65.
- 39 Nguyen H, Qian JJ, Bhatnagar RS, Li S. Enhanced cell attachment and osteoblastic activity by P-15 peptide-coated matrix in hydrogels. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003; 311: 179–186.
- 40 Turhani D. Osteocalcinexpression in “Tissue Engineering” hergestellten Biokomposits. Z Zahnärztl Implantol 2003; 19: 153–158.
- 41
Yukna RA, Callan DP, Krauser JT, et al. Multi-center clinical evaluation of combination anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix (ABM)/cell binding peptide (P-15) as a bone replacement graft material in human periodontal osseous defects. 6-month results. J Periodontol 1998; 69: 655–663.
10.1902/jop.1998.69.6.655 Google Scholar
- 42 Yukna RA, Krauser JT, Callan DP, Evans GH, Cruz R, Martin M. Multi-center clinical comparison of combination anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix (ABM)/cell binding peptide (P-15) and ABM in human periodontal osseous defects. 6-month results. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 1671–1679.
- 43 Butz F, Bächle M, Ofer M, Marquardt K, Kohal RJ. Sinus augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite/synthetic peptide in a sodium hyaluronate carrier (PepGen P-15 Putty): a clinical investigation of different healing times. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 1317–1323.
- 44 Degidi M, Scarano A, Iezzi G, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation using a synthetic cell-binding peptide: a histologic and transmission electron microscopy case study in man. Implant Dent 2005; 14: 371–375.
- 45 Engler-Hamm D, Cheung WS, Yen A, Stark PC, Griffin T. Ridge preservation using a composite bone graft and a bioabsorbable membrane with and without primary wound closure: a comparative clinical trial. J Periodontol 2011; 82: 377–387.
- 46 Harling DW. Consistency of ASA grading. Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 659.
- 47 Little JP. Consistency of ASA grading. Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 658–659.
- 48 Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Säge-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11: 318–326.
- 49
Brown H, Prescott R. Applied mixed models in medicine. Statistics in practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2006: 478.
10.1002/0470023589 Google Scholar
- 50 Degidi M, Piattelli A, Perrotti V, Iezzi G. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of an implant retrieved 8 years after insertion in a sinus augmented with anorganic bovine bone and anorganic bovine matrix associated with a cell-binding peptide: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012; 32: 451–457.
- 51 Degidi M, Piattelli M, Scarano A, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a synthetic cell-binding peptide: histological and histomorphometrical results in humans. J Oral Implantol 2004; 30: 376–383.
- 52
Traini T, Piattelli A, Caputi S, et al. Regeneration of human bone using different bone substitute biomaterials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12089
10.1111/cid.12089 Google Scholar
- 53 Pettinicchio M, Traini T, Murmura G, et al. Histologic and histomorphometric results of three bone graft substitutes after sinus augmentation in humans. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 45–53.
- 54
Kim D, Kang T, Gober D, Orlich C. A liquid membrane as a barrier membrane for guided bone regeneration. International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Dentistry 2011: 468282. DOI: 10.5402/2011/468282
10.5402/2011/468282 Google Scholar
- 55 Lindfors LT, Tervonen EA, Sandor GK, Ylikontiola LP. Guided bone regeneration using a titanium-reinforced ePTFE membrane and particulate autogenous bone: the effect of smoking and membrane exposure. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: 825–830.
- 56 Todisco M. Early loading of implants in vertically augmented bone with non-resorbable membranes and deproteinised anorganic bovine bone. An uncontrolled prospective cohort study. Eur J Oral Implantol 2010; 3: 47–58.
- 57 Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20(Suppl 4): 113–123.
- 58 Verardi S, Simion M. Management of the exposure of e-PTFE membranes in guided bone regeneration. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2007; 19: 111–117.
- 59 Kohal RJ, Mellas P, Hürzeler MB, Trejo PM, Morrison E, Caffesse RG. The effects of guided bone regeneration and grafting on implants placed into immediate extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs. J Periodontol 1998; 69: 927–937.
- 60 Zitzmann NU, Naef R, Schärer P. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 844–852.
- 61 Simion M, Baldoni M, Rossi P, Zaffe D. A comparative study of the effectiveness of e-PTFE membranes with and without early exposure during the healing period. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994; 14: 166–180.
- 62 Nowzari H, Slots J. Microbiologic and clinical study of polytetrafluoroethylene membranes for guided bone regeneration around implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 67–73.
- 63 Buser D, Dula K, Hirt HP, Berthold H. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. In: D Buser, C Dahlin, R Schenk, eds. Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing, 1994: 189–232.
- 64 van Steenberghe D, Johansson C, Quirynen M, Molly L, Albrektsson T, Naert I. Bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium barrier. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 63–71.
- 65 Watzinger F, Luksch J, Millesi W, et al. Guided bone regeneration with titanium membranes: a clinical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 38: 312–315.
- 66 Blanco J, Alonso A, Sanz M. Long-term results and survival rate of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year case series prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 294–301.
- 67 Canullo L, Malagnino VA. Vertical ridge augmentation around implants by e-PTFE titanium-reinforced membrane and bovine bone matrix: a 24- to 54-month study of 10 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 858–866.
- 68 De Boever AL, De Boever JA. Guided bone regeneration around non-submerged implants in narrow alveolar ridges: a prospective long-term clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 549–556.
- 69 Dogan N, Okcu KM, Ortakoglu K, Dalkiz M, Gunaydin Y. Barrier membrane and bone graft treatments of dehiscence-type defect at existing implant: a case report. Implant Dent 2003; 12: 145–150.
- 70 Veis AA, Tsirlis AT, Parisis NA. Effect of autogenous harvest site location on the outcome of ridge augmentation for implant dehiscences. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24: 155–163.
- 71 Hämmerle CH, Karring T. Guided bone regeneration at oral implant sites. Periodontol 2000 1998; 17: 151–175.
- 72 Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Single stage surgery combining transmucosal implant placement with guided bone regeneration and bioresorbable materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 9–18.
- 73 Jung RE, Halg GA, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CH. A randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new membrane for guided bone regeneration around dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 162–168.
- 74 Jovanovic SA, Spiekermann H, Richter EJ. Bone regeneration around titanium dental implants in dehisced defect sites: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 233–245.
- 75 Machtei EE. The effect of membrane exposure on the outcome of regenerative procedures in humans: a meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 512–516.
- 76 Hockers T, Abensur D, Valentini P, Legrand R, Hammerle CH. The combined use of bioresorbable membranes and xenografts or autografts in the treatment of bone defects around implants. A study in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 487–498.
- 77 Tehemar S, Hanes P, Sharawy M. Enhancement of osseointegration of implants placed into extraction sockets of healthy and periodontally diseased teeth by using graft material, an ePTFE membrane, or a combination. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 193–211.