A 1-Year Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Study of Early-Loaded Bone Level Implants in the Posterior Maxilla
Corresponding Author
Aleksa Marković DDS, PhD
Professor
Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Corresponding Author: Dr. Aleksa Marković, Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica 4, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorSnježana Čolić DDS, PhD
Professor
Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorMiodrag Šćepanović DDS, PhD
Assistant professor
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorTijana Mišić DDS, PhD
Doctor
Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorAna Ðinić DDS
Doctor
Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorDinesh Sharma Bhusal DDS, MSc
Doctor
Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Aleksa Marković DDS, PhD
Professor
Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Corresponding Author: Dr. Aleksa Marković, Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica 4, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorSnježana Čolić DDS, PhD
Professor
Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorMiodrag Šćepanović DDS, PhD
Assistant professor
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorTijana Mišić DDS, PhD
Doctor
Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorAna Ðinić DDS
Doctor
Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorDinesh Sharma Bhusal DDS, MSc
Doctor
Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Purposes
The primary aim of the study was to investigate a 1-year success rate of early-loaded bone level implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted, large grit, acid-etched surface (SLActive®, Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) in the posterior maxilla. Secondary objectives included stability of these implants and peri-implant bone level.
Materials and Methods
Bone level® implants (Institut Straumann AG) inserted into premolar and/or molar maxillary sites were loaded after 6 weeks of healing. The implants were monitored for 1 year using the following outcome measures: implant success, primary and secondary stability, and peri-implant bone level.
Results
Out of 37 implants placed in 13 patients, 36 reached sufficient stability and were early loaded, whereas one underwent a delayed loading protocol. One-year success rate of early-loaded implants was 100%. Implant stability at baseline was 71.7 ± 5. 6 to be steadily increased thereafter up to 1 year (80.3 ± 3.3), except at 2 weeks when a nonsignificant decrease was noticed (71.9 ± 3.9). Continuous and significant bone loss was observed, reaching 0.4 ± 0.1 mm in the first postoperative year.
Conclusion
Bone level implants with the SLActive surface placed into low-density bone and loaded after 6 weeks of healing can predictably achieve and maintain a successful tissue integration.
References
- 1 Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977; 16: 1–132.
- 2 Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Willings M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The effectiveness of immediate, early, and conventional loading of dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 893–904.
- 3 Roccuzzo M, Aglietta M, Cordaro L. Implant loading protocols for partially edentulous maxillary posterior sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24(Suppl): 147–157.
- 4 Markovic A, Calvo-Guirado JL, Lazic Z, et al. Evaluation of primary stability of self-tapping and non-self-tapping dental implants. A 12-week clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 15: 341–349.
- 5 Markovic A, Calasan D, Colic S, Stojcev-Stajcic L, Janjic B, Misic T. Implant stability in posterior maxilla: bone-condensing versus bone-drilling: a clinical study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112: 557–563.
- 6 Wu SW, Lee CC, Fu PY, Lin SC. The effects of flute shape and thread profile on the insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants. Med Eng Phys 2012; 34: 797–805.
- 7 Ostman PO, Hellman M, Wendelhag I, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19: 77–83, discussion 84.
- 8 O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2: 85–92.
- 9 Palmquist A, Omar OM, Esposito M, Lausmaa J, Thomsen P. Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome. J R Soc Interface 2010; 7(Suppl 5): S515–S527.
- 10 Le. Guehennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 844–854.
- 11 Novaes AB Jr, de Souza SL, de Barros RR, Pereira KK, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Influence of implant surfaces on osseointegration. Braz Dent J 2010; 21: 471–481.
- 12 Sennerby L, Gottlow J. Clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent controlled prospective clinical studies. Aust Dent J 2008; 53(Suppl 1): S82–S88.
- 13 Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 529–533.
- 14 Tugulu S, Lowe K, Scharnweber D, Schlottig F. Preparation of superhydrophilic microrough titanium implant surfaces by alkali treatment. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010; 21: 2751–2763.
- 15 Vasak C, Busenlechner D, Schwarze UY, et al. Early bone apposition to hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium implant surfaces: a histologic and histomorphometric study in minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12277
- 16 Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Ivanovski S, Donos N, Bosshardt DD. Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 349–356.
- 17 Wennerberg A, Galli S, Albrektsson T. Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2011; 3: 59–67.
- 18 Ganeles J, Zollner A, Jackowski J, ten Bruggenkate C, Beagle J, Guerra F. Immediate and early loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: 1-year results from a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 1119–1128.
- 19 Roccuzzo M, Wilson TG Jr. A prospective study of 3 weeks' loading of chemically modified titanium implants in the maxillary molar region: 1-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 65–72.
- 20 Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: PI Branemark, GA Zarb, TS Albrektsson, eds. Proceedings of the Tissue-Integrated Prosthesses:Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985: 199–210.
- 21 Esposito M, Worthington HV, Loli V, Coulthard P, Grusovin MG. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: antibiotics at dental implant placement to prevent complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; Jul:CD004152. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004152.pub3
- 22 Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 161–172.
- 23 Nicolau P, Korostoff J, Ganeles J, et al. Immediate and early loading of chemically modified implants in posterior jaws: 3-year results from a prospective randomized multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 15: 600–612.
- 24 Sullivan D, Vincenzi G, Feldman S. Early loading of Osseotite implants 2 months after placement in the maxilla and mandible: a 5-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 905–912.
- 25 Turkyilmaz I, Avci M, Kuran S, Ozbek EN. A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007; 9: 222–227.
- 26 Cochran D, Oates T, Morton D, Jones A, Buser D, Peters F. Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acid-etched surface. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 974–982.
- 27 Donos N, Hamlet S, Lang NP, et al. Gene expression profile of osseointegration of a hydrophilic compared with a hydrophobic microrough implant surface. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 365–372.
- 28 Oates TW, Valderrama P, Bischof M, et al. Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 755–760.
- 29 Markovic A, Colic S, Drazic R, Gacic B, Todorovic A, Stajcic Z. Resonance frequency analysis as a reliable criterion for early loading of sandblasted/acid-etched active surface implants placed by the osteotome sinus floor elevation technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 718–724.
- 30 Zollner A, Ganeles J, Korostoff J, Guerra F, Krafft T, Bragger U. Immediate and early non-occlusal loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: interim results from a prospective multicenter randomized-controlled study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 442–450.
- 31 Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 491–501.
- 32 Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 743–754.
- 33 Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 261–267.
- 34 Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000 2008; 47: 51–66.
- 35 Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 251–262.
- 36 Huwiler MA, Pjetursson BE, Bosshardt DD, Salvi GE, Lang NP. Resonance frequency analysis in relation to jawbone characteristics and during early healing of implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 275–280.
- 37 Han J, Lulic M, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 605–611.
- 38 Valderrama P, Oates TW, Jones AA, Simpson J, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Evaluation of two different resonance frequency devices to detect implant stability: a clinical trial. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 262–272.
- 39 Ferguson SJ, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 78: 291–297.
- 40 Glauser R, Sennerby L, Meredith N, et al. Resonance frequency analysis of implants subjected to immediate or early functional occlusal loading. Successful versus failing implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 428–434.
- 41 Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, de Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 76: 323–334.
- 42 Karabuda ZC, Abdel-Haq J, Arisan V. Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: a prospective 15-month evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 840–849.
- 43 Bornstein MM, Hart CN, Halbritter SA, Morton D, Buser D. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11: 338–347.
- 44 Morton D, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, et al. Early loading after 21 days of healing of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: two-year results of a prospective two-center study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12: 9–17.
- 45 Buser D, Wittneben J, Bornstein MM, Grutter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Stability of contour augmentation and esthetic outcomes of implant-supported single crowns in the esthetic zone: 3-year results of a prospective study with early implant placement postextraction. J Periodontol 2011; 82: 342–349.
- 46 Fischer K, Backstrom M, Sennerby L. Immediate and early loading of oxidized tapered implants in the partially edentulous maxilla: a 1-year prospective clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analysis study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11: 69–80.
- 47 Roccuzzo M, Wilson T. A prospective study evaluating a protocol for 6 weeks' loading of SLA implants in the posterior maxilla: one year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 502–507.