Volume 12, Issue 4 pp. 399-402
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effects of persistent Fontan fenestration patency on cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables

M. Elisabeth Heal DO, MSCR

Corresponding Author

M. Elisabeth Heal DO, MSCR

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Correspondence Elisabeth Heal, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia PA 19104. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Lanier B. Jackson MD, MSCR

Lanier B. Jackson MD, MSCR

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew M. Atz MD

Andrew M. Atz MD

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425

Search for more papers by this author
Ryan J. Butts MD

Ryan J. Butts MD

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75235

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 June 2017
Citations: 13

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) aids in clinical assessment of patients with Fontan circulation. Effects of persistent fenestration on CPET variables have not been clearly defined. Associations between fenestration and CPET variables at anaerobic threshold (AT) and peak exercise were explored in the Pediatric Heart Network Fontan Cross-Sectional Study cohort. Fenestration patency was associated with a greater decrease in oxygen saturation from rest to peak exercise (fenestration −4.9 ± 3.8 v. nonfenestration −3 ± 3.5; P < .001). Physiological dead space at peak exercise was higher in fenestrated v. nonfenestrated (25.2 ± 16.1 v. 21.4 ± 15.2; P = .03). There was a weak association between fenestration patency and maximal work and heart rate. Fenestration patency was also weakly correlated with oxygen pulse, work and VE/VCO2 at AT. The effect of persistent fenestration on CPET measurements was minimal in this study, likely due to the cross-sectional design.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.