Temporal changes in survival among adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in the period 2000–2016: a Danish population-based study
Corresponding Author
Lasse Hjort Jakobsen
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Correspondence: Lasse Hjort Jakobsen, Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Sdr. Skovvej 15, Aalborg DK-9000, Denmark.
E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAnne Stidsholt Roug
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorAndreas Kiesbye Øvlisen
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorClaus Werenberg Marcher
Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorHans Beier Ommen
Department of Hematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorKim Theilgaard-Mönch
Department of Hematology and Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet and Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorPeter Møller
Department of Hematology, Roskilde Sygehus, Roskilde, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorClaudia Schöllkopf
Department of Hematology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorDaniel Kristensen
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorTherese Maria Henriette Naur
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorMartin Bøgsted
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorTarec Christoffer El-Galaly
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorMarianne Tang Severinsen
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Lasse Hjort Jakobsen
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Correspondence: Lasse Hjort Jakobsen, Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Sdr. Skovvej 15, Aalborg DK-9000, Denmark.
E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAnne Stidsholt Roug
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorAndreas Kiesbye Øvlisen
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorClaus Werenberg Marcher
Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorHans Beier Ommen
Department of Hematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorKim Theilgaard-Mönch
Department of Hematology and Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet and Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorPeter Møller
Department of Hematology, Roskilde Sygehus, Roskilde, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorClaudia Schöllkopf
Department of Hematology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorDaniel Kristensen
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorTherese Maria Henriette Naur
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorMartin Bøgsted
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorTarec Christoffer El-Galaly
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorMarianne Tang Severinsen
Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
In the present study, we quantify the progress in overall survival (OS) during the period 2000–2016 among Danish patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). This population-based study, including 3820 adult patients with AML, demonstrates a significantly improved OS over time with the 2-year age-standardised OS increasing from 22% in 2002 to 31% in 2016. The improvement in OS was exclusively seen in patients with AML aged ≥50 years, with absolute improvements in 2-year OS from 2002 to 2016 of ≥10% among patients aged 50–75 years and a small absolute increase in those aged >75 years.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
bjh17213-sup-0001-Supinfo.docxWord document, 212.3 KB |
Data S1. Supplementary methods. Table S1. Results from two Cox models (i) adjusting for age and (ii) adjusting for age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status and AML subtype (de novo, secondary AML, therapy-related AML). Age was treated as a continuous variable and modelled using natural cubic splines with three degrees of freedom. The likelihood ratio test indicates whether a temporal change in overall survival (OS) was observed. The null model in the likelihood ratio test included the variables in the reported model except the diagnostic time period. Table S2. Results from three Cox models investigating (i) sex difference in overall survival (OS), (ii) sex differences in OS adjusted for age, and (iii) sex differences in the temporal improvement of OS. The likelihood ratio test was conducted by comparing to a model without an interaction between sex and calendar period. Table S3. Results from Cox proportional hazards models stratified on cytogenetic risk group. For each risk group, a univariable (including only diagnostic time period) and adjusted (also including age at diagnosis modelled by a natural cubic spline) Cox model is fitted and a likelihood ratio test is performed. The null model in the likelihood ratio test included the variables in the reported model except time period of diagnosis. P values for each likelihood ratio test are reported in the table. LRT, likelihood ratio test. Table S4. Hazard ratios comparing mortality in different time periods for adult patients with AML treated with intensive chemotherapy. Age was treated as a continuous variable and modelled using natural cubic splines with three degrees of freedom. The likelihood ratio test indicates whether a temporal change in overall survival (OS) was observed. The null model in the likelihood ratio test included the variables in the reported model except time period of diagnosis. Table S5. Results from Cox proportional hazards models stratified on treatment group. For each treatment group, a univariable (including only diagnostic time period) and adjusted (also including age at diagnosis modelled by a natural cubic spline) Cox model is fitted and a likelihood ratio test is performed. The null model in the likelihood ratio test included the variables in the reported model except time period of diagnosis. P values for each likelihood ratio test are reported in the table. LRT, likelihood ratio test. Table S6. Degrees of freedom for all natural cubic splines used to model 2-year overall survival (OS). Fig S1. (A) The 2-year crude and age-standardised relative survival against year of diagnosis for adult Danish patients with AML. (B) Age-stratified 2-year relative survival as function of diagnosis year. The shaded areas indicate pointwise 95% confidence intervals. Fig S2. The 2-year age-standardised overall survival against year of diagnosis for adult Danish patients with AML stratified according to cytogenetic risk profile. Modelling the 2-year age-standardised overall survival for patients with a favourable cytogenetic risk profile was not feasible due to the limited sample size. Fig S3. Temporal overall survival for Danish patients with AML diagnosed in 2000–2016 and treated with intensive chemotherapy within 30 days of diagnosis. Fig S4. The 2-year overall survival for patients with AML treated with intensive chemotherapy stratified by age at diagnosis. Results for patients aged >75 years were excluded due to the small number of patients treated with intensive chemotherapy in this age group. The shaded areas indicate pointwise 95% confidence intervals. Fig S5. The 2-year crude and age-standardised survival for patients receiving ASCT after first CR following intensive chemotherapy. The age-standardised survival is based on the age distribution of all transplanted patients who were diagnosed in the period 2007–2016. Fig S6. (A) The 2-year crude and age-standardised overall survival (OS) against year of diagnosis for adult Danish patients with AML with ≥30% blasts in blood or bone marrow at diagnosis. (B) Age-stratified 2-year OS as function of diagnosis year. The shaded areas indicate pointwise 95% confidence intervals. Fig S7. Temporal overall survival estimates for patients with AML with ≥30% blasts in blood or bone marrow at diagnosis. P values were obtained from log-rank tests. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- 1Burnett A, Wetzler M, Löwenberg B. Therapeutic advances in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 487–94.
- 2Dombret H, Seymour JF, Butrym A, Wierzbowska A, Selleslag D, Jang JH, et al. International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs conventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with >30% blasts. Blood. 2015; 126: 291–9.
- 3Juliusson G, Hagberg O, Lazarevic VL, Ölander E, Antunovic P, Cammenga J, et al. Improved survival of men 50 to 75 years old with acute myeloid leukemia over a 20-year period. Blood. 2019; 134: 1558–61.
- 4Koreth J, Schlenk R, Kopecky KJ, Honda S, Sierra J, Djulbegovic BJ, et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission. JAMA. 2009; 301: 2349–61.
- 5Østgård LS, Nørgaard JM, Raaschou-Jensen KK, Pedersen RS, Rønnov-Jessen D, Pedersen PT, et al. The Danish national acute leukemia registry. Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 8: 553–60.
- 6Royston P, Parmar MK. Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects. Stat Med. 2002; 21: 2175–97.
- 7Liu XR, Pawitan Y, Clements M. Parametric and penalized generalized survival models. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018; 27: 1531–46.
- 8Lambert PC, Dickman PW, Rutherford MJ. Comparison of different approaches to estimating age standardized net survival. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015; 15: 64.
- 9Grimwade D, Hills RK, Moorman AV, Walker H, Chatters S, Goldstone AH, et al. Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: Determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. Blood. 2010; 116: 354–65.
- 10Vardiman JW, Harris NL, Brunning RD. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms. Blood. 2002; 100: 2292–302.
- 11Rosella LC, Calzavara A, Frank JW, Fitzpatrick T, Donnelly PD, Henry D. Narrowing mortality gap between men and women over two decades: a registry-based study in Ontario, Canada. BMJ Open. 2016; 6:e012564.
- 12Fey MF, Buske C, ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Acute myeloblastic leukaemias in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013; 24(Suppl 6): vi138–43.
- 13Estey EH. Acute myeloid leukemia: 2013 update on risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2013;88: 318–27.
- 14 University of California Berkeley, (USA) & Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, (Germany). Human Mortality Database. Available at: https://www.mortality.org/hmd/DNK/STATS/bltper_1x1.txt. Accessed 8 September 2020.
- 15Juliusson G. Most 70- to 79-year-old patients with acute myeloid leukemia do benefit from intensive treatment. Blood. 2011; 117: 3473–4.