Volume 164, Issue 6 pp. 790-803
Research Paper

Psychosocial factors associated with impact of cancer in longterm haematological cancer survivors

Ania Korszun

Corresponding Author

Ania Korszun

Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Correspondence: Professor Ania Korszun, Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Shah-Jalal Sarker

Shah-Jalal Sarker

Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Kashfia Chowdhury

Kashfia Chowdhury

Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Charlotte Clark

Charlotte Clark

Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Paul Greaves

Paul Greaves

Centre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Rachel Johnson

Rachel Johnson

Centre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Judith Kingston

Judith Kingston

Centre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Gill Levitt

Gill Levitt

Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital Trust, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Janet Matthews

Janet Matthews

Centre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Peter White

Peter White

Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew Lister

Andrew Lister

Centre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
John Gribben

John Gribben

Centre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 December 2013
Citations: 34

Summary

To assess the impact of cancer (IOC) on subsequent quality of life (QOL), 718 long-term haematological cancer survivors completed validated psychosocial, functional and QOL scales, including IOC. Fifteen percent reported significant psychological distress, 18% high levels of fatigue and 10% moderate to severe functional impairment. These groups of participants also showed poorer QOL. There were no significant differences in psychological distress (= 0·76), fatigue (= 0·23) or functional impairment (= 0·74) across different cancer subtypes. Two separate hierarchical regression analyses examined the combined association of disease-type, psychosocial and other factors on negative and positive IOC scores respectively. Higher negative IOC scores were significantly associated ( 0·001) with medical comorbidity, psychological distress, lower social support, high fatigue levels and functional impairment. Paediatric patients (diagnosed at <17 years) had significantly higher negative IOC scores than adult patients (= 0·001); greater years since diagnosis was significantly (< 0·001) associated with less negative IOC. Higher positive IOC was associated with acute leukaemia (= 0·01); lower positive IOC with paediatric patients (< 0·001), white ethnicity (< 0·001), higher education (= 0·003), no partner (= 0·01) and lower social support (= 0·01). Screening for medical comorbidity, psychological distress and fatigue identifies those needing most support and should allow earlier interventions to address negative and positive IOC to improve the well-being of cancer survivors.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.