Volume 46, Issue 6 pp. 1132-1141
MAIN TEXT

Importance of electromagnetic interactions between ICD and VAD devices—Mechanistic assessment

Bruno Schnegg

Corresponding Author

Bruno Schnegg

Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Centre for Advanced Heart Failure, Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Correspondence

Bruno Schnegg, Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Desiree Robson

Desiree Robson

Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Monika Fürholz

Monika Fürholz

Centre for Advanced Heart Failure, Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Tom Meredith

Tom Meredith

Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Cassia Kessler

Cassia Kessler

Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Samuel H. Baldinger

Samuel H. Baldinger

Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher Hayward

Christopher Hayward

Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 January 2022
Citations: 4

Bruno Schnegg, Desiree Robson, and Monika Fürholz contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

Background

Implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are established interventions that prolong life in advanced heart failure, but their combination has not been demonstrated as beneficial. Electromagnetic interference (EMI) produced by a LVAD can preclude ICD interrogation with external programmers. We undertook a systematic evaluation of the LVAD–ICD interaction “in-vitro” to clarify the extent of this interaction.

Methods

Using explanted ICDs and VADs in a mock physiological rig, we assessed interrogation and reprogramming of ICD devices in the presence of a running LVAD. When connectivity between the ICD programmer and the ICD failed, we attempted three different techniques to re-establish connectivity: (1) Electromagnetic shielding of the ICD with a pseudo-faraday cage; (2) altering the LVAD speed; and (3) increasing the distance between the VAD and the ICD.

Results

We tested a total of 24 ICDs from different manufacturers in the presence of the Heartware (HW) and HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVADs. With HW, we only observed interaction with Biotronik ICD devices at very close range (0–6 cm). With HM3, only Medtronic ICD devices showed no interaction. Interactions could be mitigated by increasing the VAD–ICD distance.

Conclusions

LVADs, notably the HM3, produce EMI that interferes with the communication between an ICD and its respective programmer. This may need to be considered when choosing the type of VAD to implant in patients with a previously implanted left-sided ICD. The only safe way to regain connectivity is to increase the distance between the VAD and the ICD, with patients raising their arm above their head.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest. They did not receive financial support for this work.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [BS], upon request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.