Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Versus Static Cold Storage in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Panxin Peng
Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
Panxin Peng and Zhenshan Ding contributed as the co-first author.
Search for more papers by this authorZhenshan Ding
Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
Panxin Peng and Zhenshan Ding contributed as the co-first author.
Search for more papers by this authorYuhui He
Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorJun Zhang
Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorXuming Wang
Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Zhihao Yang
Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Zhihao Yang, Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, No.2 Yinghua East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorPanxin Peng
Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
Panxin Peng and Zhenshan Ding contributed as the co-first author.
Search for more papers by this authorZhenshan Ding
Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
Panxin Peng and Zhenshan Ding contributed as the co-first author.
Search for more papers by this authorYuhui He
Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorJun Zhang
Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorXuming Wang
Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Zhihao Yang
Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Zhihao Yang, Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, No.2 Yinghua East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Static cold storage (SCS) and hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) are two primary options for renal allograft preservation. Compared with SCS, HMP decreased the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and protected graft function. However, more evidence is still needed to prove the advantages of the HMP. In this study, the outcomes of kidney grafts from the two preservation methods were compared by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of hypothermic machine perfusion and static cold storage in deceased donor kidney transplantation were identified through searches of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases between January 1, 1980 and December 30, 2017. The primary endpoints were delayed graft function and graft survival. Secondary endpoints included primary non-function (PNF), graft renal function, duration of DGF, acute rejection, postoperative hospital stay and patient survival. Summary effects were calculated as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 13 RCTs were included, including 2048 kidney transplant recipients. The results indicated that compared with SCS, HMP decreased the incidence of DGF (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69–0.87, P < 0.0001), and improved the graft survival at 3 years (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02–1.11, P = 0.009). There was no significant difference in other endpoints. HMP might be a more desirable method of preservation for kidney grafts. The long-term outcomes of kidney allografts stored by hypothermic machine perfusion still need to be further investigated.
Funding Information
This study was supported by Erasmus+ (Grant No. 573787-EPP-1-2016-1-ES-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP).
Conflict of Interest
All the authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
aor13364-sup-0001-FigS1.tifTIFF image, 130.6 KB | FIG. S1. DGF sensitivity analysis in studies with the same definition of DGF. |
aor13364-sup-0002-FigS2.tifTIFF image, 98.8 KB | FIG. S2. Duration of DGF sensitivity analysis that the aforementioned study was excluded. |
aor13364-sup-0003-FigS3.tifTIFF image, 81.9 KB | FIG. S3. Postoperative hospital stay sensitivity analysis that the aforementioned study was excluded. |
aor13364-sup-0004-FigS4.tifTIFF image, 218.8 KB | FIG. S4. Forest plots illustrating the meta-analysis of outcomes in HMP versus SCS of donor kidneys. The outcomesanalyzed were (A) DGF and graft survival at 1 (B) year in DBD. |
aor13364-sup-0005-FigS5.tifTIFF image, 212.4 KB | FIG. S5. Forest plots illustrating the meta-analysis of outcomes in HMP versus SCS of donor kidneys. The outcomesanalyzed were (A) DGF and graft survival at 1 (B) year in DCD. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- 1Mahillo B, Carmona M, Álvarez M, Noel L, Matesanz R. Global database on donation and transplantation: goals, methods and critical issues (www.transplant-observatory.org). Transplant Rev 2013; 27: 57–60.
- 2Kaths JM, Paul A, Robinson LA, Selzner M. Ex vivo machine perfusion for renal graft preservation. Transplant Rev 2018; 32: 1–9.
- 3Gallinat A, Amrillaeva V, Hoyer DP, et al. Reconditioning by end-ischemic hypothermic in-house machine perfusion: a promising strategy to improve outcome in expanded criteria donors kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 2017; 31: e12904.
- 4Patel K, Nath J, Hodson J, Inston N, Ready A. Outcomes of donation after circulatory death kidneys undergoing hypothermic machine perfusion following static cold storage: a UK population-based cohort study. Am J Transplant 2018; 18: 1408–14.
- 5Yao L, Zhou H, Wang Y, et al. Hypothermic machine perfusion in DCD kidney transplantation: a single center experience. Urol Int 2016; 96: 148–51.
- 6Forde JC, Shields WP, Azhar M, et al. Single centre experience of hypothermic machine perfusion of kidneys from extended criteria deceased heart-beating donors: a comparative study. Ir J Med Sci 2016; 185: 121–5.
- 7Hameed AM, Hawthorne WJ, Pleass HC. Advances in organ preservation for transplantation. ANZ J Surg 2017; 87: 976–80.
- 8Bathini V, McGregor T, McAlister VC, Luke PP, Sener A. Renal perfusion pump vs cold storage for donation after cardiac death kidneys: a systematic review. J Urol 2013; 189: 2214–20.
- 9Jiao B, Liu S, Liu H, Cheng D, Cheng Y, Liu Y. Hypothermic machine perfusion reduces delayed graft function and improves one-year graft survival of kidneys from expanded criteria donors: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8: e81826.
- 10O'Callaghan JM, Morgan RD, Knight SR, Morris PJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of hypothermic machine perfusion versus static cold storage of kidney allografts on transplant outcomes. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 991–1001.
- 11Lam VW, Laurence JM, Richardson AJ, Pleass HC, Allen RD. Hypothermic machine perfusion in deceased donor kidney transplantation: a systematic review. J Surg Res 2013; 180: 176–82.
- 12Cohen MFMW. Comparison of cold storage and machine perfusion in the preservation of cadaver kidneys: a prospective, randomized study. Transp Proc 1985; No 1(XVII): 1474–7.
- 13Tedesco-Silva HJ, Mello Offerni JC, Ayres Carneiro V, et al. Randomized trial of machine perfusion versus cold storage in recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants with high incidence of delayed graft function. Transplant Direct 2017; 3: e155.
- 14Wang W, Xie D, Hu X, Yin H, Liu H, Zhang X. Effect of hypothermic machine perfusion on the preservation of kidneys donated after cardiac death: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial. Artif Organs 2017; 41: 753–8.
- 15Zhong Z, Lan J, Ye S, et al. Outcome improvement for hypothermic machine perfusion versus cold storage for kidneys from cardiac death donors. Artif Organs 2017; 41: 647–53.
- 16Watson CJ, Wells AC, Roberts RJ, et al. Cold machine perfusion versus static cold storage of kidneys donated after cardiac death: a UK multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 1991–9.
- 17Moers C, Pirenne J, Paul A, Ploeg RJ. Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 770–1.
- 18Kwiatkowski A, Wszola M, Kosieradzki M, et al. The early and long term function and survival of kidney allografts stored before transplantation by hypothermic pulsatile perfusion. A prospective randomized study. Ann Transplant 2009; 14: 14–17.
- 19van der Vliet JA, Kievit JK, Hene RJ, Hilbrands LB, Kootstra G. Preservation of non-heart-beating donor kidneys: a clinical prospective randomised case-control study of machine perfusion versus cold storage. Transplant Proc 2001; 33: 847.
- 20Matsuno N, Sakurai E, Tamaki I, Uchiyama M, Kozaki K, Kozaki M. The effect of machine perfusion preservation versus cold storage on the function of kidneys from non-heart-beating donors. Transplantation 1994; 57: 293–4.
- 21Merion RM, Oh HK, Port FK, Toledo-Pereyra LH, Turcotte JG. A prospective controlled trial of cold-storage versus machine-perfusion preservation in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 1990; 50: 230–3.
- 22Jaffers GJ, Banowsky LH. The absence of a deleterious effect of mechanical kidney preservation in the era of cyclosporine. Transplantation 1989; 47: 734–6.
- 23Heil JE, Canafax DM, Sutherland DE, Simmons RL, Dunning M, Najarian JS. A controlled comparison of kidney preservation by two methods: machine perfusion and cold storage. Transplant Proc 1987; 19: 2046.
- 24Halloran P, Aprile M. A randomized prospective trial of cold storage versus pulsatile perfusion for cadaver kidney preservation. Transplantation 1987; 43: 827–32.
- 25Jochmans I, Moers C, Smits JM, et al. Machine perfusion versus cold storage for the preservation of kidneys donated after cardiac death: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2010; 252: 756–64.
- 26Treckmann J, Moers C, Smits JM, et al. Machine perfusion versus cold storage for preservation of kidneys from expanded criteria donors after brain death. Transpl Int 2011; 24: 548–54.
- 27Higgins JPT GSe. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: www.handbook.cochrane.org.
- 28De Deken J, Kocabayoglu P, Moers C. Hypothermic machine perfusion in kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2016; 21: 294–300.
- 29Gallinat A, Moers C, Treckmann J, et al. Machine perfusion versus cold storage for the preservation of kidneys from donors >/= 65 years allocated in the Eurotransplant Senior Programme. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27: 4458–63.
- 30Sierra-Parraga JM, Eijken M, Hunter J, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells as anti-inflammatory and regenerative mediators for donor kidneys during normothermic machine perfusion. Stem Cells Dev 2017; 26: 1162–70.
- 31Jochmans I, O'Callaghan JM, Pirenne J, Ploeg RJ. Hypothermic machine perfusion of kidneys retrieved from standard and high-risk donors. Transpl Int 2015; 28: 665–76.
- 32Matos ACC, Requiao Moura LR, Borrelli M, et al. Impact of machine perfusion after long static cold storage on delayed graft function incidence and duration and time to hospital discharge. Clin Transplant 2018; 32: e13130.
- 33Bond M, Pitt M, Akoh J, Moxham T, Hoyle M, Anderson R. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of methods of storing donated kidneys from deceased donors: a systematic review and economic model. Health Tech Assessment 2009; 13(38): 1–156.
- 34Karimian N, Yeh H. Opportunities for therapeutic intervention during machine perfusion. Curr Transplant Rep 2017; 4: 141–8.
- 35Paredes-Zapata D, Ruiz-Arranz A, Rodriguez-Villar C, et al. Does the pulsatile preservation machine have any impact in the discard rate of kidneys from older donors after brain death? Transplant Proc 2015; 47: 2324–7.
- 36Hosgood SA, Yang B, Bagul A, Mohamed IH, Nicholson ML. A comparison of hypothermic machine perfusion versus static cold storage in an experimental model of renal ischemia reperfusion injury. Transplantation 2010; 89: 830–7.
- 37He N, Li JH, Jia JJ, et al. Hypothermic machine perfusion's protection on porcine kidney graft uncovers greater Akt-Erk phosphorylation. Transplant Proc 2017; 49: 1923–9.