3D-Printed PCL/rGO Conductive Scaffolds for Peripheral Nerve Injury Repair
Corresponding Author
Sanjairaj Vijayavenkataraman
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sanjairaj Vijayavenkataraman, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore. E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSiti Thaharah
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore
Search for more papers by this authorShuo Zhang
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore
Search for more papers by this authorWen Feng Lu
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore
Search for more papers by this authorJerry Ying Hsi Fuh
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore
NUS Research Institute, Suzhou, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sanjairaj Vijayavenkataraman
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sanjairaj Vijayavenkataraman, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore. E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSiti Thaharah
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore
Search for more papers by this authorShuo Zhang
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore
Search for more papers by this authorWen Feng Lu
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore
Search for more papers by this authorJerry Ying Hsi Fuh
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore
NUS Research Institute, Suzhou, China
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The incidence of peripheral nerve injuries is on the rise and the current gold standard for treatment of such injuries is nerve autografting. Given the severe limitations of nerve autografts which include donor site morbidity and limited supply, neural guide conduits (NGCs) are considered as an effective alternative treatment. Conductivity is a desired property of an ideal NGC. Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) possesses several advantages in addition to its conductive nature such as high surface area to volume ratio due to its nanostructure and has been explored for its use in tissue engineering. However, most of the works reported are on traditional 2D culture with a layer of rGO coating, while the native tissue microenvironment is three-dimensional. In this study, PCL/rGO scaffolds are fabricated using electrohydrodynamic jet (EHD-jet) 3D printing method as a proof of concept study. Mechanical and material characterization of the printed PCL/rGO scaffolds and PCL scaffolds was done. The addition of rGO results in softer scaffolds which is favorable for neural differentiation. In vitro neural differentiation studies using PC12 cells were also performed. Cell proliferation was higher in the PCL/rGO scaffolds than the PCL scaffolds. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunocytochemistry results reveal that PCL/rGO scaffolds support neural differentiation of PC12 cells.
References
- 1Novoselov KS, Fal V, Colombo L, Gellert P, Schwab M, Kim K. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 2012; 490: 192–200.
- 2Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 2008; 321: 385–8.
- 3Stoller MD, Park S, Zhu Y, An J, Ruoff RS. Graphene-based ultracapacitors. Nano Lett 2008; 8: 3498–502.
- 4Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao W, et al. Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett 2008; 8: 902–7.
- 5Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004; 306: 666–9.
- 6Shen H, Zhang L, Liu M, Zhang Z. Biomedical applications of graphene. Theranostics 2012; 2: 283–94.
- 7Chen Z, Xu C, Ma C, Ren W, Cheng HM. Lightweight and flexible graphene foam composites for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Adv Mater 2013; 25: 1296–300.
- 8Liu C, Yu Z, Neff D, Zhamu A, Jang BZ. Graphene-based supercapacitor with an ultrahigh energy density. Nano Lett 2010; 10: 4863–8.
- 9Miao X, Tongay S, Petterson MK, et al. High efficiency graphene solar cells by chemical doping. Nano Lett 2012; 12: 2745–50.
- 10Liu M, Zhang R, Chen W. Graphene-supported nanoelectrocatalysts for fuel cells: synthesis, properties, and applications. Chem Rev 2014; 114: 5117–60.
- 11Eda G, Fanchini G, Chhowalla M. Large-area ultrathin films of reduced graphene oxide as a transparent and flexible electronic material. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008; 3: 270.
- 12Shao Y, Wang J, Wu H, Liu J, Aksay IA, Lin Y. Graphene based electrochemical sensors and biosensors: a review. Electroanalysis 2010; 22: 1027–36.
- 13Goenka S, Sant V, Sant S. Graphene-based nanomaterials for drug delivery and tissue engineering. J Controlled Release 2014; 173: 75–88.
- 14Feng L, Zhang S, Liu Z. Graphene based gene transfection. Nanoscale 2011; 3: 1252–7.
- 15Akhavan O, Ghaderi E, Aghayee S, Fereydooni Y, Talebi A. The use of a glucose-reduced graphene oxide suspension for photothermal cancer therapy. J Mater Chem 2012; 22: 13773–81.
- 16Zhu C, Du D, Lin Y. Graphene and graphene-like 2D materials for optical biosensing and bioimaging: a review. 2D Mater 2015; 2: 032004.
- 17Liu S, Zeng TH, Hofmann M, et al. Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano 2011; 5: 6971–80.
- 18Akhavan O. Graphene scaffolds in progressive nanotechnology/stem cell-based tissue engineering of the nervous system. J Mater Chem B. 2016; 4: 3169–90.
- 19Depan D, Girase B, Shah J, Misra R. Structure–process–property relationship of the polar graphene oxide-mediated cellular response and stimulated growth of osteoblasts on hybrid chitosan network structure nanocomposite scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2011; 7: 3432–45.
- 20Lee WC, Lim CHY, Shi H, et al. Origin of enhanced stem cell growth and differentiation on graphene and graphene oxide. ACS Nano. 2011; 5: 7334–41.
- 21Ryoo S-R, Kim Y-K, Kim M-H, Min D-H. Behaviors of NIH-3T3 fibroblasts on graphene/carbon nanotubes: proliferation, focal adhesion, and gene transfection studies. ACS Nano. 2010; 4: 6587–98.
- 22Brownson DA, Banks CE. The electrochemistry of CVD graphene: progress and prospects. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012; 14: 8264–81.
- 23Vijayavenkataraman S, Shuo Z, Fuh JY, Lu WF. Design of three-dimensional scaffolds with tunable matrix stiffness for directing stem cell lineage specification: An in silico study. Bioengineering 2017; 4: 66.
10.3390/bioengineering4030066 Google Scholar
- 24Li N, Zhang Q, Gao S, et al. Three-dimensional graphene foam as a biocompatible and conductive scaffold for neural stem cells. Sci Rep. 2013; 3: 1604.
- 25Crowder SW, Prasai D, Rath R, et al. Three-dimensional graphene foams promote osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Nanoscale 2013; 5: 4171–6.
- 26Wan C, Chen B. Poly (ε-caprolactone)/graphene oxide biocomposites: mechanical properties and bioactivity. Biomed Mater 2011; 6: 055010.
- 27Song J, Gao H, Zhu G, Cao X, Shi X, Wang Y. The preparation and characterization of polycaprolactone/graphene oxide biocomposite nanofiber scaffolds and their application for directing cell behaviors. Carbon. 2015; 95: 1039–50.
- 28Liu H, Vijayavenkataraman S, Wang D, Jing L, Sun J, He K. Influence of electrohydrodynamic jetting parameters on the morphology of PCL scaffolds. Int J Bioprinting. 2017; 3: 72–82.
- 29Wu Y, Wu B, Vijayavenkataraman S, San Wong Y, Fuh JYH. Crimped fiber with controllable patterns fabricated via electrohydrodynamic jet printing. Mater Des 2017; 131: 384–93.
- 30Vijayavenkataraman S, Zhang S, Lu WF, Fuh JYH. Electrohydrodynamic-jetting (EHD-jet) 3D-printed functionally graded scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. J Mater Res 2018; 1–13.
- 31Vijayavenkataraman SZhang S, Thaharah S, et al. Electrohydrodynamic Jet 3D printed nerve guide conduits (NGCs) for peripheral nerve injury repair. Polymers 2018; 10: 753.
- 32Balint R, Cassidy NJ, Cartmell SH. Conductive polymers: towards a smart biomaterial for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2014; 10: 2341–53.
- 33Vijayavenkataraman S. A perspective on bioprinting ethics. Artif Organs. 2016; 40: 1033–8.
- 34Vijayavenkataraman S, Lu W, Fuh J. 3D bioprinting of skin: A state-of-the-art review on modelling, materials, and processes. Biofabrication. 2016; 8: 032001.
- 35Middleton JC, Tipton AJ. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Biomaterials. 2000; 21: 2335–46.
- 36Lackington WA, Ryan AJ, O’Brien FJ. Advances in nerve guidance conduit-based therapeutics for peripheral nerve repair. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2017; 3: 1221–35.
- 37Kurapati R, Russier J, Squillaci MA, et al. Dispersibility-dependent biodegradation of graphene oxide by myeloperoxidase. Small 2015; 11: 3985–94.
- 38Kurapati R, Bonachera F, Russier J, et al. Covalent chemical functionalization enhances the biodegradation of graphene oxide. 2D Mater 2017; 5: 015020.
10.1088/2053-1583/aa8f0a Google Scholar
- 39Chen F, Zhang J, Wang F, Shi G. Raman spectroscopic studies on the structural changes of electrosynthesized polypyrrole films during heating and cooling processes. J Appl Polym Sci 2003; 89: 3390–5.
- 40Vigmond SJ, Ghaemmaghami V, Thompson M. Raman and resonance-Raman spectra of polypyrrole with application to sensor–gas probe interactions. Can J Chem 1995; 73: 1711–8.