Effect of three different photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy on bond strength of a calcium silicate-based sealer to radicular dentin
Corresponding Author
Cihan Küden DDS, PhD
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
Correspondence
Cihan Küden, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana 01380, Turkey.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSeda Nur Karakaş DDS
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Cihan Küden DDS, PhD
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
Correspondence
Cihan Küden, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana 01380, Turkey.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSeda Nur Karakaş DDS
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
To evaluate the effect of the photodynamic therapy (PDT) using with different photosensitizers on the bond strength of BioRoot RCS (BR) to radicular dentin by comparing with AH Plus (AH). The shaped root canals of 80 human mandibular premolars were divided into four groups based on the final disinfection protocol: NaOCl/EDTA, PDT with methylene Blue (MB), PDT with curcumin (CUR) and PDT with toluidine blue O (TBO) (n = 20). Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups (n = 10), according to the endodontic sealer used for obturation (n = 10). The test of push-out bond strength (PBS) was performed using an universal test machine. The data were analysed using ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc, and independent sample t-test (α = 0.05). MB-BR group showed the highest PBS at the cervical level (p < 0.05). The selection of the photosensitizer in PDT influenced adhesion of root canal sealers to radicular dentin.
REFERENCES
- 1Chrepa V, Kotsakis GA, Pagonis TC, Hargreaves KM. The effect of photodynamic therapy in root canal disinfection: a systematic review. J Endod. 2014; 40: 891–8.
- 2Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, Lima KC. Chemomechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2.5%, and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2000; 26: 331–4.
- 3Ballal NV, Roy A, Zehnder M. Effect of sodium hypochlorite concentration in continuous chelation on dislodgement resistance of an epoxy resin and hydraulic calcium silicate sealer. Polymers. 2021; 13: 3482.
- 4Garcez AS, Arantes-Neto JG, Sellera DP, Fregnani ER. Effects of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and surgical endodontic treatment on the bacterial load reduction and periapical lesion healing. Three years follow up. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2015; 12: 575–80.
- 5Gursoy H, Ozcakir-Tomruk C, Tanalp J, Yılmaz S. Photodynamic therapy in dentistry: a literature review. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17: 1113–25.
- 6Bonsor S, Nichol R, Reid T, Pearson G. An alternative regimen for root canal disinfection. Brit Dent J. 2006; 201: 101–5.
- 7Allison RR, Moghissi K. Photodynamic therapy (PDT): PDT mechanisms. Clin Endoscopy. 2013; 46: 24–9.
- 8Plotino G, Grande N, Mercade M. Photodynamic therapy in endodontics. Int Endod J. 2019; 52: 760–74.
- 9Santezi C, Reina BD, Dovigo LN. Curcumin-mediated photodynamic therapy for the treatment of oral infections-a review. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2018; 21: 409–15.
- 10Alkahtany MF, Almadi KH, Sohail M, Alzahrani KM, Vohra F, Abduljabbar T. Influence of adjunctive photodynamic therapy (curcumin) on the extrusion bond strength of radicular dentin to contemporary root canal sealers. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021; 34:102341.
- 11Sahyon HBS, da Silva PP, de Oliveira MS, Cintra LTA, Dezan-Júnior E, Gomes-Filho JE, et al. Influence of curcumin photosensitizer in photodynamic therapy on the mechanical properties and push-out bond strength of glass-fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019; 25: 376–81.
- 12Ok E, Ertas H, Saygili G, Gok T. Effect of photo-activated disinfection on bond strength of three different root canal sealers. Eur J Dent. 2014; 8: 85–9.
- 13Borges RP, Sousa-Neto MD, Versiani MA, Rached-Júnior FA, De-Deus G, Miranda CES, et al. Changes in the surface of four calcium silicate-containing endodontic materials and an epoxy resin-based sealer after a solubility test. Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 419–28.
- 14Lee B-N, Hong J-U, Kim S-M, Jang J-H, Chang H-S, Hwang Y-C, et al. Anti-inflammatory and osteogenic effects of calcium silicate–based root canal sealers. J Endod. 2019; 45: 73–8.
- 15Simon S, Flouriot A-C. BioRoot™ RCS a new biomaterial for root canal filling. J Case Stud Collect. 2016; 13: 4–11.
- 16Alfawaz H, Alqedairi A, Alebdi A, Allahem Z, Alsubait S, Alharbi H. Bond strength of BioRoot RCS relative to different endodontic bioceramic sealers: in vitro push-out test. Pakistan Oral Dent J. 2018; 38: 528–31.
- 17Keskin G, Çiloğlu M. Efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and Er, Cr: YSGG laser-activated irrigation on dentinal tubule penetration of MTA-based root canal sealer: a confocal microscopy study. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021; 36:102584.
- 18Prado M, Simão RA, Gomes BP. Effect of different irrigation protocols on resin sealer bond strength to dentin. J Endod. 2013; 39: 689–92.
- 19Souza MA, Padilha Rauber MG, Zuchi N, Bonacina LV, Ricci R, Dias CT, et al. Influence of final irrigation protocols and endodontic sealer on bond strength of root filling material with root dentin previously treated with photodynamic therapy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019; 26: 137–41.
- 20Küden C, Karakaş SN. Photodynamic therapy and gaseous ozone versus conventional post space treatment methods on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts luting with different resin cements. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021; 36:102586.
- 21Al Ahdal K, Al Deeb L, Al-Hamdan RS, Bin-Shuwaish MS, Al Deeb M, Maawadh AM, et al. Influence of different photosensitizers on push-out bond strength of fiber post to radicular dentin. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020; 31:101805.
- 22Saffarpour M, Abasalizadeh F, Ms F, Chiniforush N. The in vitro effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with toluidine blue and indocyanine green on microleakage of class V cavities. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022; 39:103005.
- 23Souza MA, Pazinatto B, Bischoff KF, Palhano HS, Cecchin D, de Figueiredo JAP. Influence of ultrasonic activation over final irrigants in the removal of photosensitizer from root canal walls after photodynamic therapy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2017; 17: 216–20.
- 24Fisher MA, Berzins DW, Bahcall JK. An in vitro comparison of bond strength of various obturation materials to root canal dentin using a push-out test design. J Endod. 2007; 33: 856–8.
- 25Stelzer R, Schaller H-G, Gernhardt CR. Push-out bond strength of RealSeal SE and AH Plus after using different irrigation solutions. J Endod. 2014; 40: 1654–7.
- 26Donnermeyer D, Vahdat-Pajouh N, Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Influence of the final irrigation solution on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based, epoxy resin-based and silicone-based endodontic sealers. Odontology. 2019; 107: 231–6.
- 27Lim M, Jung C, Shin D-H, Cho Y-b, Song M. Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: a literature review. Restor Dent Endod. 2020; 45: e35.
- 28Siboni F, Taddei P, Zamparini F, Prati C, Gandolfi M. Properties of BioRoot RCS, a tricalcium silicate endodontic sealer modified with povidone and polycarboxylate. Int Endod J. 2017; 50: e120–36.
- 29Banci HA, Strazzi-Sahyon HB, Duarte MAH, Cintra L, Gomes-Filho JE, Chalub LO, et al. Influence of photodynamic therapy on bond strength and adhesive interface morphology of MTA based root canal sealer to different thirds of intraradicular dentin. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020; 32:102031.
- 30Reyhani M, Ghasemi N, Rahimi S, Milani A, Barhaghi M, Azadi A. Apical microleakage of AH Plus and MTA Fillapex® sealers in association with immediate and delayed post space preparation: a bacterial leakage study. Minerva Stomatol. 2015; 64: 129–34.
- 31Khalil I, Naaman A, Camilleri J. Properties of tricalcium silicate sealers. J Endod. 2016; 42: 1529–35.
- 32Elsayed MA, Hassanien EE, Elgendy AAE. Ageing of TotalFill BC sealer and MTA Fillapex in simulated body fluid. Eur Endod J. 2021; 6: 183–8.
- 33Sönmez I, Sönmez D, Almaz M. Evaluation of push-out bond strength of a new MTA-based sealer. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013; 14: 161–6.
- 34Yavari H, Ghasemi N, Divband B, Rezaei Y, Jabbari G, Payahoo S. The effect of photodynamic therapy and polymer solution containing nano-particles of Ag/ZnO on push-out bond strength of the sealers AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex. J Clin Experiment Dent. 2017; 9:e1109.
- 35Retana-Lobo C, Tanomaru-Filho M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Benavides-García M, Hernández-Meza E, Reyes-Carmona J. Push-out bond strength, characterization, and ion release of premixed and powder-liquid bioceramic sealers with or without gutta-percha. Scanning. 2021; 2021:6617930.