Volume 112, Issue 3 pp. 468-474
Research Report

Pharmaceutical sales of pseudoephedrine: the impact of electronic tracking systems on methamphetamine crime incidents

Lorraine Mazerolle

Corresponding Author

Lorraine Mazerolle

School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia

Correspondence to: Lorraine Mazerolle, School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Michie Building (9), Room 440, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Ingrid McGuffog

Ingrid McGuffog

Department of Criminal Justice, The College at Brockport, SUNY, Brockport, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jason Ferris

Jason Ferris

Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Mitchell B. Chamlin

Mitchell B. Chamlin

Department of Criminal Justice, Texas State University, San Marcos, Hines Academic Center, San Marcos, TX, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 October 2016
Citations: 9

Abstract

Background and aims

Electronic tracking systems (ETS) are used extensively in pharmacies across the United States and Australia to control suspicious sales of pseudoephedrine. This study measures the impact of one ETS–Project STOP—on the capacity of police to reduce production, supply and possession of methamphetamine.

Design

Using official police data of incidents of production, supply and possession from January 1996 to December 2011 (n = 192 data points/months over 16 years), we used a quasi-experimental, time–series approach.

Setting

The State of Queensland, Australia.

Participants

No individual participants are included in the study. The unit of analysis is reported police incidents.

Measurements

The study examines the impact of the ETS on production (n = 5938 incidents), drug supply and trafficking (n = 20 094 incidents) and drug possession or use (n = 118 926) of methamphetamine.

Findings

Introduction of the ETS in November 2005 was associated with an insignificant decrease (P = 0.15) in the production of methamphetamine. The intervention was associated with a statistically significant increase in supply incidents (P = 0.0001). There was no statistically significant effect on the incidence of possession (P = 0.59).

Conclusions

Electronic tracking systems can reduce the capacity of people to produce methamphetamine domestically, but seem unlikely to affect other aspects of the methamphetamine problem such as possession, distribution and importation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.