Creditor litigation and corporate innovation: Evidence from China
Corresponding Author
Jin Lu
School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Correspondence
Jin Lu, School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, No. 555, Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYaling Li
School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Search for more papers by this authorWenxiao Zou
School of Sociology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jin Lu
School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Correspondence
Jin Lu, School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, No. 555, Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYaling Li
School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Search for more papers by this authorWenxiao Zou
School of Sociology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Using data from 2007 to 2021 for Chinese listed companies, this study investigates the impact of creditor litigation on corporate innovation. It finds that companies involved in creditor litigation tend to reduce innovative patent applications. This finding persists across various tests and endogeneity analyses. Further investigation uncovers that this impact is particularly pronounced in firms with high-performance sensitivity, while it diminishes in firms with equity incentives. The mechanism analysis reveals the external pressures caused by creditor litigation, which leads to an escalation in a firm's operational expenses and compels a decrease in R&D investments, consequently constraining innovation.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The authors do not have permission to share data.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
acfi13364-sup-0001-AppendixS1-S2.docxWord 2007 document , 18.4 KB |
Appendix S1. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Altman, E.I. (1968) Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23, 589–609.
- Amore, M.D., Schneider, C. & Žaldokas, A. (2013) Credit supply and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3), 835–855.
- Arena, M. & Julio, B. (2015) The effects of securities class action litigation on corporate liquidity and investment policy. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(1–2), 251–275.
- Bates, T.W., Kahle, K.M. & Stulz, R.M. (2009) Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to? The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 1985–2021.
- Bertrand, M., Duflo, E. & Mullainathan, S. (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.
- Bhattacharya, S. & Ritter, J.R. (1983) Innovation and communication: Signalling with partial disclosure. The Review of Economic Studies, 50(2), 331–346.
- Cerqueiro, G., Hegde, D., Penas, M.F. & Seamans, R.C. (2017) Debtor rights, credit supply, and innovation. Management Science, 63(10), 3311–3327.
- Chemmanur, T.J., Loutskina, E. & Tian, X. (2014) Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), 2434–2473. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu033
- Chemmanur, T.J. & Tian, X. (2018) Do antitakeover provisions spur corporate innovation? A regression discontinuity analysis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(3), 1163–1194.
- Cheng, C.S.A., He Huang, H., Li, Y. & Lobo, G. (2010) Institutional monitoring through shareholder litigation. Journal of Financial Economics, 95(3), 356–383.
- Engelmann, K. & Cornell, B. (1988) Measuring the cost of corporate litigation: five case studies. The Journal of Legal Studies, 17(2), 377–399.
10.1086/468134 Google Scholar
- Fang, V.W., Tian, X. & Tice, S. (2014) Does stock liquidity enhance or impede firm innovation? The Journal of Finance, 69(5), 2085–2125. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12187
- Firth, M., Rui, O.M. & Wu, W. (2011) The effects of political connections and state ownership on corporate litigation in China. The Journal of Law and Economics, 54(3), 573–607.
- Francis, J., Philbrick, D. & Schipper, K. (1994) Shareholder litigation and corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(2), 137–164.
- Gompers, P.A. (1996) Grandstanding in the venture capital industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 42(1), 133–156.
- Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R. & Rajgopal, S. (2005) The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1–3), 3–73.
- Gu, Y., Mao, C.X. & Tian, X. (2017) Banks' interventions and firms' innovation: evidence from debt covenant violations. The Journal of Law and Economics, 60(4), 637–671.
- Hall, B.H. (2002) The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35–51.
- Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A. & Trajtenberg, M. (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools. Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A. & Trajtenberg, M. (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38.
- He, J.J. & Tian, X. (2013) The dark side of analyst coverage: the case of innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3), 856–878.
- Heckman, J.J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352
- Hirshleifer, D., Low, A. & Teoh, S.H. (2012) Are overconfident CEOs better innovators? The Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1457–1498.
- Hochberg, Y.V., Serrano, C.J. & Ziedonis, R.H. (2018) Patent collateral, investor commitment, and the market for venture lending. Journal of Financial Economics, 130(1), 74–94.
- Holmstrom, B. (1989) Agency costs and innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 12(3), 305–327.
- Hsu, P.-H., Tian, X. & Xu, Y. (2014) Financial development and innovation: cross-country evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(1), 116–135.
- Ivashina, V., Nair, V.B., Saunders, A., Massoud, N. & Stover, R. (2009) Bank debt and corporate governance. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 41–77.
- Jensen, M.C. (1986) Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
- Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H. (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure (SSRN Scholarly Paper 94043).
- Jiang, C., Wintoki, M.B. & Xi, Y. (2021) Insider trading and the legal expertise of corporate executives. Journal of Banking & Finance, 127, 106114.
- Johnson, M.F., Kasznik, R. & Nelson, K.K. (2000) Shareholder wealth effects of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995. Review of Accounting Studies, 5(3), 217–233.
10.1023/A:1009612610389 Google Scholar
- Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. & Shleifer, A. (2000) Tunneling. American Economic Review, 90(2), 22–27.
- Kroszner, R.S. & Strahan, P.E. (2001) Bankers on boards: monitoring, conflicts of interest, and lender liability. Journal of Financial Economics, 62(3), 415–452.
- La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (2000) Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 3–27.
- La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1997) Legal determinants of external finance. The Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1131–1150.
- La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1998) Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.
- Le, N., Nguyen, D.D. & Sila, V. (2021) Does shareholder litigation affect the corporate information environment? Journal of Financial Markets, 56, 100600.
10.1016/j.finmar.2020.100600 Google Scholar
- Li, J., Shan, Y., Tian, G. & Hao, X. (2020) Labor cost, government intervention, and corporate innovation: evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101668.
- Lin, C., Liu, S. & Manso, G. (2021) Shareholder litigation and corporate innovation. Management Science, 67(6), 3346–3367.
- Mann, W. (2018) Creditor rights and innovation: evidence from patent collateral. Journal of Financial Economics, 130(1), 25–47.
- Manso, G. (2011) Motivating innovation. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1823–1860.
- Nguyen, T. (2018) CEO incentives and corporate innovation. Financial Review, 53(2), 255–300. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12144
- Ni, X. & Yin, S. (2018) Shareholder litigation rights and the cost of debt: evidence from derivative lawsuits. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 169–186.
- Pham, M.H., Merkoulova, Y. & Veld, C. (2023) Credit risk assessment and executives' legal expertise. Review of Accounting Studies, 28, 2361–2400.
- Porter, M.E. (1992) Capital disadvantage: America's failing capital investment system. Harvard Business Review, 70(5), 65–82.
- Romano, R. (1991) The shareholder suit: litigation without foundation? The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7(1), 55–87.
- Romer, P.M. (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.
- Saidi, F. & Žaldokas, A. (2021) How does firms' innovation disclosure affect their banking relationships? Management Science, 67(2), 742–768.
10.1287/mnsc.2019.3498 Google Scholar
- Scharfstein, D.S. & Stein, J.C. (2000) The dark side of internal capital markets: divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment. The Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2537–2564.
- Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1989) Management entrenchment: the case of manager-specific investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 123–139.
- Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1997) A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.
- Skinner, D.J. (1994) Why firms voluntarily disclose bad news. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(1), 38–60.
- Skinner, D.J. & Sloan, R.G. (2002) Earnings surprises, growth expectations, and stock returns or don't let an earnings torpedo sink your portfolio. Review of Accounting Studies, 7(2), 289–312.
10.1023/A:1020294523516 Google Scholar
- Solow, R.M. (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320.
- Stein, J.C. (1989) Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: a model of myopic corporate behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4), 655–669.
- Stiglitz, J.E. (1985) Credit markets and the control of capital. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 17(2), 133–152.
- Tan, L. (2013) Creditor control rights, state of nature verification, and financial reporting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 1–22.
- Tian, X. & Wang, T.Y. (2014) Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation. Review of Financial Studies, 27(1), 211–255.
- Ting, H.I., Wang, M.C., Yang, J.J. & Tuan, K.W. (2021) Technical expert CEOs and corporate innovation. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 68, 101603.
- Wintoki, M.B., Linck, J.S. & Netter, J.M. (2012) Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581–606.
- Zhou, D., Peng, J. & Gao, X. (2021) Examining export trade and corporate innovation: A multiphase difference-in-differences method. China Journal of Accounting Research, 14(2), 207–230. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2021.01.002