Volume 64, Issue 5 pp. 4647-4673
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Keju tradition and major litigation cases: The persistent impact of Confucian norm standard

Xuefeng Hu

Xuefeng Hu

School of Smart Governance, Renmin University of China, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

Search for more papers by this author
Wenlan Wang

Corresponding Author

Wenlan Wang

School of Finance, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai, China

Correspondence

Wenlan Wang, School of Finance, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Rong Xu

Rong Xu

School of Finance and China Financial Policy Research Centre, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China

School of Business and Economics, Algoma University, Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Fulong Xiao

Fulong Xiao

Department of Applied Finance, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 August 2024

Abstract

Using the variation in China's civil examination system (keju) achievements across prefecture-level cities in the Ming–Qing period (c.1368–1905), we find that keju tradition has a persistent impact on the norm of business ethics today. With one standard deviation increase of keju tradition intensity, the probability of major litigation cases for local listed firms decreases by nearly 12% of the sample mean. The persistent effect of keju tradition can be attributed to two channels, the social value of fair competition and the excess cost of misconduct. Further analysis shows that our result is not driven by conservatism.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.