Response to ‘Objective neuromuscular monitoring: the challenges limiting its use’ by Dr. El-Orbany
Corresponding Author
C. M. Söderström
Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
Correspondence
C. M. Söderström, Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorK. Z. Eskildsen
Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorM. R. Gätke
Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorA. K. Staehr-Rye
Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
C. M. Söderström
Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
Correspondence
C. M. Söderström, Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorK. Z. Eskildsen
Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorM. R. Gätke
Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorA. K. Staehr-Rye
Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorConflicts of interest
None.
Funding
None.
References
- 1El Orbany M. Objective neuromuscular monitoring: the challenges limiting its use. Acta Anaesthesiol Scan 2017; DOI: 10.1111/aas.13052 [Epub ahead of print].
10.1111/aas.13052 Google Scholar
- 2Söderström CM, Eskildsen KZ, Gätke MR, Staehr-Rye AK. Objective neuromuscular monitoring of neuromuscular blockade in Denmark: an online-based survey of current practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2017; 61: 619–26.
- 3Sorgenfrei IF, Viby-Mogensen J, Swiatek FA. Does evidence lead to a change in clinical practice? Danish anaesthetists’ and nurse anesthetists’ clinical practice and knowledge of postoperative residual curarization. Ugeskr Laeger 2005; 167: 3878–82.
- 4Naguib M, Kopman AF, Lein CA, Hunter JM, Lopez A, Brull SJ. A survey of current management of neuromuscular block in the United States and Europe. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 110–9.
- 5Fortier LP, McKeen D, Turner K, de Medicis E, Warriner B, Jones PM, Chaput A, Pouliot JF, Galarneau A. The RECITE study: a Canadian prospective, multicenter study of the incidence and severity of residual neuromuscular blockade. Anesth Analg 2015; 121: 366–72.
- 6Viby-Mogensen J, Jensen NH, Engbaek J, Ording H, Skovgaard LT, Chraemmer-Jørgensen B. Tactile and visual evaluation of the response to train-off our nerve stimulation. Anesthesiology 1985; 63: 440–3.
- 7Fruergaard K, Viby-Mogensen J, Berg H, el-Mahdy AM. Tactile evaluation of the response to double burst stimulation decreases, but does not eliminate, the problem of postoperative residual paralysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42: 1168–74.
- 8Debaene B, Plaud B, Dilly MP, Donati F. Residual paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 1042–8.
- 9Engbæk J, Østergaard D, Skovgaard LT, Viby-Mogensen J. Reversal of intense neuromuscular blockade following infusion of atracurium. Anesthesiology 1990; 72: 803–6.
- 10Dobson G, Chong M, Chow L, Flexman A, Kurrek M, Laflamme C, Lagacée A, Stacey S, Thiessen B. Guidelines to the practice of anesthesia. Revised edition. Can J Anesth 2017; 64: 65–91.
- 11 Norsk anestesiologisk forening & Anestesisykepleiernes landsgruppe af NSF. Norsk standard for anestesi 2016. Available at: http://nafweb.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Norsk-Standard-for-anestesi-2016.pdf (accessed 14 November 2017).
- 12 Dansk Selskab for Anæstesiologi og Intensiv Medicin (DASAIM). Rekommandation for anæstesi 2012. Available at: http://anaesthesia.dk/backup/dasaim/images/stories/PDF/Rekommendationer/REKOMMANDATION_FOR_ANSTESI_2012_FINAL_220112.pdf (accessed 14 November 2017).
- 13Checketts MR, Alladi R, Ferguson K, Gemmell L, Handy JM, Klein AA, Love NJ, Misra U, Morris C, Nathanson MH, Rodney GE, Verma R, Pandit JJ, Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2015. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 85–93.
- 14 Australian and New Zeeland College of Anaesthetists. PS18 2017: Guidelines on monitoring during anaesthesia. Available at: http://www.anzca.edu.au/documents/ps18-2015-guidelines-on-monitoring-during-anaesthe.pdf (accessed 14 November 2017).
Citing Literature
