Volume 22, Issue S1 pp. 60-68
Invited Review

Recent advances in the management of Takayasu arteritis

Durga Prasanna Misra

Corresponding Author

Durga Prasanna Misra

Department of Clinical Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, India

Correspondence: Dr Debashish Danda, Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Anupam Wakhlu

Anupam Wakhlu

Department of Rheumatology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India

Search for more papers by this author
Vikas Agarwal

Vikas Agarwal

Department of Clinical Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, India

Search for more papers by this author
Debashish Danda

Debashish Danda

Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 January 2019
Citations: 53

Abstract

Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a challenging large vessel vasculitis to treat. Distinguishing disease activity from vascular damage is difficult, often relying on clinician judgement aided by composite clinical disease activity indices with angiographic evidence of vessel wall thickening or vessel wall hypermetabolism demonstrable on positron emission tomography computerized tomography (PET CT). Glucocorticoids form the mainstay of remission induction. While other conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) or biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) are commonly used, evidence supporting their usefulness is sparse and generally of low quality. The only two randomized controlled trials (RCT) of a DMARD in TA failed to show efficacy of abatacept in reducing relapses of TA, however, tocilizumab showed a trend towards reduction in time to relapses. Of the cDMARDs, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), leflunomide and cyclophosphamide have shown clinical efficacy in case series, with some evidence that methotrexate, azathioprine and MMF might retard angiographic progression. Among bDMARDs, anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents and tocilizumab may be useful in patients refractory to cDMARDs with retardation of angiographic progression, based on evidence derived from mostly retrospective case series, whereas the role of rituximab and ustekinumab needs further elucidation. Revascularization, either surgical or endovascular, is the treatment of choice to relieve critical, symptomatic stenoses and are best undertaken during inactive disease. Emerging evidence suggests that patients with TA also have increased cardiovascular risk and this requires appropriate management. Large studies involving multiple centers are the need of the hour to appropriately evaluate utility of currently available immunosuppressive therapy in TA.

Conflicts of interest

None.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.