Volume 65, Issue 3 pp. 729-743
Paper

Automatic Classification of Bloodstain Patterns Caused by Gunshot and Blunt Impact at Various Distances

Yu Liu Ph.D.

Corresponding Author

Yu Liu Ph.D.

Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Atanasoff Hall, 2434 Osborn Dr, Ames, 50011 IA

Corresponding author: Yu Liu, Ph.D. E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel Attinger Ph.D.

Daniel Attinger Ph.D.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, 2025 Black Engineering, Ames, 50011 IA

Search for more papers by this author
Kris De Brabanter Ph.D.

Kris De Brabanter Ph.D.

Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, 2438 Osborn Dr, Ames, 50011 IA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 January 2020
Citations: 28

[Correction added 16 January 2020. The Acknowledgments section was omitted from original publication, but has now been added.]

See Comment here
See Authors' Response here

Abstract

The forensics discipline of bloodstain pattern analysis plays an important role in crime scene analysis and reconstruction. One reconstruction question is whether the blood has been spattered via gunshot or blunt impact such as beating or stabbing. This paper proposes an automated framework to classify bloodstain spatter patterns generated under controlled conditions into either gunshot or blunt impact classes. Classification is performed using machine learning. The study is performed with 94 blood spatter patterns which are available as public data sets, designs a set of features with possible relevance to classification, and uses the random forests method to rank the most useful features and perform classification. The study shows that classification accuracy decreases with the increasing distance between the target surface collecting the stains and the blood source. Based on the data set used in this study, the model achieves 99% accuracy in classifying spatter patterns at distances of 30 cm, 93% accuracy at distances of 60 cm, and 86% accuracy at distances of 120 cm. Results with 10 additional backspatter patterns also show that the presence of muzzle gases can reduce classification accuracy.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.