Volume 63, Issue 6 pp. 1867-1869
Technical Note

Frequency of Dermatologic Findings at Autopsy

Margaret Cocks M.D., Ph.D.

Corresponding Author

Margaret Cocks M.D., Ph.D.

Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital Pathology Building, Rm 401, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287

Additional information and reprint requsts:

Margaret Cocks, M.D., Ph.D.

Department of Pathology

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Pathology Building, Rm 401

600 N. Wolfe Street

Baltimore

MD 21287

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Inbal Sander M.D.

Inbal Sander M.D.

Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 North Caroline Street, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21287

Search for more papers by this author
Barbara Crain M.D., Ph.D.

Barbara Crain M.D., Ph.D.

Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital Pathology Building, Rm 401, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 March 2018
Citations: 4
Presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the College of American Pathologists on October 4–7, 2015, in Nashville, TN.

Abstract

A complete academic autopsy includes an external examination with inspection of gross dermatologic findings. At our institution, the postmortem examination also includes a standard skin biopsy. We determined the microscopic yield of this standard postmortem skin biopsy and the overall frequency of macroscopic dermatologic diagnoses. We reviewed 389 complete autopsies conducted between 2012 and 2014. Both microscopic and macroscopic dermatologic diagnoses were analyzed. A macroscopic dermatologic diagnosis was made in 32% of cases while a microscopic diagnosis was recorded in 10% of cases. Dermatologic diagnoses were identified as leading directly to cause of death in 4% of patients and as contributing to death in another 20%. Targeted biopsies were more likely to reveal histologic abnormalities than routine biopsies from a standard anatomic site. Better training in skin gross examination in addition to systematic sampling of both skin lesions and grossly normal skin may improve diagnostic accuracy and enhance clinical pathologic correlations.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.