Volume 63, Issue 6 pp. 1846-1853
Technical Note

Influence Factors Regarding the Effectiveness of Automated Ballistic Comparison on 0.38 Special Caliber Bullets and Cartridge Cases

Lehi Sudy dos Santos M.Sc.

Corresponding Author

Lehi Sudy dos Santos M.Sc.

Federal Police – National Forensic Institute, SAIS Quadra 07 Lotes 09/10, Asa Sul Brasília, DF, CEP: 70610-200 Brazil

Materials Laboratory, Brasilia University, Darcy Ribeiro Campus, Bloco SG9, Asa Norte Brasília, CEP: 70910-900 DF, Brazil

Additional information and reprint requests:

Lehi Sudy dos Santos, M.Sc.

Federal Police– National Forensic Institute

SAIS Quadra 07 Lotes 09/10

Asa Sul Brasília

DF, CEP: 70610-200

Brazil.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Palloma Vieira Muterlle Ph.D.

Palloma Vieira Muterlle Ph.D.

Materials Laboratory, Brasilia University, Darcy Ribeiro Campus, Bloco SG9, Asa Norte Brasília, CEP: 70910-900 DF, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 March 2018
Citations: 1
The authors are solely responsible for the contents of this research paper, declaring no conflict of interest with the commercial equipment mentioned in the paper, with their identification not implying on any recommendation or endorsement.
Presented in part at the 1st Meeting of the Brazilian Society of Forensic Science, September 1-4, 2014, in Ribeirão Preto – SP; the 23rd ABCM International Congress of Mechanical Engineering, December 6-11, 2015, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; and the 21st Triennial Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Science, August 21-25, 2017, in Toronto, Canada.

Abstract

Factors influencing effectiveness of automated comparisons, test-fired bullets, and cartridge cases from 0.38 Special revolvers were logged into the Evofinder® Ballistic ID System. Tests were performed as follows: First test correlated test-fires of the same type, second test compared different types of ammunition components, third test replicated the second test in a larger database, and fourth test replicated the third test with students having no previous firearm identification experience. System effectiveness with projectiles in the first test was 0.89. With cartridge cases, effectiveness was 0.79 with combined results, but analysis of separate results by breech face and firing pin revealed low effectiveness by breech face (0.40). In the second, third, and fourth tests, effectiveness with projectiles were 0.61, 0.51, and 0.44. In addition, these tests had effectiveness with cartridge cases equivalent to 0.55, 0.43, and 0.44. Results are useful to establish routine protocols, system improvements, or comparative assessment of other electronic systems.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.