Volume 63, Issue 6 pp. 1836-1840
Technical Note

A Comparison Among Three Multiplex Y-STR Profiling Kits for Sexual Assault Cases

Benedita Ferreira-Silva M.Sc.

Corresponding Author

Benedita Ferreira-Silva M.Sc.

Department of Public Health, Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Porto, Portugal

Additional information and reprint requests:

Benedita Ferreira da Silva, M.Sc.

Department of Public Health

Forensic Sciences and Medical Education

Faculty of Medicine

University of Porto

4200 - 319 Porto

Portugal

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Margarida Fonseca-Cardoso Ph.D.

Margarida Fonseca-Cardoso Ph.D.

Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

CIIMAR, Matosinhos, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Maria João Porto M.Sc.

Maria João Porto M.Sc.

National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Porto, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Teresa Magalhães M.D., Ph.D.

Teresa Magalhães M.D., Ph.D.

Department of Public Health, Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

Institute of Research and Advanced Training in Health Sciences and Technologies (IINFACTS), Department of Sciences, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS-CESPU), Gandra, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Laura Cainé M.D., Ph.D.

Laura Cainé M.D., Ph.D.

Department of Public Health, Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Porto, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 February 2018
Citations: 17

Abstract

Biological evidence of sexual assault is one of the most difficult sample types to analyze in forensic laboratories. Y-STR markers are thus a valuable tool for analyzing these samples. The aim of this project was to compare three Y-STR commercial kits by analyzing their amplification performance on casework samples. Overall, 247 trace samples were analyzed with a Yfiler® Plus PCR Amplification Kit (Applied Biosystems), PowerPlex® Y23 (Promega®) System and AmpFLSTR® Yfiler™ PCR Amplification Kit (Applied Biosystems). Comparing the amplification performance of the three kits, the first two were significantly more sensitive than the latter (p < 0.001). For samples, with a male DNA quantity less than 0.5 ng, the PowerPlex Y23® kit was the most sensitive and best performing kit, followed by the Yfiler® Plus kit (p = 0.009). In conclusion, the Yfiler® Plus and PowerPlex Y-23® kits are viable alternatives to older kits for samples with low amounts of male DNA.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.