Volume 59, Issue 5 pp. 1242-1247
Paper

Influence of Velocity on Variability in Gait Kinematics: Implications for Recognition in Forensic Science

Sylvia X. M. Yang M.Tech.

Corresponding Author

Sylvia X. M. Yang M.Tech.

Unit of Forensic Anthropology, Department of Forensic Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V's Vej 11, PO Box 2713, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Additional information and reprint requests:

Sylvia X. M. Yang, M.Tech.

Department of Forensic Medicine

University of Copenhagen

Frederik V's Vej 11

PO Box 2713

DK-2100 Copenhagen

Denmark

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Peter K. Larsen Ph.D.

Peter K. Larsen Ph.D.

Unit of Forensic Anthropology, Department of Forensic Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V's Vej 11, PO Box 2713, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Tine Alkjær Ph.D.

Tine Alkjær Ph.D.

Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Niels Lynnerup Ph.D.

Niels Lynnerup Ph.D.

Unit of Forensic Anthropology, Department of Forensic Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V's Vej 11, PO Box 2713, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Erik B. Simonsen Ph.D.

Erik B. Simonsen Ph.D.

Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 March 2014
Citations: 7

Abstract

Closed circuit television (CCTV) footage is often available from crime scenes and may be used to compare perpetrators with suspects. Usually, the footage comprises incomplete gait cycles at different velocities, making gait pattern identification from crimes difficult. This study investigated the concurrence of joint angles throughout a gait cycle at three different velocities (3.0, 4.5, 6.0 km/h). Six datasets at each velocity were collected from 16 men. A variability range VR throughout the gait cycle at each velocity for each joint angle for each person was calculated. The joint angles at each velocity were compared pairwise, and whenever this showed values within the VR of this velocity, the case was positive. By adding the positives throughout the gait cycle, phases with high and low concurrences were located; peak concurrence was observed at mid-stance phase. Striving for the same velocity for the suspect and perpetrator is recommended.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.