Volume 59, Issue 5 pp. 1343-1350
Technical Note

Collecting and Analyzing DNA Evidence from Fingernails: A Comparative Study,,§

Lisa M. Hebda M.S.

Lisa M. Hebda M.S.

Forensic Science Program, School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, 655 Auditorium Road, Room 560A, East Lansing, MI, 48824

Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory, 115 Purple Heart Dr., Dover AFB, DE 19902.Search for more papers by this author
Ashley E. Doran B.A.

Ashley E. Doran B.A.

Forensic Science Program, School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, 655 Auditorium Road, Room 560A, East Lansing, MI, 48824

Search for more papers by this author
David R. Foran Ph.D.

Corresponding Author

David R. Foran Ph.D.

Forensic Science Program, School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, 655 Auditorium Road, Room 560A, East Lansing, MI, 48824

Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, Natural Science Building, East Lansing, MI, 48824

Additional information and reprint requests:

David Foran, Ph.D.

School of Criminal Justice and Department of Zoology

560 Baker Hall

655 Auditorium Road

Michigan State University

E. Lansing, MI 48824

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 March 2014
Citations: 21
Presented in part at the 64th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, February 20-25, 2012 in Atlanta, GA; and at the 65th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, February 18-23, 2013 in Washington DC.
§
Supported by Grant Number 2010-DN-BX-K224, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
Points of view in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official positions or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Abstract

Forensic practitioners and crime laboratories regularly collect and analyze fingernail evidence; however, the best techniques for processing such evidence have not been established. In this study, numerous aspects of fingernail evidence processing—collection of exogenous cells, transportation, purification of DNA, and STR analysis—were analyzed using fingernails harboring applied blood or epithelial cells from scratchings. Autosomal STR mixtures resulted when fingernails were soaked or swabbed, while scrapings rarely generated mixtures but exhibited allelic dropout. Y-STRs yielded single source profiles, with scrapings again showing dropout. A silica-based kit extraction recovered significantly more exogenous DNA than did organic extraction, neither of which was affected by nail polish. Swabbing nails in succession resulted in some cross-contamination from exogenous material, while transporting nails together did not, although there was loss of exogenous cells. Optimized nail processing produced complete Y-STR profiles of male volunteers from female fingernails following scratchings.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.