Volume 13, Issue 1 pp. 3-13
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies

Michael Barkham

Corresponding Author

Michael Barkham

Centre for Psychological Services Research, University of Sheffield

Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Bridgette Bewick

Bridgette Bewick

University of Leeds

Search for more papers by this author
Tracy Mullin

Tracy Mullin

University of Leeds

Search for more papers by this author
Simon Gilbody

Simon Gilbody

University of York

Search for more papers by this author
Janice Connell

Janice Connell

Centre for Psychological Services Research, University of Sheffield

Search for more papers by this author
Jane Cahill

Jane Cahill

University of Leeds

Search for more papers by this author
John Mellor-Clark

John Mellor-Clark

CORE IMS, Rugby

Search for more papers by this author
David Richards

David Richards

University of Exeter

Search for more papers by this author
Gisela Unsworth

Gisela Unsworth

Kingston Hospital

Search for more papers by this author
Chris Evans

Chris Evans

Nottingham NHS Trust & University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 February 2013
Citations: 285

Abstract

Background: There is a need for a generic, short, and easy-to-use assessment measure for common presentations of psychological distress in UK primary care mental health settings. This paper sets out the development of the CORE-10 in response to this need. Method: Items were drawn from the CORE-OM and 10 items were selected according to a combination of usefulness, coverage of item clusters, and statistical procedures. Three CORE-OM datasets were employed in the development phase: (1) a primary care sample, (2) a sample from an MRC platform trial of enhanced collaborative care of depression in primary care, and (3) a general population sample derived from the Office of National Statistics Psychiatric Morbidity Follow-up survey. A fourth dataset comprising a sample from an occupational health setting was used to evaluate the CORE-10 in its standalone format. Results: The internal reliability (alpha) of the CORE-10 was .90 and the score for the CORE-10 correlated with the CORE-OM at .94 in a clinical sample and .92 in a non-clinical sample. The clinical cut-off score for general psychological distress was 11.0 with a reliable change index (90% CI) of 6. For depression, the cut-off score for the CORE-10 was 13 and yielded sensitivity and specificity values of .92 (CI=.83–1.0) and 0.72 (CI=.60–.83) respectively. Conclusion: The CORE-10 is an acceptable and feasible instrument that has good psychometric properties and is practical to use with people presenting with common mental health problems in primary care settings.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.