Volume 35, Issue 3 pp. 337-354

Phonological awareness therapy and articulatory training approaches for children with phonological disorders: a comparative outcome study

Anne Hesketh

Corresponding Author

Anne Hesketh

Centre for Human Communication and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Centre for Human Communication and Deafness, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Catherine Adams

Catherine Adams

Centre for Human Communication and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Catherine Nightingale

Catherine Nightingale

Centre for Human Communication and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Rebecca Hall

Rebecca Hall

Centre for Human Communication and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 December 2010
Citations: 79

Abstract

Sixty-one children, aged 3;6-5;0, with developmental phonological disorders (PD) participated in a study comparing the effects of metaphonologically (MET) or articulation-based (ART) therapy. Maturational effects were controlled for by the inclusion of 59 normally speaking control children of the same age range. Measures of phonological (speech) output and phonological awareness were taken before and after therapy for all subjects and at 3 months post-therapy for PD children. Results showed that PD children improved significantly in both phonological output and awareness skills across the intervention period compared with control children, but that there was no significant difference on the awareness measure between ART and MET groups. ART and MET groups differed from each other on one measure of speech improvement only, with the ART group making more change than the MET group on individual probe scores. Follow-up measures for both therapy groups indicated that there was little difference between the groups on phonological awareness change or speech development 3 months after intervention, though there was a trend for MET children to continue to make more long-term change than the ART group on one output measure. Additional analysis showed that there were generally few significant implications for outcome between PD children with good initial phonological awareness skills and those who initially had poor phonological awareness skills.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.