Volume 95, Issue 11 pp. 1341-1344

The fear of necrotizing enterocolitis versus achieving optimal growth in preterm infants—an opinion

Orna Flidel-Rimon

Orna Flidel-Rimon

Department of Neonatology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Department of Neonatology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
David Branski

David Branski

Department of Pediatrics, Hadassah Hospital. Jerusalem, Israel, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Department of Neonatology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
Eric S. Shinwell

Corresponding Author

Eric S. Shinwell

Department of Neonatology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Department of Neonatology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Eric S. Shinwell, Department of Neonatology, Kaplan Medical Center, PO Box 1, Rehovot 76100, Israel. Tel: +972-89441218. Fax: +972-89441768. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 March 2007
Citations: 36

Abstract

Very-low-birthweight (VLBW) infants suffer marked growth delay despite well-intentioned efforts at combining enteral and parenteral nutrition. Fear of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) has traditionally influenced neonatologists toward delaying and progressing slowly with enteral feeding, while supporting the infant with parenteral nutrition. Current evidence suggests significant benefits of enteral feeding that is started early and advanced at rates of 20–35 ml/kg/d.

Conclusion: We conclude that fear of inadequate growth should replace the fear of NEC in guiding nutritional strategies for these infants.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.