Volume 8, Issue 4 pp. 177-183

Effect of KMD-3213, an α1A-adrenoceptor antagonist, on the prostatic urethral pressure and blood pressure in male decerebrate dogs

Katsuyoshi Akiyama

Katsuyoshi Akiyama

Central Research Laboratories, KISSEI Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Minamiazumi, Nagano,

Search for more papers by this author
Hiromitsu Noto

Hiromitsu Noto

Akita Hinyokika Clinic, Hiroomote, Akita,

Search for more papers by this author
Osamu Nishizawa

Osamu Nishizawa

Departments of Urology, School of Medicine, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Nagano,

Search for more papers by this author
Kimio Sugaya

Kimio Sugaya

Departments of Urology, School of MedicineRyukyu University, Nakagami, Okinawa,

Search for more papers by this author
Ryoichi Yamagishi

Ryoichi Yamagishi

Central Research Laboratories, KISSEI Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Minamiazumi, Nagano,

Search for more papers by this author
Makio Kitazawa

Makio Kitazawa

Central Research Laboratories, KISSEI Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Minamiazumi, Nagano,

Search for more papers by this author
Seigi Tsuchida

Seigi Tsuchida

Akita Rosai Hospital, Ohdate, Akita, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 December 2001
Citations: 31
Correspondence: KatsuyoshiAkiyama Central Research Laboratories, KISSEI Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, 4365-1 Kashiwabara, Hotaka, Minamiazumi, Nagano 399-8304, Japan. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Background: KMD-3213 is an α1A-adrenoceptor-selective antagonist currently being developed for the treatment of urinary outlet obstruction in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. In the present study, the uroselectivity of KMD-3213 was evaluated and compared with that of prazosin and tamsulosin in a decerebrate dog model.

Methods: Intercollicular decerebration was carried out in male mongrel dogs under anesthesia. The inhibitory effects of intravenously and intraduodenally administered compounds on the increase in intraurethral pressure (IUP) induced by electrical stimulation of the hypogastric nerve were estimated. Systemic blood pressure was measured simultaneously.

Results: The α1-antagonists tested produced a dose-dependent inhibition of the induced IUP response and decreased mean blood pressure (MBP). The ID50 of KMD-3213, tamsulosin and prazosin for IUP (dose required to inhibit the increase in IUP by 50%) was 3.15, 1.73 and 11.8 μg/kg i.v., respectively, and the ED20 for the hypotensive effect (dose required to reduce MBP by 20%) was 8.03, 0.59 and 2.46 μg/kg i.v., respectively. The data indicate that uroselectivity (ED20/ID50) of KMD-3213 is 12- and 7.5-fold higher than that of prazosin and tamsulosin, respectively. When the drugs were administered intraduodenally, KMD-3213 was sufficiently absorbed from the digestive tract and continued to demonstrate at least 3.8-fold higher uroselectivity than tamsulosin.

Conclusion: Based on these findings, KMD-3213 appears to be an effective orally active compound for decreasing urethral resistance during micturition that does not induce any negative cardiovascular effects in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.